Avatar
Good Life Seek
af0b3bcacd108ba0eed11030fca65bb952679735a49d8a55154c61a558cde7bc
good life, peace of mind, freedom, achievement, contentment, philosophy, health, truth

Is there a way for me to build my own feed algorithm on NOSTR?

Is it this DVM-related?

Could I, for example, build a code to show me posts, sorted by relevancy score, defined by me, with points based on number of zaps and comments, etc?

How could I get started experimenting, if I wanted to build it?

Or maybe it exists already?

#asknostr

I would do much love this to be true and this scenario to actually happen.

I hope it will happen.

That is, Bitcoin wins, governments cannot finance wars with printed money, Bitcoin cannot be taken by force, so, as a result, there are no more wars.

But I worry it will not happen. Look, let's simplify and think game theory model.

Let's say there are two countries.

One of them if peaceful, respects human rights, freedom, protects it's citizens, adopts Bitcoin standard, has low taxes, and prosperity. People are affluent and comfortable.

But the neighbor country has a million people army, poor people willing to die, and does not hesitate to use force.

What happens? Who wins?

Even if the peaceful country has technical superiority, better airplanes, but the other country has a million army and thousands of tanks, what happens?

I don't know.

The history tells me that empires will fight for their spheres of influence.

By diplomacy, propaganda, bluff, soft power, and kinetic war.

I doubt this will end.

And I even worry that the country that does not invest in defense, will be invaded. Which may mean that taxes to fund the military are needed. Or be a vassal state, exploited by the powers.

I'd like to be wrong.

Anyway.

With Strike, you can pay in Bitcoin, via Lightning, from your fiat cash balance.

I like it this way.

I can contribute to merchant adoption by paying in Bitcoin, and there is no tax event of selling Bitcoin, and I get to keep my Bitcoin.

Replying to Avatar Anarko

🌊 SURF 'N TURF 🏝️

-THE BITCOIN ISLAND LIFE-

In a world obsessed with positivity and success, Mark Manson’s The Subtle Art of Not Giving a Fck* delivers a refreshing wake-up call.

Instead of chasing endless happiness, he argues that true freedom comes from choosing what truly deserves your attention and letting go of the rest.

The book challenges conventional self-help advice, urging readers to embrace failure, pain, and struggle as essential parts of a meaningful life. By shifting focus from superficial success to deep values and personal responsibility, Manson presents a counterintuitive yet liberating approach to happiness and fulfillment.

10 Lessons from the Book

1. Choose Your Struggles Wisely

Happiness doesn’t come from avoiding problems but from picking the right problems to solve. Instead of chasing comfort, focus on meaningful challenges that align with your values.

2. You Only Have So Many F*cks to Give

Your time and energy are limited. Stop wasting them on things that don’t matter—social validation, status, or petty worries. Be intentional about what you care about.

3. The Pursuit of Happiness is a Trap

Trying too hard to be happy often backfires. Instead of obsessing over happiness, accept that suffering is part of life and find fulfillment through purpose, growth, and resilience.

4. Failure is the Foundation of Growth

The more you fail, the more you learn. Every success is built on failure, so embrace mistakes as stepping stones rather than fearing them.

5. You Are Not Special—And That’s Okay

Believing you’re exceptional can lead to entitlement and unrealistic expectations. Accepting that you are average in most things helps you focus on improving what actually matters.

6. Uncertainty is Power

The ability to say “I don’t know” is a strength. Being open to learning, changing, and growing makes you more adaptable and wise. Certainty is often an illusion.

7. Responsibility Over Victimhood

You may not control everything that happens to you, but you are always responsible for your response. Taking ownership of your life leads to empowerment and real change.

8. Saying No is More Important Than Saying Yes

Defining what you stand for means rejecting distractions, toxic relationships, and meaningless goals. Saying “no” allows you to say “yes” to what truly matters.

9. Death is the Ultimate Motivator

Recognizing your mortality puts everything into perspective. Instead of wasting time on trivial concerns, invest in relationships, passions, and values that outlast you.

10. Stop Seeking Approval and Start Living Authentically

Caring too much about others' opinions leads to anxiety and inauthenticity. True freedom comes from living in alignment with your core values, even if it means disappointing others.

The essence of The Subtle Art of Not Giving a Fck* isn’t about apathy—it’s about caring deeply, but only about what truly matters. When you let go of external pressures and embrace struggle, failure, and imperfection, you unlock a life of meaning, freedom, and fulfillment.

Credits Goes to the respective

Author ✍️/ Photographer📸

🐇 🕳️

#Bitcoin #Freedom #Apocalypse #Music #Movies #Philosophy #Literature #dogstr #islands #scuba #marinelife #architecture

Very good book

Very good summary

Thanks

Yes but it is they, the politicians, unfortunately, who decide how much taxes they demand we pay, or they use force to collect them.

