Avatar
alphabet
9d28248d93acd991d78ab36deacdc9aa1525ade5bc4cc54d3b8a26bba98e84ea
small blocker
Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

What if humanity could find some alien tech and thus greatly accelerate its own technological progress? But what if that tech was hoarded by a small group of people?

Anyway, here's a review of Theft of Fire by Devon Eriksen. It's a 22nd century hard science space opera set in our solar system, written by a retired engineer. One of the more successful indie sci fi books in recent years. It's also one of the most successful books to have bitcoin in it; it's a small background role, but bitcoin is one of the leading types of money in the solar system.

Marcus, an indebted down-on-his-luck asteroid miner (and secretly, a bit of a space pirate as of late, given how bad things have gotten) finds his ship taken over by a wealthy genetically modified corporate heiress named Miranda. She has bought his defaulting debt contract that his ship collateralizes, and has gained admin access over his ship's computer. And she knows he is secretly a space pirate, which altogether gives her multiple types of leverage over him. She wants him to take her on a mission to the edge of the solar system to do something she won't say, involving unimaginable treasure, and he has little choice but to go along with it. Secretly, however, he plots how to regain control of his ship as they go, because he recognizes how much of a suicide mission it is because of who guards the space out there.

Pros:

-The hard scientific realism in the book is great. The type that basically takes an engineer to write. No wonder he has endorsements from like, the co-founder of Autocad and such. It's also a smooth read, all from Marcus's perspective.

-Although the story mostly takes place on one ship with a few characters, the worldbuilding is a solid start. I assume it'll be expanded later in the series. The technological situation and structure of society are very fleshed out relative to how little we actually see, given the tight setting. The world feels realistic and lived-in.

-High nostalgia factor. Fans of Firefly and Cowboy Bebop, and more recently the Expanse, and all sorts of classic sci fi literature over decades, will find a lot of references or similarities in a good way. The author is very well-read on the genre.

-The audiobook is pretty unique and great. Unlike most audiobooks, it has a full-cast production, meaning that each line of dialogue sounds like the person speaking it, rather than just one person reading a given chapter's narration and dialogue. I listened to this one rather than read it. You can only buy the audiobook on the author's website though, not Amazon/Audible. (Amazon/Audible have been kind of shitty to authors lately.) The other version of the book are available on Amazon.

-AI gets a really good treatment here, and the third main character, an AI, is my favorite character in the book.

-There's a lot of suspense throughout. Most of it is not really predictable how it's going to end since it doesn't follow a basic tropey structure. Even if you don't particularly like some of the characters (and indeed they're designed to be rather unlikable), you're likely to find yourself reading further to see what happens.

Cons:

-The book is about 500 pages, and I think 50+ could have been cut out of the middle to make it stronger. The dialogue between Marcus and Miranda gets rather repetitive after a while. And because of the limited setting (mostly on one ship), most of the worldbuilding is done via exposition by Marcus. So if readers hate "info dumps", they'll probably get annoyed at this. I personally don't really mind exposition as long as it's good, so this wasn't a dealbreaker for me (the "don't do exposition!" advice to authors is overdone in my view). I just think the middle could have used a trim. And although most of the book is not predictable, one aspect imo very much is, and that's where a lot of the repetition is.

-There are some unnerving aspects/scenes in it. I can't really say what they are without spoilers. Let's just say being in Marcus's head for 500 pages isn't, uh, my cup of tea. The book is self-aware about it, though. It's an intentional choice to have put these unnerving aspects in, so it's not a con per se but it's more something that will put off some readers. And it's a little more understandable by the end.

Overall, a unique story. And for the audiobook, I do think that over time more audiobooks will be made with this more complete type of cast. Audiobooks used to be very expensive and a small piece of the market, and only in recent years have they become very popular. As they become a bigger and bigger share of the fiction market up to some substantial percentage, I think more work will go into their quality and details.

I always look forward to your sci-fi reviews thank you so much.

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

GM.

