Avatar
Guy Swann
b9e76546ba06456ed301d9e52bc49fa48e70a6bf2282be7a1ae72947612023dc
“The Guy who has read more about Bitcoin than anyone else you know.” Adjectives: Smart/Sexy Host of Bitcoin Audible 🎧

Shit on?

I’m not shitting on Trump, I’m pointing out the people who think that he is bad for bitcoin and will lead to a CBDC and all this mess are being ridiculous. Maybe you misunderstood what my post was trying to get across.

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 nostr:note1tz8ppxs2lr9sny53xkdfc3j0mtqtcsyg5ugexgkunrcruhc05naqnstgn9

You might just be seeing people being consumed with the election and migrating back toward X for news.

Replying to Avatar Guy Swann

Here’s the thing about the bitcoin-Trump-govt-takeover doomers…

First, Trump doesn’t care about bitcoin or crypto that much. The argument always seems to be some big conspiracy to make a CBDC and use the bitcoin rocket to expand their reach and dominate all the KYC paper bitcoin and trap everyone in it, etc etc.

But it’s only us who put bitcoin at the center of our “plans.” They are “playing with it” because it’s this tiny side project that has been making money. Thats it. Trump is interested because there are voters he can appeal to. There is SO much honesty in the “and whatever else you are playing with” comment. He doesn’t care about any of this, and neither do the overwhelming majority of them.

It’s a bunch of opportunists that see growing numbers and so they buy an exchange, they try to dominate this and that market, etc. it’s nothing new.

Look at the stupid shitcoins they keep issuing. You think these are brilliantly laid plans? They could barely sell anything of their latest scam.

And of course when considering the exploiters of the old system, they will have more capital to dominate the new, but this doesn’t change in any way the fundamental incentive shift that occurs within the Bitcoin model.

Fiat has a corruption loophole, Bitcoin plugs that loophole.

Quit declaring failure before things even get off the ground. And quit framing Bitcoin’s importance through OUR lens instead of theirs. They don’t have that.

This is where “stay humble” shows up in practice, imo. We aren’t the most important thing in their world. We are winning and just need to put our head down and build solutions to TODAY’s problems, not throw our hands up in surrender or put all our concern in some elaborate, long term “probably going to happen” master plan.

Thats just my 2 sats

In other words, focus on the real that is right in front of us.

Here’s the thing about the bitcoin-Trump-govt-takeover doomers…

First, Trump doesn’t care about bitcoin or crypto that much. The argument always seems to be some big conspiracy to make a CBDC and use the bitcoin rocket to expand their reach and dominate all the KYC paper bitcoin and trap everyone in it, etc etc.

But it’s only us who put bitcoin at the center of our “plans.” They are “playing with it” because it’s this tiny side project that has been making money. Thats it. Trump is interested because there are voters he can appeal to. There is SO much honesty in the “and whatever else you are playing with” comment. He doesn’t care about any of this, and neither do the overwhelming majority of them.

It’s a bunch of opportunists that see growing numbers and so they buy an exchange, they try to dominate this and that market, etc. it’s nothing new.

Look at the stupid shitcoins they keep issuing. You think these are brilliantly laid plans? They could barely sell anything of their latest scam.

And of course when considering the exploiters of the old system, they will have more capital to dominate the new, but this doesn’t change in any way the fundamental incentive shift that occurs within the Bitcoin model.

Fiat has a corruption loophole, Bitcoin plugs that loophole.

Quit declaring failure before things even get off the ground. And quit framing Bitcoin’s importance through OUR lens instead of theirs. They don’t have that.

This is where “stay humble” shows up in practice, imo. We aren’t the most important thing in their world. We are winning and just need to put our head down and build solutions to TODAY’s problems, not throw our hands up in surrender or put all our concern in some elaborate, long term “probably going to happen” master plan.

Thats just my 2 sats

I think we are talking about different time frames. We are definitely starting into the aggressive bull territory. I didn’t say we were in a bubble.

Relax and enjoy it. We are entering the absurdly volatile times and they don’t last very long, and they get reeeally nuts if I learned anything from the last 4 of them.

This one will be wild, no doubt. You should be a little scared, but it’s also fun. It’s like we’re getting to the top of the roller coaster climb and the *real* ride is about the start. Both excitement and fear are perfectly rational… buckle up 😂

Replying to Avatar Ben Eng

nostr:nprofile1qqstnem9g6aqv3tw6vqaneftcj06frns56lj9q470gdww228vysz8hqpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqg6waehxw309ahx7um5wghx7unpdenk2urfd3kzuer9wcq3wamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwvd6hyun9de6zuenedyvu6425 Maybe good idea to purchase a cheap GoPro-like device that you can covertly record the activity at the hotel room entry, while you are not present. Then, you never need to rely solely on hotel security cams.

Exactly

Classic one right here 👇🏻 nostr:note13x6d4328xkqzn3p2x02wqr8tvek37zkw8u848xt9hnrzx5j53ras7tkqpd

?cid=9b38fe91zuwpvyw2l7wt0uvbelv6oi70bk4c1jgfixf8jy2d&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g nostr:note12tky80jefhzhnn2rnnlr0rv3k50wny4flxrx3az2txnuy4c60gmsuhsagl

GM

This thing is going to go to 100K before we really even kick this cycle off, imo

The issue is simply that isn’t literally

Importable for it not to have been. And trust me it wasn’t for lack of Bitcoiners trying. We did everything we could, spending an excruciating amount of time trying to explain it and tell people about it when it was worth nothing but we saw the potential it had to solve an absolutely massive problem!

Sorry if the response came off a little direct, but most of the time when people bring that up they like to scream and complain about “unfairness,” when many many more people did know about it for a very long time, they just ridiculed everyone who used it and called it stupid.

