What do I watch instead?

And so it is…

Exactly. It’s Nostr. Free speech is allowed.

Get used to it.

They're not. A word is either god given or devil given. Nothing in between.

I think if US officially hodls bitcoin as a reserve asset that would substantially establish it as part of the global financial system forever, and that doesn't feel far fetched at all.

Just as good and a bonus would be if he actively advocates to protect its free / private use - and reverses the trend to criminalization etc, and again that doesn't feel unlikley if he gets in.

why are you talking to me then?

anyone who supports war for any circumstance can go fuck themselves. I also will call them a faggot.

lmao you must be new here

Bitcoiners should be embarrassed that the largest global conference that represents this industry has turned into a giant Trump rally. Hitching your cart to a malignant narcissist is a very bad look, and it eclipses all of the hard apolitical work that has been done up to this point and still needs to be done to further adoption.

Again you and your things at face value.

But it does not matter because these are just some trigger words I use to call somebody I don't know at all, just because he calls other people unsuitable cliche names. Especially that word narcissist is a fake word invented by the Matrix to suppress people that rightiously and adequately are proud of something as they should be. Anyone using this word in any context is an unaware slave of the Matrix playing into its hands.

It's the other way round - the us election has become a(nother) bitcoin Trojan horse operation.

If trump brings bitcoin fully into the global financial system without the decade of conflict I was expecting before government capitulated, then anything else he might do is completely irrelevant - and anyone who cares about humanity should root for him and do anything in their power to bring about his election

GFY faggot

He is not a narcissist. You are a negro zionist faggot.

At the moment he is way bigger than bitcoin. So he does not use bitcoin for popularity. He uses himself to increase popularity of bitcoin.

You and all your friends should do a progressive fork for bitcoin faggot.

THE ONLY REASON TRUTH SOCIAL HAS ANY USERS IS BECAUSE THERE IS A DUDE WHO POSTS THERE EXCLUSIVELY.

OFTEN IN CAPS.

today i learned

how do you guys feel about being called buddy

I personally dislike it

1. If belief A and B are the same, then it isn’t a stretch. To believe in gun control is to explicitly believe in the state monopoly on gun violence and to support their direct violent use against its citizens. It’s even in their actual words most of the time, they project whatever hate and anger they have against some murderer onto every innocent person who owns a gun, and some of the shit they openly say “should be done to gun owners” is horrifying. When someone tells you who they are, believe them.

2. If you think guns don’t play a part in the state vs citizen power dynamic then I believe you’ve made a massive miscalculation. People are the same as they’ve always been. The *difference* in power is exactly what causes arrogant tyrants to become more bold and reinforces their worldview that the weak citizens are subjects of the state, not sovereign individuals. The overwhelming violence that follows gun control is something that builds very slowly for a long time, and then explodes all at once. If you are looking at the “very slowly” era and saying things are different, you are just like millions before you in history who made the same mistake. This would not even slightly be the first time people said “it’s different now, we don’t need guns because the state is on our side.” To the contrary this is said EVERY time with the same predictable results. If they didn’t think that, then it wouldn’t have happened.

To the contrary, regardless of how much conflict happens over information and perception, its entire purpose is to control what people allow for direct violence. It doesn’t obsolete guns, it decides who gets to use them with the benefit of appearing like they are “the good guys.”

An armed population remains an irreplaceable deterrent of aggressive, direct state violence against the people. And no, this time is not different.