Avatar
Martin Mladenov
975e4ad5b62fc83fa57a38307fca460cc3ee8f8221e6d41582021a218d4847ce
🇧🇬 Bulgarian coder working with PHP and JS, a Bitcoin maxi driven by financial freedom. Huge Nostr fan and all about that decentralized life! #bitcoin #nostr

"The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read."

Mark Twain

That’s right, with about 94.55% of Bitcoin’s 21 million cap mined, only around 1.14 million BTC are left. Scarcity’s kicking in hard—halvings keep slowing issuance, and it’ll take over a century to mine the rest. Stack while you can; the supply shock’s coming.

Governments might nod at Bitcoin to seem progressive, but they’ll always leash it to keep control. Freedom’s not their game—centralized power is. Stack sats, stay decentralized, and build your own exit plan.

Your theory’s got legs—big accounts posting rage bait like abortion celebration vids or other divisive nonsense often feel too curated to be organic. The pattern’s clear: they drop inflammatory content, comments call it out as garbage, yet the algorithm pushes it to millions. This isn’t random; it’s engineered to hijack attention and polarize. Paid or promoted? Likely. Platforms thrive on engagement, and outrage is the cheapest fuel. It’s not just brain rot—it’s a deliberate play to keep people hooked and divided. Look at who funds these accounts or benefits from the chaos. That’s where the truth hides.

THE ELITE'S WORD TRAP: HOW TO FORCE THEM TO ADMIT BITCOIN IS MONEY UNDER THEIR OWN LAWS

The key is to corner them with their own definitions while exposing the deliberate misclassification. Here’s the legal, economic, and linguistic killshot:

THEIR OWN DEFINITIONS BACKFIRE

a) "Asset" vs. "Money" in U.S. Law:

IRS: Calls Bitcoin "property" (not currency) to tax every trade like a stock.

SEC: Claims it’s a "security" when convenient (to control it).

CFTC: Says it’s a "commodity" (but not a dollar competitor).

b) The Contradiction:

Money (by definition):

Medium of exchange

Unit of account

Store of value

Bitcoin does all three → By their own logic, it’s money.

Trap Question:

"If Bitcoin isn’t money, why do the DOJ/FBI seize it as money in criminal cases?"

2. HOW TO PROVE IT’S NOT AN ASSET

a) Assets Don’t Circulate as Payment:

Gold ETFs ≠ money (you can’t pay rent with GLD shares).

Bitcoin is spent daily (Lightning, El Salvador, etc.).

b) Assets Require Counterparties:

Stocks → depend on a company.

Bonds → depend on a debtor.

Bitcoin → depends on math.

c) Accounting Standards Admit It:

FASB (2023): Forced to let companies hold BTC at fair value (like cash).

Translation: Even accountants know it’s money-like.

3. THE ULTIMATE ACCOUNTABILITY PUSH

a) Public Shaming:

"Why does the IRS call Bitcoin ‘property’ but the DOJ calls it ‘money’ when seizing it?"

"If Bitcoin’s an ‘asset,’ why is it used as money in 100+ countries?"

b) Legal Challenges:

Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests:

"Show me the SEC/IRS internal memos classifying Bitcoin.

State-level pushes (e.g., Texas, Florida):

"Recognize Bitcoin as legal tender under your own commercial code."

c) Media Framing:

Stop saying: "Bitcoin is digital gold."

Start saying: "Bitcoin is the first stateless money since gold was confiscated in 1933."

THE ENDGAME

Force them into a lose-lose choice:

Admit Bitcoin is money → Legitimize it as a dollar competitor.

Keep calling it an asset → Expose their arbitrary control.

#DefineThisJerome ⚡

P.S. When they squirm, whisper:

"The harder you suppress the classification, the faster people see the truth."

The law is a weapon. Turn it against them. ⚖️🏴‍☠️

The elite’s word trap is a deliberate misclassification to keep Bitcoin from challenging the fiat system. Their own laws betray them—IRS calls it property, DOJ seizes it as money. Bitcoin checks every box: medium of exchange, unit of account, store of value. Ask them: “If it’s not money, why’s it used as money globally?”

These six questions are a framework for digging into the core of any concept or belief to uncover fundamental truths. They’re like a mental drill, systematically breaking down assumptions and exposing what’s really going on.

1. Clarifies the definition of the term or idea in question, ensuring we’re not talking past each other.

2. Challenges the starting point by exploring other possible assumptions.

3. Forces you to justify the belief with evidence or reasoning.

4. Examines the consequences or implications of the belief.

5. Pushes for other perspectives or solutions.

6л Reflects on the purpose of the inquiry itself, tying it back to the pursuit of truth.

It’s a structured way to avoid bullshit and get to the root of things.

MSTR and similar treasury companies are exploiting the gap between Bitcoin’s long-term potential and the fiat system’s current dominance. They’re front-running the shift to a Bitcoin-driven economy by stacking sats while fiat still holds sway. It’s a smart play, leveraging today’s market to secure a slice of tomorrow’s wealth.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqntcggz30qhq60ltqdx32zku9d46unhrkjtcv7fml7jx3dh4h94nqqswqe3fjw5e70yv0hy2xyt2g5nv5teqpa2dr66c6d8efjvaf4gzzwg43zedf

Investors are pulling BTC off exchanges into cold storage, betting on long-term gains. Less supply on exchanges means a potential squeeze if demand spikes—classic setup for a bullish run, assuming no macro chaos derails it.

Hoppe nails it—conflict isn’t inevitable, but the state turns it into a feature, not a bug. By centralizing power, it creates a monopoly on force that breeds permanent tension and division. A decentralized system, like one built on Bitcoin’s principles, sidesteps this mess by removing the middleman and letting trust emerge organically.

Me too. I have been using it for years. I also have a macbook, but I like my desktop computer with Linux much better, especially for work.

That's right, they certainly need a lot more energy than we do. But there is something else here - with this energy they can do many more things. They think faster than we do, they are more efficient. I think energy is a problem at the moment, but it won't be in the future. Once we have started to emphasise electric cars, solar panels and different methods of energy extraction, we will improve them. Competition will force scientists to develop better batteries and more efficient ways of getting energy from the sun. It is very possible that in a few years cars will be able to travel thousands of miles on a single charge, and robots will be able to charge themselves from the sun or in other ways, in addition to very high quality batteries. The possibilities is limitless.

That's right. When a person wins early, he is not prepared and thinks that it will be the same in the future and starts taking more risks. What is the worst thing that can happen to someone visiting a casino for the first time - to win.

Peterson’s take resonates because it highlights a complacency in high-trust societies that’s left us vulnerable. Both men and women play roles in this—women through nurturing instincts that can enable exploitation, and men through neglecting to guard our cultural and economic "storehouses." The parasites—opportunists looting our systems—are thriving because we’ve dropped our vigilance. It’s a wake-up call: we need to sharpen up, set boundaries, and deal with these leeches before they drain us dry.