people ask me why i don't have a wallet set up for zaps.
the answer is because unlike you i am not in it for money.
i think using Bitcoin to evade taxes is dishonorable because you're not actually making a difference - you're just kicking the can down the road by shifting the burden of financing genocide to others ...
if you are really opposed to funding Genocide then pick a politician that supports Israel and murder them. murder their entire family with them. don't kill the dog unless necessary. the dog won't grow up to become a Pro-Israel politician.
but as long as your "do-gooding" just so happens to line your pockets then i'm sorry but i'm going to call you a lying Jew. you don't care about the cause - you just like money.
no there is nothing wrong with making a profit, but if the only things you do in life are those that profit you then please spare me the babbling about do-gooding.
Tate Brothers who run this kind of Cam Whore business refer to the men who pay for it as "retards"
but which way to live isn't retarded ?
i think having 30 supercars is retarded.
you are so clever my little muffin.
the average retard following you will never figure out that, while true, none of what you wrote actually has anything to do with Bitcoin.
because Bitcoin is literally an absolutely arbitrary system among an infinite amount of other such possible systems.
Bitcoin is like the G-d of the bible. Anybody can write their own holy book and claim the G-d they invented is the one true G-d. And that you should give them your money or their G-d will curse you.
we are Autists - they are Normies
to a Normie everything is about what others think about them
of course nobody actually thinks anything good about them so they have to pay E-Thots to pretend that they do ...
this is also how Marriage works too. you work 2 jobs to have "family" which is just people who are forced to pretend that you matter so you keep paying their bills ...
to protect creators you give them tools to isolate themselves in echo chamber bubbles. this grows your platform in size and revenue, with no real discussion happening. this is how YouTube works with their removal of thumb down counter and ability of creators to remove anybody from their channel's comments.
the goal of YouTube is waste as much user time as possible on mindless videos that way as many ads can be interspersed in this non-content as possible.
on other hand to maximize discussion of ideas you remove barriers and 99% of the people flee out of fear, but those people never had any ideas to contribute in the first place. ideas of the remaining 1% fight each other to the death.
i never heard anybody say that having less muscle will make you live longer. it may be true but i never heard about it. i hope whoever studied this relationship has controlled for fat mass. that is a smaller person obviously will live longer than a bigger person but probably not because they have less muscle but because they eat less.
eating less does make you live longer. not only because you avoid diabetes but because your metabolism slows DRAMATICALLY when you eat less. my heart rate goes down by a THIRD when i diet. although we don't die from the heart mechanically wearing out it would be logical to assume that when metabolism slows damage accumulates slower.
so basically if you want to live as long as possible - eat less and keep your waist down to a small size.
the strongest causal relationship that i know of to longevity is visceral fat mass. the more fat you have inside your abdomen the shorter your life will be. this fat can be accurately measured using MRI and some clinics offer that service, but in most cases simply using a tape to measure your waist is good enough.
muscle mass ( and more importantly STRENGTH ) is positively correlated to longevity as far as i know, but i do NOT believe this relationship is causal. i believe that strength is a RESULT of health not the cause of it.
muscle mass can be beneficial because it is a calorie sink, but it isn't such a huge sink that it can't be easily overwhelmed with junk food.
many theories about what happened. most recently people try to attribute obesity epidemic to seed oils which are both an abundant calorie source, very new in human diet, and have some cannabinoid type activity that may make them addictive.
another factor could simply be social acceptance. a fat woman reported on Twitter that when she was in China she was called fat to her face. frankly 100 years ago a fat person anywhere would be called fat to their face. but now we are accepting of obesity the way we accept homosexuality etc.
i was beaten for being a fat kid in school in USSR. nobody was going to stop it. i had to learn about diet and exercise and lose weight - there was no other option. i was also facing mandatory military service as well, which was another reason to get in shape.
America has a disgusting food culture. I have never eaten in a car and never will. In Germany cars are sold without cupholders because only American swine eat in cars. I recently saw a boomer couple get into their car while both eating ice cream - i would have killed those pigs if i could.
i honestly don't think the obese people today are that way because they listened to the advice of dietitians and are having a protein bar every 2 hours. i don't think any obese person has ever eaten a protein bar in their life.
there could be many explanations for this strange effect and this is the type of stuff Dr. Jacob Wilson likes to study, namely the various anomalies in the body's response to both food and training ... but i'm not sure we as dilettantes should focus on odd effects like this or at least we shouldn't try to extrapolate them to general rules from a single anomaly ...
we know a body has a set point for fat mass for example - that is if you have unlimited food you will reach a certain weight and stop getting fatter.
there also appears to be a similar set point for muscle mass as well, regulated by myostatin. there was at one point an attempt to use myostatin inhibitors as super drugs for muscle building - not sure what is the status of that now.
what may have happened in this experiment is during fasting the participants dipped below their set points for both fat and muscle but were able to rebound muscle mass faster than than fat mass. if that is the explanation then there was nothing about this unique to fasting itself.