It is a difficult case.

Armed revolution is unrealistic.

Voting harder may not do much either.

Hiding in the grey markets, parallel economy, paying with non-KYC Bitcoin and avoiding taxes, while many people here would say is the way to go, I do see two issues with it.

One, you have to hide and accept the risk you get caught and forced to pay severe fine for tax evasion.

Two, I do not think it is morally and long term evidently 100 percent good. Of course I'm aware of the corruption and waste by politicians.

And yet, I do want the government to provide police, military and courts of law, to defend me from criminals, foreign invaders, and resolve disputes without the use of force.

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

When it comes to AI, philosophical people often ask "What will happen to people if they lack work? Will they find it hard to find meaning in such a world of abundance?"

But there is a darker side to the question, which people intuit more than they say aloud.

In all prior technological history, new technologies changed the nature of human work but did not displace the need for human work. The fearful rightly ask: what happens if we make robots, utterly servile, that can outperform the majority of humans at most tasks with lower costs? Suppose they displace 70% or 80% of human labor to such an extent that 70% or 80% of humans cannot find another type of economic work relative to those bots.

Now, the way I see it, it's a lot harder to replace humans than most expect. Datacenter AI is not the same as mobile AI; it takes a couple more decades of Moore's law to put a datacenter supercomputer into a low-energy local robot, or it would otherwise rely on a sketchy and limited-bandwidth connection to a datacenter. And it takes extensive physical design and programming which is harder than VC bros tend to suppose. And humans are self-repairing for the most part, which is a rather fantastic trait for a robot. A human cell outcompetes all current human technology in terms of complexity. People massively over-index what robots are capable of within a given timeframe, in my view. We're nowhere near human-level robots for all tasks, even as we're close to them for some tasks.

But, the concept is close enough to be on our radar. We can envision it in a lifetime rather than in fantasy or far-off science fiction.

So back to my prior point, the darker side of the question is to ask how humans will treat other humans if they don't need them for anything. All of our empathetic instincts were developed in a world where we needed each other; needed our tribe. And the difference between the 20% most capable and 20% least capable in a tribe wasn't that huge.

But imagine our technology makes the bottom 20% economic contributes irrelevant. And then the next 20%. And then the next 20%, slowly moving up the spectrum.

What people fear, often subconsciously rather than being able to articulate the full idea, is that humanity will reach a point where robots can replace many people in any economic sense; they can do nothing that economicall outcomes a bot and earns an income other than through charity.

And specifically, they wonder what happens at the phase when this happens regarding those who own capital vs those that rely on their labor within their lifetimes. Scarce capital remains valuable for a period of time, so long as it can be held legally or otherwise, while labor becomes demonetized within that period. And as time progresses, weak holders of capital who spend more than they consume, also diminish due to lack of labor, and many imperfect forms of capital diminish. It might even be the case that those who own the robots are themselves insufficient, but at least they might own the codes that control them.

Thus, people ultimately fear extinction, or being collected into non-economic open-air prisons and given diminishing scraps, resulting in a slow extinction. And they fear it not from the robots themselves, but from the minority of humans who wield the robots.

Historically, innovations created more jobs, in different areas.

This time, indeed, may be different because almost any new job type I can think, any way of creating value, AI may be better at it.

Except, I guess, human touch. People may value some things more, just because these things are human-created.

I would, unfortunately, probably, value each of the lifetimes less.

Each world have less value because there would be more of them.

Thank you.

I have also just added it to bookmarks, to read again in a while. All the best.

Yes, but, if you pay with Bitcoin, it is a tax event.

I know many people here have a sentiment that taxation if theft, don't pay, use non KYC only, etc.

I appreciate it. I share it, to an extent.

But, I don't want to need to "hide".

I don't want the stress that years from now they may catch me for not paying capital gains tax on some small transaction where I paid with Bitcoin, which technically means I sold Bitcoin and was supposed to report it and pay tax.

I don't want that.

One option is to use an app like Strike and pay in Bitcoin, via lighting, using the cash balance in Strike, i.e. USD, etc.

This technically means that you buy Bitcoin for dollars and immediately send this Bitcoin to someone. So there is no capital gain.

At least my understanding, that is. Could be wrong.

nostr:nprofile1qqsrc23txhhfq2yt9m32s7h90864j2cg62hvq4tpkrz8cvhpg5z39vglkz8w2 just released an open-source Bitcoin wallet to their 100 million users. And they’re on #nostr ! Based.

Anyone tried it yet? What do you think of it?

GM.

I guess it's a wallet, like many others.

The unique feature it has, you can send Bitcoin via email, among Proton users.

Before putting serious money in it, I would wait and see if there are any bugs and wait until someone had actually rebuilt it from source and confirmed it's the same binary.