Some people say that everything is good for Bitcoin. I almost, but not quite, agree.

Everything that fails to land a critical hit, is good for Bitcoin. What doesn't kill it, usually makes it stronger. The bigger and more robust it gets, the more resilient it is against even the idea of a critical hit, and that has required work. When threats materialize, programmers program, financiers finance, and podcasters podcast.

Bitcoin is a growing, robust ecosystem that responds to threats and hardens against them. Sometimes at the base layer, often at higher layers. It doesn't put too many premature resources against threats that aren't currently hurting it, but can swarm massive resources in response to something that does start to hurt it. Nobody's in control; it's a well-designed swarm of incentives trending toward life, and in this case life means functional operation as a permissionless and high-quality global ledger to store and transmit value (i.e. electronic cash).

I've long since viewed it in that self-healing way, since it's a similar lens to how I view the established macroeconomic system as well. People continually underestimate a lindy system's response functions against threats, for both good systems (like Bitcoin) and bad systems (like central banking). It took me a bit of time to be convinced that Bitcoin was lindy, but once I did, I haven't seen any reason to waver.

Bears doubt its robustness. Bulls consider it highly robust. I'm a bull. It's not that I consider it invincible though; it's that I consider it as having a high probability shot at resisting forces against it, and a better shot than any of its competitors.

And for those who don't know, my background is in electronics engineering with a control systems focus in my early engineering career, so the fact that I became enamored with the robustness of a decentralized money's inbuilt control system and the ecosystem surrounding it was no small hurdle. It probably contributed to my skepticism early on, but once my skepticism was satisfied, it instead contributed to my conviction.

I agree with those who say that one day state attacks will be the biggest threats against Bitcoiners. Not against Bitcoin's existence itself, most likely, but against its permissionless and private usage.

The defense against that comes from those writing high quality code that gives people tools to resist, educators and financiers that help expand them, as well as jurisdictional arbitrage as high-conviction people can and do move around between legal jurisdictions toward freer ones.

It'll be a longer process than many expect, I think. But the ecosystem is built for it, and attracts the best people to deal with it. And Nostr is currently part of its epicenter.

I fully agree. The transnational controls that governments are currently trying to implement will last longer than many expect. In particular, the United States has less physical power than it did decades ago, but when it comes to information—especially financial flows—its control has only grown stronger.

인류는 1800년대에 탄화수소, 전기, 그리고 통신 기술을 활용하는 방법을 알아냈고, 그 결과 1900년대에는 이 모든 것이 본격적으로 작동하면서 기술과 인구에서 전례 없는 성장을 이루었다.

그러자 경제학자들은 이렇게 말했다. “와, 명목화폐가 인류에게 얼마나 이로운지 좀 봐.”

nostr:nevent1qqsyk45ag73an904k9scvur286zepdjq0ludu9l84p44m6m97c3cmzqpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgx70h0u

어제.. 나이가 30대 중반쯤 된, 조카가 놀러왔습니다.

20대땐, 돈관리에 관해 조언을 해줘도..

듣는둥 마는둥 했는데.. 지금은 눈빛이 변했더군요ㅋ

재정상황에 맞게 조언을 해주고, 저녁을 먹고.. 밥상치우고 온사이에..제 책상에 필레몬님 책을 보더니

“삼촌, 비트코인해? 😳" 표정이 가관이었네요 완전 충격먹은 표정ㅋㅋㅋㅋ

...순간... 정적....

(얘한테 뭐라 말해야 할까..?😦)

제가

“지금은 아마 말해도 모를거야 😅, 그냥 전에 말해준대로만 S&P ETF 사~”하고 급하게 마무리.

잠시후..

열심히 자기 할일을 마친 아이들에게,

제가

“아그들 잘했쒀 !! 500 원씩 줄께!! 지갑 가져와~“

(우리집에선 사토시=원, 원화는 “마트에서 쓰는돈”ㅋㅋ)

말이 떨어지자 바삐 인보이스를 만드는 아이들, 작은아이가 1,000원 인보이스를 만드니 ㅋㅋ 큰아이가 왜 넌 1,000원 받냐며, 얼른 다시 만드는걸 알려줌🤣

조카도 이걸 지켜봄 ㅎㅎㅋ

갈 시간이 되서, 마중나가는 길에..