BUT it could also be some unique effect of fasting. it could be that fasting primes the body for muscle building later when protein is reintroduced into diet. i don't know.
the 6 hour figure is a reference to the fact that there is a "refractory period" associated with muscle protein synthesis ( MPS )
that is to say a high protein meal ( Leucine Amino Acid in particular ) will stimulate MPS for say 1.5-3 hours and then it cannot be stimulated again by a meal until about 6 hours pass. this is similar to how when you have an orgasm you can't have an orgasm again until some period of time passes.
the practical implication of this is that if you had a good meal and then had nothing to eat for the next 6 hours you haven't lost an OPPORTUNITY to build muscle because there was none. but if you continue to not consume protein after 6 hours you're now throwing away that opportunity to build more muscle.
this refractory period in evolutionary terms is probably related to the time it takes to digest something like a steak, but is not actually directly driven by digestion. the refractory period for MPS is AN INTERNAL CLOCK
think of it as Jet Lag. you fly to another time zone and the body ignores the sun rising / setting time and just uses an internal clock instead. same with refractory nature of MPS - the body ignores actual availability of amino acids from digestion of food and instead uses a clock to make assumptions about their availability so it builds muscle for 1.5-3 hours after a meal then stops and refuses to build again until 6 hours Post Prandium ( after a meal ).
it's actually hard to communicate what happens because our language is too primitive to explain how the body works. in the body most opposite processes run in parallel at all times. so you're both building and breaking down muscle 100% of the time and the same for fat etc. this isn't how people run their lives - nobody is running heating and AC at the same time for example, and for that reason our language is poorly equipped to deal with how the body works.
so when i say the body is building or breaking down muscle it can mean different things because the body is always doing both of those things and yet it doesn't always make sense to think in those terms and so on ... this is why people of average intelligence need rules of thumb and diets and so on because they can't understand how it actually works ...
if you would rather learn from somebody other than me i recommend Dr. Jacob Wilson ( The Muscle PHD ), Mike Dolce ( The Dolce Diet ), Mark Sisson, Erwan Le Corre, Stephan Guyenet ...
i don't think there is anybody better than me overall but i also don't know everything and it's probably beneficial to supplement my knowledge with that of others ...
correlation doesn't imply causation. have you seen what people used to eat back when they were thin ? we were all thin in Soviet Union and it had nothing to do with timing - it had everything to do with out food being inedible. all our food tasted like cardboard.
what happened since, is food processing scientists figured out a way to turn food into a drug by mixing carbs, fats, sugar, salt, caffeine and cannabis and morphine like substances from seed oils and dairy and packaging it all into essentially pills that require no real chewing or digestion and instead just send the payload straight into your blood stream ...
by the way people were not healthy 100 years ago. they were simply thin and were not dying from diabetes. but they were not healthy. any modern athlete that properly applies current science would easily be able to break in half anybody from 100 years ago.
so the bad news is you still have a lot to learn. the good news is that because i am on NOSTR you may not need to go to Twitter to learn it.
having high IQ is not substitute for knowledge.
if you go for more than 6 hours without protein in the diet you will begin to lose muscle relative to what amount of muscle you would have had if you had protein.
working out while not eating protein will only make you lose muscle faster because you will accelerate muscle breakdown without increasing protein synthesis ( granted, this will depend on how long the fast is - if the stimulus of workout lasts longer than the fast then you will still build muscle, but i would NEVER work out unless i was going to eat protein in the following couple of hours ).
fasting when your weight randomly goes up is not as clever an idea as it sounds, because it isn't random fluctuations ( that are mostly due to either water weight or contents of your intestines ) that will kill you but the integral of visceral fat mass overtime. so for example if you carried an average of 20 lbs of visceral fat for 20 years that 400 lbs of visceral fat pound-years is what is going to kill you.
the real reason to fast is because it is psychologically easier to periodically fast than to always stop eating before you're full ( which is what a dietitian would tell you to do ).
always stopping before you're full would be like having sex every day but always stopping before reaching orgasm. this is torture and the reason why very few people succeed on such diets. it is obviously more pleasurable to go for a few days without any sex and then be completely satisfied. likewise it is more pleasurable to touch no food the whole day and then only eat in the last few hours of the day ( how most people fast, and also how our hunter ancestors used to eat ).
