a3
Frodo
a366b6ae9eea0c27daacb16f8e2fe88733e88ebe59cc77f3c41f8bec2df78f17
The chief end of man is to glorify God and enjoy him forever.
Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

One of the things that I find most troubling is audience capture.

People who work in corporations have to toe the party line. But then people who go ā€œindependentā€ often get captured by the most vocal parts of their audience. They often just get paid to rebel against whatever they left, and become as much one-sided as they previously were.

In its most benign state, many people with audiences will just not comment on certain things. They fear their audience. There is no positive ROI in it. When asked point blank, they will try to deflect. In the worst state, they will actively and consciously deceive, playing to their audience.

I can’t promise I will always be right on things. Sometimes I will be wrong.

But what I will promise is that I will always tell it like I see it. So when people agree or disagree with me, my goal is that at least they know it’s genuine.

I aggressively resist audience and platform capture.

I started talking about US fiscal deficits being the key macro issue to watch in the first Trump term. Then for four years during the Biden term I amplified it and started the ā€œnothing stops this (fiscal) trainā€ meme.

When Trump became president again, and Musk talked about specific deficit reductions by 2026, I re-iterated my view that they will fail, and that the deficits will continue.

When I was talking about deficits during the Biden term, I got a ton of comments saying I was too right wing. But they were in the minority vs those who found value in the commentary. And it was right. And then during the early Trump term I got a wave of critics saying I was some liberal. But I said it’s just math, your guy is wrong too like the prior guy, so I say it like it is.

When Musk took over Twitter I was cautiously optimistic at first, but then I pointed out that the platform was increasing its rate of censoring Indian and Turkish posts compared to prior management at the behest of their governments that are also potential rocket and car buyers. They did this while simultaneously broadcasting themselves as the new free speech platform in the US. I took heat for pointing this out on his own platform but I felt it important to do so. These various knee-jerk social movements are so shallow.

I am wealthy enough to not need income anymore, but purposely am not so high-up in anything that I have a gazillion employees that could get rekt if I don’t bend the knee to some asshole. I run a profitable, lean, wholly owned company by me, and have some additional partnerships.

I don’t take that middle ground lightly. People more hardcore than me chose not to take it. Too many employees eat because of those leaders. Meanwhile, I use time to analyze whatever it is I’m looking at.

The latest event is bitcoin spam.

Some folks want to increase the expressivity of bitcoin to put more spam in there. I disagree with that.

Other folks are mad at the spam that’s already in there, and want to censor it. I disagree with that approach too.

Many influencers are afraid to even wade into the debate and tell you their opinion.

I’m happy to talk and reply. Not that it really matters, but in case you care, since most of this is on social media anyway and I haven’t pushed anything hard and broad yet but have watched and analyzed it.

My first article on bitcoin in 2017 was interested but not committed. After Bitcoin’s price stagnated for several years and went through the blocksize war, my second article was strongly bullish. I basically said to buy the fuck out of this thing. It proved itself to have a dominant network effect and to be antifragile.

We are up 16x since then; and I’m still bullish. I don’t view any of the attacks as existential. I fade all of the moral panics that I currently see.

The JPEG attacks are weak, the token attacks are weak, etc. All of this is from 2 years ago and still weak now. NFTs and memecoins are weak as fuck.

Fees are low because16 years into Bitcoin’s existence, it is still less than 1% of Fedwire transfer volumes. And it’s normal to be low until Bitcoin cash balances rival gold’s or Fedwire’s at even 10%.

Part of why I am bullish is because until Bitcoin has another10x and becomes a common cash balance at scale, it will remain a niche spending unit.

I don’t agree that everything is good for Bitcoin. However, I am 90% there.

Everything that fails to break Bitcoin is good for Bitcoin. I am bullish on Bitcoin, having witnessed yet another attack crash upon its shores.

For those that are concerned about spam, I would 1) remind you of the existing blocksize limit, 2) point out that UTXO bloat is not occurring since the fad went out and Runes launched, and 3) few of the existing proponents represent permanent fixes.

Bitcoin can withstand this weak sauce. That’s why I bought it in the first place.

Good on you, Lyn

Not quite as pithy, but making the same point, AI agrees, The passage you quoted is from Alan Greenspan, who served as the Chairman of the Federal Reserve from 1987 to 2006. This excerpt is from his essay titled "Gold and Economic Freedom," which was published in 1966. In this essay, Greenspan discusses the relationship between the gold standard, economic freedom, and the implications of inflation and government monetary policy on wealth and property rights.

An almost hysterical antagonism toward the gold standard is one issue which unites statists of all persuasions. They seem to sense—perhaps more clearly and subtly than many consistent defenders of laissez-faire—that gold and economic freedom are inseparable, that the gold standard is an instrument of laissez-faire and that each implies and requires the other.

In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value. If there were, the government would have to make its holding illegal, as was done in the case of gold. If everyone decided, for example, to convert all his bank deposits to silver or copper or any other good, and thereafter declined to accept checks as payment for goods, bank deposits would lose their purchasing power and government-created bank credit would be worthless as a claim on goods. The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves.

This is the shabby secret of the welfare statists’ tirades against gold. Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights. If one grasps this, one has no difficulty in understanding the statists’ antagonism toward the gold standard.

