For the record... Nanoblocks suck. Feels like I'm writing on rice.
https://open.spotify.com/track/6lT7vLs5NQchHMe8Zfc0Ww?
#Trump2024 #Bitcoin
How do you fund rocket technology in peacetime?
How do you own the airspace without satellites?
How do you launch a payload of satellites sitting on top of a ballistic missile without causing your global neighbors to panic?
NASA is the answer to all of these questions. It's not money laundering as much as it is a cleverly disguised military secret out in the open.
The irony of a crowd that enjoys burning the American flag while considering tire marks over a gay pride flag painted on the street "unspeakable"...
You have to laugh. Truly though, taking the rainbow, a symbol of the covenant between God and Man, and converting it to a symbol of "Pride" (Lucifer's original sin) is a stroke of marketing genius.
Basically, yes. Or close and reopen a larger channel.
You can't send or receive an amount larger than a channels capacity but I'll be honest, I'm not sure what the behavior would be if you had a large number of small channels and tried to send a large amount. Could work 🤷♂️
Personally, I prefer to have at least 2 well funded channels with well connected nodes.
Oof... I get the delemna. I agree, there's some work to do. Lots to unpack there. First, I will say, that strike is a great option. They do a great job of abstracting most of the Bitcoin confusion away from the user and just let them use the payment rails seamlessly. It's beautiful. It's the app that I use to onboard people to Bitcoin.
But, the ethos of Bitcoin is self-custody and strike is custodial. You can't get into self-custody until you take the time to understand how Bitcoin works. Many of the apps that are built can't abstract that piece because users need the ability to connect to their set-ups (nodes).
As far as L1/ L2... "Lightning" is basically a smart contract between two parties. It creates a relationship on L1 for a fixed amount. This is why with most wallets, you first fund the wallet, then you open a channel. Once the channel is opened, you'll have outbound liquidity. It's like opening a tab at the bar. You can make payments to the bar, but you can't really receive payments that way.
You don't really "fund L2" as much as you are opening a payment channel using L1. I guess people say "funded" because the funds are now locked into a payment channel. That network of payment channels is the lightning network.
There's no getting around the fact that once you get into self-custody, the waters get very deep, very fast. Personally, I do believe that custodial services will be a must in this space as much as it pains me. The average user is just not going to go through all of this.
So detection rate is mediocre but confidence level in the accuracy detection, once detected, is high. High confidence there are rarely false positives... But false negatives are possible. 😂
Got it. Let's hit the casinos...
Agreed. He is head and shoulders above any other political figure of my lifetime as well. What is the general opinion of Trump for most Europeans?
But since we're on the topic... why does a Swede living in Portugal have such interest in American politics; specifically Trump?
Depends on the topic I suppose. I've seen a lot of people building brilliant things.
The politics... That's a crapshoot.
Meh... We're early to the party. But honestly, the people are fairly brilliant. Just young and ideological.
First time I've heard this take. Why do you say Torvalds virus?