How did they get the actual burger from 1980 into the picture.

Crypto is doomed and always has been…

All crypto suffers from the same risk and will ultimately reach the same end as #ETH is coming to.

The reason 90% of the "investors" buying any particular “crypto token” are there in the first place, is because they were excited about the “cool new hyped tech that will launch to the moon!” It’s only interesting to the majority of them because it’s illiquid and could rocket up quickly, and because it’s got a fresh new narrative that makes great marketing. Meaning after their token is already somewhat established, they all just look for its replacement. They are in love with the commercial for it, while the long term reality is boring, so they just move on to the next great looking commercial.

Only the new crypto with “better tech” can fulfill a narrative of being "new" and the promise of overnight riches. It must have low enough liquidity to jump 300% in a few days. In fact most only find their "new token" because they looked at a bunch of charts, saw a ton of green candles, and then went to read their website and join their discord. As soon as their current token can no longer provide that energy and hype, the overwhelming majority lose interest and move to the next one.

This is why there are MILLIONS of these things.

We will see this chart over and over and over again, but it will increasingly be on shorter and shorter time frames as the infrastructure matures and slowly Bitcoin eats any and every random "utility" that crypto bros are certain needs its own blockchain and consensus system -- for no good reason (which is a very small set of uses anyway).

Consider, what on earth can ETH not do in a world where almost every claim I’ve seen of “utility” that has any real use is about creating tokens and trading them in token swapping markets? Did ETH lose the ability to do those things, or has it just become old news?

The reality is that $ETH is literally the poster child for the entire crypto narrative... and it’s failing. The fall of ETH isn’t a signal that there is "better crypto," it’s the signal that the entire crypto narrative is nonsense.

The crypto ecosystem made one grave error due to ignorance of the role that money plays. Being a trustworthy, incorruptible set of rules for the definition and ownership of the money itself is the most foundational and, by orders of magnitude, the most valuable utility. Every last one of the 10s of millions of tokens they printed cannot even slightly compete with the assurances and consistency that Bitcoin provides. And because of that, they will all suffer the same fate together.

But that’s just my 2 sats.

the 10k to 70k consolidation was really long imho

I AM A MEGA BULL RIGHT NOW

How about you ?

nostr:nprofile1qyjhwumn8ghj7cn40faxymm594ex2mrp0yhxyatvd35hx6rzda6kuare9e3k7mgprfmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuum4v3hkxctjd3hhxtnrdaksqgxfax7upvpuyx7nx7sjmn6mgc75nld0azz25y4mj5xpst57fklfhqy6fmt5 9210

That’s our “it worked” screen 👏

Possible but it’s also possible the low in the bear market is the previous high which would bring below where we are now to around $69K.

More people need to realize this.

They think they can just "move the decimal" when Bitcoin becomes expensive to use on-chain.

They need to understand that doing that is increasing the supply of Bitcoin units and is a huge fucking deal.

It would be cool if Nostr had a widget that showed the BTC price 24/7 updated constantly, always at the top...

I used to think alcohol was alcohol.

Beer...Wine. They both got me drunk.

Then I started paying attention.

To how beer left me foggy.

And how wine didn’t.

Here’s what I found 🍺🍷🧵

Wine and Beer Start From Different Foundations

Wine is made from fermented grapes.

Beer is made from fermented grains.

That difference really matters.

Grapes naturally contain compounds that survive fermentation and end up in your glass. These include polyphenols, which have been studied for their ability to reduce inflammation, support blood vessels, and protect cells from oxidative stress.

Beer starts with starch. After fermentation, most commercial beer is filtered, pasteurized, and standardized. That strips out nearly all of the byproducts that might offer anything beyond alcohol and empty calories.

Both wine and beer can include additives that aren't listed on the label. But with wines, more of the beneficial compounds tend to stay in. It is also easier to find low-intervention wines with few additives, and there is a stronger culture of traceability in wine. People care who grew the grapes, how they were grown, and where.

You can find good beer and bad wine.

But at the baseline, wine has more going for it.

Blood Sugar and the Crash

Most people chalk up how they feel after drinking to “just a hangover.”

But part of that foggy, sluggish feeling is driven by blood sugar swings.

Wine, especially dry red wine, has virtually no residual sugar. During fermentation, yeast consumes the natural grape sugars. A standard glass of dry red often contains less than 1 gram of sugar.

Beer, on the other hand, contains maltose and residual starch, both of which break down quickly into glucose. This gives it a higher glycemic load, especially when consumed without food or in large quantities. Blood sugar spikes, insulin rises, and then comes the crash.

Alcohol itself makes this worse.

It inhibits gluconeogenesis, which is your liver’s ability to produce glucose when blood sugar runs low. That makes it harder for your body to recover once blood sugar drops.

This is why beer often leaves you drained and cloudy, even after just a couple.

Wine avoids about as much of that as possible. Less sugar spike. Less crash.

Antioxidants and Inflammation

Red wine contains polyphenols like resveratrol, quercetin, and anthocyanins.

These compounds have been studied for their role in reducing inflammation and protecting blood vessels.

Beer contains some antioxidants from hops and barley, but at much lower levels.

The process of filtration and pasteurization removes most of what might help.

If you’re going to drink, wine actually gives your body something to work with.

Hormonal Effects

Beer contains hops, and hops contain a compound called 8-prenylnaringenin.

It’s a powerful phytoestrogen, meaning it acts like estrogen in the body.

In high enough quantities, it can start shifting hormone levels.

Chronic beer consumption has been linked to lower testosterone, reduced libido, and, in some cases, increased body fat in areas like the manboob.

Wine doesn’t contain estrogenic compounds like this.

Some of the polyphenols in red wine may even slow down how fast your body breaks down testosterone. One lab study found a reduction in testosterone clearance by up to 70 percent.

Beer increases estrogen.

Wine slows testosterone loss.

Transparency and Sourcing

Neither beer nor wine is required to list all ingredients or additives on the label.

That means you're often drinking blind unless you know the producer.

With wine, it's usually easier to trace the origin.

There’s a stronger culture around knowing who grew the grapes and how the wine was made.

Beer doesn’t have that same emphasis on sourcing.

It’s possible, but less common.

If you want to drink better, ask questions and buy from people who can answer them.

Not all alcohol is created equal.

Beer gives you sugar spikes, estrogenic compounds, and fewer nutrients.

Wine gives you antioxidants, lower sugar, and for guys, a possible hormonal edge.

I’m not saying wine is a health drink.

But switching from beer to wine might actually make you feel better.

I’ve noticed it myself. I rarely drink beer anymore.

Curious if anyone else has had the same experience.