조카가

“잘 모르겠어, 근데 삼촌이 비트코인하니까, 분명 이유가 있을거라 생각해, 책보면 알 수있어?뭐해야해?”

( 제가 생각하기에 제 인생이 평범하지만, 조카는 저를 멘탈무적에 갖은 고생 다하며 버틴, 대단한 사람이라고 함ㅎㅎ, 그래서 저를 잘 믿고 따름니다ㅋ)

...조카가 책은 제대로 안 볼께 뻔하기에..

유튜브에 비트코인 검색하라고 했고, 거기에 검색된 것들은 ‘절대’ 보면 안된다고 말했습니다ㅋ - 때민이 영상이 절반이상 ㅋㅋㅋ

그리고 바로 생각이난 내딸바님,벅차는비트코인님,라이프이즈굿님 채널 구독 눌러주고,무조건 이것만 보라고 하고 집에 보냈습니다 ㅎㅎ

휴.. 될까요?? 오렌지필이??

저도 모르겠습니다...😂

지금은 아마 말해도 모를꺼야 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

진짜 품격있는 대화네요 ㅋㅋㅋ

요즘 도덕적 공황에 완전히 몰두하는 게 유행이지만, 저는 비트코인이 현재 기술적으로 좋은 위치에 있다고 생각합니다. 저는 낙관적입니다.

코어 개발자들이 좋은 일을 하고 있다고 생각합니다. 그리고 사람들이 코어를 좋아하지 않으면 Knots를 실행하거나 포크할 수 있어서 다행입니다. 그게 비트코인을 튼튼하게 만들고, 유용한 시장/채택 신호를 제공하는 부분입니다.

마이닝 풀 중앙화는 이상적이진 않지만, 네트워크에 더 방해가 된다면 사용할 수 있는 선택적 도구들이 많고, 경제적 신호(예: 검열된 거래에 대한 높은 수수료 가능성)가 바로 그 상황에서 문제를 해결하는 데 도움이 되도록 존재합니다.

현재 기능은 훌륭하다고 생각하지만, 사람들이 그 주변에서 합의를 이룬다면 CTV+CSFS가 그 위에 추가로 합리적인 업그레이드라고 생각합니다.

가끔은 해가 떠 있죠. ☀️

nostr:nevent1qqsw9hst6z7sr26yg5y5h3vcvd25hv3dk4gu3hyktd7uwfkmg9yvp8spzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgsla6nt

I still get asked, “What if a better Bitcoin comes along?”

But the truth is, dozens of “better” Bitcoins have already come.

The code Satoshi wrote has already been heavily modified, and it will continue to evolve.

In a sense, we may already be using the 28th successor to Bitcoin—and most people just call it “Bitcoin.”

A more accurate way to put it is this:

We call “Bitcoin” the chain that the majority of people recognize and collectively maintain.

So it’s not that a second Bitcoin is impossible—it’s that any future version will still have to acknowledge and preserve the existing ledger.

That’s the real explanation.

더 나은 비트코인이 나오면 어쩌냐는 질문을 아직도 받습니다.

제2 제3의 비트코인은 수없이 나왔고, 나오고 있습니다. 사토시가 쓴 코드는 이미 상당수 새로 수정되었습니다. 앞으로도 계속 변할

것이구요. 어쩌면 우리는 28번째 비트코인을쓰고 있는 것일 수도 있습니다.

더 정확한 설명은 사람들이 장부를 유지하며 가장 많이 인정하는 체인을 ‘비트코인’이라 부르는 것이기 때문에 제2의 비트코인이 불가능하다기 보다는 다음 비트코인들도 기존 장부를 인정할 수밖에 없다는 게 더 논리적인해설이라 생각합니다.