Monero doesn't address those issues of security budget, scaling with L2 channels, and social attacks/bad actors
Also I'd argue that if nodes aren't able to IBD (in a few days) or even sync after IBD behind Tor / limited bandwidth environments then decentralization is substantially hurt
Monero looks to be going in this direction.
Bitcoin is the one that limits subnets while Monero does not really have good protections against this except for the ban list which seems to be getting circumvented.
If there's spam attacks or large adoption increase post FCMP upgrade then node resources requirements will stop a lot of people from running nodes. It could be more akin to Ethereum nodes.
Monero Txs are 50x the size iirc, and require more compute. so I think the total on chain Txs will be similar to Bitcoin at the cost of being more resource intensive
Monero devs don't really value node costs being low (measure of decentralization)
large CEX still list derivatives and low liquidity means high volatility
just self-custody for freedom? Or is private non-kyc utxos also required?
I'm sure there's subreddits where buyers and sellers meet, also there is porn subscriptions so I don't see why all three of these wouldn't be DNMs. Just different rules for each platform.
Actually anyone could proxy a market to an onion domain and it wouldn't be possible to know otherwise. Therefore, you couldn't actually prove any online shopping isn't a DNM. right?
So when Facebook, reddit, Pornhub, etc had onion domains were those DNMs?
Evidence against reusing a monero wallet: “If you need perfect unlinkability of your receivables, the only solution remains to use a separate seed (separate Monero wallet).” source: https://docs.getmonero.org/public-address/subaddress/
Evidence against reusing a monero address: “To prevent the payer from linking your payouts together [you must] generate a new subaddress for each payout.” source: https://docs.getmonero.org/public-address/subaddress/
Evidence for running a monero node, not a phone wallet: “It's always advisable, especially for privacy-conscious users, to use a personal node when transacting on the network to achieve the highest rate of privacy.” source: https://www.getmonero.org/get-started/faq/
Evidence of difficulty of using monero on tor: 
Lots of more privacy problems listed on the OFFICIAL getmonero website. Lightning does not have these issues. Admits monero users will be POOR:
"If you use Monero but give your name and address to another party, the other party will not magically forget your name and address."
"If you give out your secret keys, others will know what you've done. If you get compromised, others will be able to keylog you."
"If you backup your seed in the cloud, you'll be poorer soon"
read it for yourself!
source:
Honestly think this one of the good things about Zcash, they already chose the doxxed/public/corporate route, why not play in DC? Worse case it does nothing, not sure how it justifies more crackdowns.
90's crypto wars wasnt just about writing code iirc, it was also about fighting for laws that protect fundamental rights or removing ones that dont
Tor stops censorship of the country you're in, it makes no promises about the country you're going out of 😂
don't understand that last bit, I agree individuals owning is better than banks/companies.
It wouldn't be like japanese in 1942/immigrants today I think it would simply be like going after tax fraud, Bitcoiners as a whole aren't problem, just the ones that don't give the gov what they ask for.
I'm curious, can Bitcoin still separate money from state if the state knows who all (most) the Bitcoin belongs to? (whether institutions or individuals)
"There aren't any wallet aggregations on the blockchain unless you combine utxos."
Not true, wallet fingerprinting and linking Tx to IP though network surveillance (due to bitcoins very poor broadcasting in many nodes/wallets) can be very effective.
"They do chainalysis on monero too."
Yes they do. Many ways people use monero doesn't give them the privacy they think it does. For example, instantly swapping in and out of xmr to 'wash' coins. Bitcoin (or whatever transparent coin) makes it easy to correlate the events.
"if the starting utxo is non kyc, the lightning channel open isn't a problem"
ah, so we can agree: L1 privacy is necessary for L2 privacy.
Now, I just want L1 privacy by default.
"the market has spoken"
let's look at the market
non-bitcoin market cap -> $1.3Trillion
eth -> $350 Billion
xrp -> $120 Billion
doge -> $20 Billion
A total clown show
Monero not found on the top 5 exchanges, was delisted or never listed on ~60 out of top 87 exchanges, and the ones it is found on remove for regions like EU/EEA under MiCA, and others like Canada, Australia, Iceland, SEA, etc.... while still maintaining top 20-30 market cap
Bitcorn pump is coming from blackrock, ETFs, treasuries companies, other captured institutions, and so on... all the non-free markets. They all need PERMISSION to hodl and they operate under the whims of the jurisdiction they reside.
Many of these 'hodlers' of Bitcorn would swap it out in an instant to xrp/sol/shit under a different series of slogans and meaningless jargon for why it's the new shinny object to get a hold of.
Yes, the state-regulated market which thrives on control and surveillance picks Bitcoin as its king and Monero as its enemy.
"if the base layer yanks your pants down the whole stack is suspect."
This AI is diabolical 😂 😂 😂
Just an example... Also if you're broke just say so. (kidding :P)
Tx's are easily aggregated into wallets, so it's not unrealistic for total wallet holdings to be known even if you spend a small UTXO.
Lightning tx's can be linked to the UTXO used to open the channel. Network surveillance, traffic/amount correlations, and data from the large liquidity providers (Who are CEXs like Binance or other doxxed entities that must comply with blockchain Intel companies).
But for fun let's say specific methods are unknown or unclear. In 2020 IRS paid out $500,000+ to two blockchain surveillance firms to work on tracing (breaking the privacy) of Bitcoin layer 2s - Lightning in specific. So at least realize that highly capable adverseries that receive hefty amounts of gov. funding have been working on these attacks for some time.