According to DuckDuckGo AI (using GPT-4o-mini) : The quote ā€œBy a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizensā€ is attributed to Friedrich Hayek, an Austrian-British economist and philosopher known for his defense of classical liberalism and free-market capitalism. This statement reflects Hayek's views on the effects of inflation and government monetary policy on individual wealth. It is often cited in discussions about the consequences of inflation and government intervention in the economy.

The quote you mentioned is often associated with Friedrich Hayek, but it is not a direct quote from John Maynard Keynes. However, Hayek did critique Keynesian economics and discussed the implications of inflation in his works.

The specific phrase you referenced does not appear to be a direct quotation from Keynes, but rather a summary of Hayek's views on the effects of inflation. Hayek's critiques of Keynesian economics can be found in his works such as "The Road to Serfdom" and "Prices and Production."

If you are looking for a specific instance where Hayek might have referenced Keynes in relation to inflation, it would be best to consult Hayek's writings directly, as he often engaged with Keynesian ideas throughout his career.

Instrumentals are more approachable, the vocals are an acquired taste worth

the effort IMO

Agree that Bitcoin manifests moral ideals and the awareness it fosters is revolutionary. Let’s speak provocatively about it without idolizing it.

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

Most posts I make on Nostr feel to some extent like a challenge. And I post them anyway. I enjoy that challenge. I write them in part *because* they are challenging.

I'm putting uncomfortable thoughts into the decentralized Nostr void to anyone who wants to host what I say on their relay.

That's why I'm here. I'm adding my thoughts to this medium to help advance it. I write here the things I wouldn't post to the normies on Twitter/X. Only on Nostr do I embrace my weirdness and inappropriateness. I analyzed this ecosystem, and decided that you, and only you, yes you reading this who took the time to be here, deserved to see my real or "based" thoughts to the extent that you care about them. And that includes my weaknesses. I've shown those in some of my recent posts, and I'll continue to show you my weaknesses here. I wrote about the times I got rekt in a fight and cried. I'll type that kind of thing out here, and only here, on Nostr, again and again.

If I post something intellectually polarizing I start to think, "what would my followers think?" But then I'm immediately like, "I don't know. Who cares. If they hate my truths here then were they even real my followers to begin with? Maybe they need to be challenged."

Meanwhile, I *do* care what you all think in aggregate, am willing to disagree with you individually on certain topics, but want to hear your thoughts. And I'm willing to change my views based on you. In fact, many of my Twitter/X posts are there over the past years because I want to see what people comment with before I write my full-on reports. The same is likely true for Nostr. This is raw ground. I want your thoughts. I won't bend my truths toward you, and I'll challenge you, as I expect you to challenge me.

So, if someone takes the effort to be on Nostr and some how reads this, I want them in my ecosystem. I want their criticisms as much as their praise. Criticize me here. I'll enjoy it. Let's go. You're awesome.

And then I'm like "What about my business contacts?" I have like these various billionaire institutional close contacts that are richer than me but have to wear ties to work. But I mean, if they are reading this right now, they are fucking awesome. I think, any of my serious existing business contacts who are cool enough to be here, are likely people I want to continue to work with. If they don't like what I say, they can bring it up with me. Otherwise they can appreciate my rawness here, and recognize that Nostr is where I post my random thoughts or my deep thoughts, and either of which are my raw thoughts.

My goal is to be real, and to advanced this protocol.

The day that far more people are on Nostr, is the day I will practice more public moderation. Until then, and that's probably far away, it's the medium where I will drop f-bombs and describe weird situations and thoughts. Let's go.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akPbu6TOx2E&ab_channel=JerisJohnson

Have been following (subscriber) you on the normie side for 2 years. Appreciate this ā€œwindow into your soulā€ on the Nostr side. Broken Money is great so far. Blessings

Replying to Avatar Derek Ross

It's been a while since I've posted something like this for the new Nostriches out there. First of all, welcome to Nostr! We're glad that you're here with us in the decentralized social future of communication.

We don't have algorithms here to bring our content forward, so that means that you must put in the work here on Nostr to get the most out of it, to have the most success here so that you're not feeling like you're posting into the void. Nostr puts you in control of your social graph for the very first time. This means you're going to have to put in a little effort here. You're in control of both your data and your own social interactions. Nothing is spoon fed to you here.

This means that you're going to want to follow a lot of people. 1000 is a good number. You're also going to want to engage with people often on their notes and your own notes. That way your comments are seen often and your notes stay fresh in people's minds. Next, you're going to want to boost your own notes, sometimes, throughout the day, if it's a good one! If you posted something that's a just pure fire and you think more people should see it, boost it yourself in 4 hours or so, enabling others around the globe to find it and see it.

Hashtags are a great way to find new and interesting people and their content. You can follow #grownostr for (hopefully) new and exciting non-Bitcoin content and you can follow #plebchain if you're a Bitcoin pleb looking to connect with other like-minded folks. If you like food, check out #foodstr for delicious food pics. If you like feet, well, we have #footstr here too šŸ˜† We have plenty of hashtags that people post to often. You just need to find and follow them šŸ˜‰

Thanks! Suggestions for top 250 to follow? Who on nostr puts out home miner DYI?

In terms of a man’s obligation to his fellow man, could polygamy be detrimental to one’s fellow man depriving some men of having a wife?

Ok. Is that logic exclusively focused on one man’s obligation to another man? Another words is the prohibition of extramarital sex based upon any other moral grounds?