Oops, I meant to screenshot a part about extinction. But you can see that in the paper too

Nice. That is consistent though with them acting in good faith though right? And I agree. It’s potentially Orwellian.

Here’s the paper I was referring to. I think you’re not saying that none of the respondents who are worried are acting in bad faith?

https://aiimpacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Thousands_of_AI_authors_on_the_future_of_AI.pdf

Well shoot. Call me e/acc then :)

But for real. The above assumes we maintain control. Were I to assume that, I’d totally agree with you. I think the main difference in our views is that I would put my confidence in that assumption at less than 100%, and also small enough that I’m not comfortable simply behaving as if it is 100%.

And the sci-fi outcome is not exclusively thought to be possible by people who don’t understand LLMs. Don’t know if you’ve seen survey results from AI researchers, but you see the full range of predictions from them as well 🫂

I just see no way that doesn’t end in humans losing the ability to be part of more than essentially 0% of the economy. That might also mean extinction, idk. So it makes me think e/acc is not the way. It’s a a point of dissonance in my mind for sure because it implies freedom restriction.

I keep seeing this question, I’d actually love an answer haha. Didn’t find one quickly

Awesome. It’s now on my list. 🫂

#bookstr

nostr:note1upt203kqkn4ngl7w8343e4vmfwj3n9jyj37aadsyhxdlsp8gvwus9x87fh

#flatearth folks, please to listen to 0:52-1:23

Very few of the people that you will ever run across will understand how deep this impulse is in scientists. Not all of them. But enough that the FE hypothesis is more unlikely than likely. 🫂

https://youtu.be/KlhW12dGfFk

She is brilliant. Love it. Absolutely loved how she recognizes the limits of knowledge for example.

And I totally agree. Even as long as we are mostly earth-based, we can still support immense numbers with much increased technology and some humility in consumption, as opposed to what we have now. Just imagine the carrying capacity of earth and the effect on poverty if people could be as economically productive as FAANG management and live on a budget only a few times higher than poverty. I mean AI makes that thought moot but still.

nostr:note1qhtnmfy9s40zw3m7c9rlfdr4j7vdj4e57mrxqz0va3h5cr8ppy4qamz64e

Expanding time horizons past the next 100 years the vast majority of all humans will never step on Earth. 🫂

Awesome office

Watch the Javier Milei WEF address if you haven’t seen it. Especially the end. Baller.

🫂🫂🫂

Dear Jamie Dimon,

The use case is not breaking just laws.

The use case is making it possible to break unjust laws.

These are not the same.

🫂

(In the USA)

Does this mean damus will see regulatory risk like WoS?

🫂🫂🫂

Makes me want to ask him what he thinks history would look like if for example Rosa Parks would have been physically incapable of sitting in one of the front seats.

😂😂🤣🤣

I had the same reaction. I wanna know how their blockchain works cuz it’s way different than what I’m familiar with.

Real talk I think they are using blockchain inspired consensus but idk why

I can’t wait to see how this ages

🍿🍿🍿

😂

What wallet software even lets people do this haha.