Bip47 is the shit!
Sucking on his own penis!
Using custodial wallet?
How do you know that wallet of satoshi is not owned by wef or Klaus Schwab?
Taproot activation was rushed and cross input signature aggregation was not even included into it.
Why does it matter in dollar equivalent?
One does not measure wealth in US dollars.
We need bitcoin to separate government control from text data and speech.
Yes check out zeus telegram there is a post there about using Zeus with square pos https://t.me/zeusLN
https://twitter.com/ZeusLN/status/1625216596737228800?cxt=HHwWgIC8ucn49o0tAAAA
Zeus and square
Because I never had Twitter and never will. This is what I wanted to see when MySpace first came out.
How are you funding that lighting wallet? On chain tx must be made to open a lightning channel. Therefore there is no privacy unless one uses whirlpool to begin with everything else is not private but bunch of bologny.
Only Whirlpool allow you do break deterministic links to your bitcoin's previous history, and provide you with forward and backward looking privacy. When spending bitcoin after using Whirlpool (from your postmix wallet account), it makes it extremely difficult for anyone to gain information relating to your bitcoin prior to it entering Whirlpool. So if your onchain footprint is shit your lightning opening Tx will be linked to your id especially if one sends to open a lightning channel directly from an exchange wallet.
Did you even asked these questions or know about this?
Ordinal is an attack on Bitcoin fungibility where in the end the state will decide, which coins are good or "tainted".
It is a made up accounting system, which technically enables tracing back Sats(ordinal) back to inception. First in first out basically a perfect dream for state actors to agree on this to foster KYC rules/regulations. Number go up plebs will obey and comply because of institutional money/mass adaptions.
Why waste brain cells for this?
If they closed it and it was a forced close initiator will be paying higher fees by default. But looks like you just have to wait now.
the absolute worst case the unconfirmed transaction will simply disappear from the network, as if it never happened. Keep in mind that the your sats never actually leave your wallet. Itβs just that your wallet doesnβt show them as βavailableβ, but you still have options like RBF and CPFP to get your transaction confirmed with higher fees, or to βcancelβ your transaction by spending the same coins onto another address with a higher fee.
A transaction with very low fee rate might also disappear from the network if the mempool goes over 300MB in size, because by default a Bitcoin Core node will purge transactions from its internal mempool, starting with the lowest fee rates first, while increasing its minimum acceptable fee rates that it will broadcast further. even if the transaction has been forgotten by most nodes and doesn't appear anymore on blockexplorers, it is still a valid transaction and might have stayed in the mempool of a node somewhere. So it's better to use one of the inputs in another transaction to invalidate the original, "stuck" transaction (otherwise you risk it to be re-broadcast and be confirmed when you already forgot about it).
read more https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/96068/what-if-the-mempool-exceeds-300-mb/96070#96070