this is the real reason for fasting - everything else is pseudoscientific BS charlatans make up to rationalize it with things like "autophagy" and so on.
we humans ( and other carnivores ) evolved to starve most of the time and occasionally pig out. nibbling until half full is contrary to our nature, which is why everybody hates that and few can stick to it.
if any of you want to know more about nutrition ask me on my site here
https://dissidentsound.discoursehosting.net/c/health/nutrition/113
i need to correct myself. if you work out without eating protein you will still gain mass in the muscle that you trained, but the protein will be pulled from your other muscles and / or your organs. i assume this is not what anybody wants.
the protein doesn't "float around" your body - rather your entire body is made of protein, which constantly "turns over" ( is both broken down and synthesized back ). so you won't suddenly run out of protein and die if you don't eat protein but the total amount of protein in your body will start going down after about 6 hours of not eating protein and will go down faster the more you train.
bodybuilders refer to something called "lean body mass" which is your total body mass minus your fat mass. the goal is to maximize lean body mass. skipping protein for more than 6 hours will always result in lean body mass going down, even if the ONE muscle you trained might be getting bigger.
for 90% of people the weight loss benefits will outweigh the muscle loss downsides - we're on the same page regarding that, the question is - what is the proper timing ?
IMO your proposed timing is a knee jerk reaction of panicking when you see weight go up on a scale and isn't based in science. that said it might work for you BECAUSE it makes sense to you ( even though it's wrong ) and you're able to do it because you believe in it.
in the end diet effectiveness is 90% adherence and 10% what diet it actually is and whether it is scientific or not.
but if you want the most OPTIMUM way to do it, MY suggestion would be to fast whenever you know you will be unable to work out or obtain clean food ( for example when traveling ) and vice versa - try to overlap high protein consumption with heavy training, with protein consumption starting anywhere from about 2 hours before training to 1 hour after training, and continuing for 2 or 3 days after training.
work out is essentially stimulus for protein synthesis ( when amino acids from food breakdown are synthesized back into muscle fibers ) - nothing more. protein is fuel injection and workout is the spark plug. if you want your engine to run at maximum efficiency you time injection and ignition relative to each other, and you also time protein consumption and training relative to each other.
the bro science of 1 hour "anabolic window" is simply a low IQ way of understanding what i am trying to explain here, and a very crude approximation / rule of thumb.
there is a guy ( Dr. Jacob Wilson ) who calls himself "The Muscle PHD" who knows more about this than me ( and runs an entire institute which he founded just to study this ) ... he creates a lot of free content, but unless you're a pro athlete you probably don't need that level of knowledge ...
having high IQ is not substitute for knowledge.
if you go for more than 6 hours without protein in the diet you will begin to lose muscle relative to what amount of muscle you would have had if you had protein.
working out while not eating protein will only make you lose muscle faster because you will accelerate muscle breakdown without increasing protein synthesis ( granted, this will depend on how long the fast is - if the stimulus of workout lasts longer than the fast then you will still build muscle, but i would NEVER work out unless i was going to eat protein in the following couple of hours ).
fasting when your weight randomly goes up is not as clever an idea as it sounds, because it isn't random fluctuations ( that are mostly due to either water weight or contents of your intestines ) that will kill you but the integral of visceral fat mass overtime. so for example if you carried an average of 20 lbs of visceral fat for 20 years that 400 lbs of visceral fat pound-years is what is going to kill you.
the real reason to fast is because it is psychologically easier to periodically fast than to always stop eating before you're full ( which is what a dietitian would tell you to do ).
always stopping before you're full would be like having sex every day but always stopping before reaching orgasm. this is torture and the reason why very few people succeed on such diets. it is obviously more pleasurable to go for a few days without any sex and then be completely satisfied. likewise it is more pleasurable to touch no food the whole day and then only eat in the last few hours of the day ( how most people fast, and also how our hunter ancestors used to eat ).
this is the real reason for fasting - everything else is pseudoscientific BS charlatans make up to rationalize it with things like "autophagy" and so on.
we humans ( and other carnivores ) evolved to starve most of the time and occasionally pig out. nibbling until half full is contrary to our nature, which is why everybody hates that and few can stick to it.
if any of you want to know more about nutrition ask me on my site here
https://dissidentsound.discoursehosting.net/c/health/nutrition/113
Trans Beauty Gabrielly Ferraz does Double Anal with Niggers
https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ph6389b4a3eb83f#1
relay.mostr.pub is the only relay anybody needs.
Russia has better natural resources and enjoyed better stability in recent decades compared to Ukraine ...
i want a Libertarian Utopia but without Niggers, Spics, Kebabs and Pajeets