When you tell someone about it, they call you an idiot, then years later it’s worth a lot more, and they call it unfair and say you’ve received unjust return… it can often make one want to punch said person in the face. 🤣

The act of savings is a net gain for the economy. Holding bitcoin isn’t taking anything from anyone, quite the opposite, it’s putting real resources into the economy and not taking anything back out.

As far as what bitcoiner do with it, they do everything one would do with money. Because it’s just better money. I live on a bitcoin standard. I get paid in it, I pay people in it, I save it, I spend it. It’s money.

They do not even slightly. Printing fist is a systemic and permanent imbalance in the game rules. Being early in bitcoin was not only hard af, and not only did almost nobody have the foresight and conviction to hold since then, but it’s no more an advantage than the person who buys Apple when it’s still a massive risk and just an idea. There’s nothing remotely unfair about it and it cannot be made more fair.

It’s the difference between someone who starts a board game and gets pints, before others even come to play the game, while fiat is simply that some people can issue themselves as many points as they like, whenever they like, and buy or own anything they want in the game.

If you think those two things are even remotely the same, you’ve made a very serious error in judgement, imo.

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

gm

In fiction, the point of view from how we see the story can often color how we perceive the ethics of characters. And of course, that lesson can apply in real life as well.

If you ask most people if Neo and Trinity in the Matrix are heroes or anti-heroes, for example, they’ll probably say heroes. There is nothing particularly dark or edgy about them other than kind of a general “cool” factor. They’re pretty chill and well-meaning people in their downtime, we care about their relationship, they help their friends, they have rather pure motivations, etc.

But in the Matrix, agents can teleport themselves into any unplugged person. Which means that when Neo or Trinity attack a place, they pretty much have to slaughter everyone. Leaving survivors means that agents can teleport in. Innocent guards and stuff just get wiped out by the dozens. The stakes of humanity being enslaved by the machines are so high, that the characters don’t even really debate the ethics of this; they just accept it.

Like literally the opening scene is Trinity killing police, and the audience is like “wow cool” instead of “so, is that the antagonist?” The famous lobby scene consists of Neo and Trinity wiping out tons of guards that are just doing their job of guarding a skyscraper. In the sequel, Trinity sends a motorcycle bomb into a power station, and then murders the remaining guards as they attack her. We all basically like Trinity, and yet there are platoons of widows and orphans out there from all the guards she killed. There aren’t really even any scenes of her reflecting on that, like finding it emotionally difficult in any way to do those things or feeling in any way haunted by it.

If the Matrix story was shown from like, a detective’s point of view, these characters are terrorists and would either seem like outright villains (if you don’t know their motivation) or anti-heroes if you do (ends justify the means; mass-murder is okay and not even worth feeling bad about if it saves billions).

So, how the movie *frames* things for us makes a big difference. We closely follow Neo and Trinity so much that we’re like, “of course they’re the heroes”. The same thing happens in real life with political commentators and things like that; a cultural narrative can frame something as wholly good or wholly bad when often it’s actually kind of complex.

Therefore, it’s a useful practice whether in analyzing fiction or real life, to always ask how you could invert the framing for something.

I haven’t seen Sicario, but I would suggest that the common thread needs to be the character motivation, or the motivation of both needs to be established early unless the entire intent is to shock and punish the audience’s idea of a “happy ending” in war (or whatever the theme is). And importantly I think you have to warn your audience toward the beginning that this world

Includes the horror of unexpected and disappointing truths. If we don’t frame the theme or world with that, it can be jarring in a way that’s not enjoyable, but simply angering.

It’s a fine line to walk to buck norms and not jar the audience out of the story. I’m super eager to read what you’ve got though. Boldness very often leads to encoring stuff regardless.

I’ll give one example though of normative trends that were changed that I think was underappreciated. And that’s World War Z.

It appears on the surface like a regular “end of the world” type movie, but the escalation when you really look at it is reversed.

Usually a big budget disaster movie starts with 1 bad guy, then they fight a dozen bad guys that are more powerful and have their first “limited encounter” with the big dog, and then it ends with the “beam of light into the sky billions of random bad guys and the hugest mega boss man” fight.

WWZ actually reversed this:

• Act 1 has the literal “global zombie hordes” and huge scale attack.

• Act 2 brings it a little more local and it’s about a single city and then a single base and operation.

• Act 3 is in a building with just a few dozen zombies with a potential resolution in the middle of them.

• Then the climax is literally the main character and a single zombie.

But at each point the stakes are raised for the survival of mankind. And the final, single zombie is the ultimate test to the theory the protagonist develops during his investigation.

As someone who loves film/story and have considered myself a filmmaker, I had a particular appreciation for that movie for how they raised the stakes and intensity specifically by scaling DOWN the fight, but changing what each conflict meant. I think it was all the more powerful because of it.

The constant need for big budget films and most fantasy-adventure narratives to scale up every battle, I think is a crutch that actually weakens its effect more often than not.

lol except that it isn’t and purely depends on perspective. One side would say it’s the corrupt billionaires because they are the ones corrupting the govt. the other side would say that the problem with the govt is that it is ALWAYS corrupted, so having it big and powerful is just creating incentives to *create* corrupt billionaires.

In the market people actually have to appeal to voluntary customers. In govt they get stolen funds and contracts from the money printers.

In other words they cannot be separated from each other. It’s a virtuous (or malicious?) feedback loop.

I just spent 20 minutes with my 2 year old boy, pushing a plastic dump truck back and forth across the floor, and he was having an amount of fun that should borderline be illegal. 🤣🤣

That was all, just pushing a dump truck. After 20 minutes he got up and ran off. I thought he was done… returned 30 seconds later with his trash truck too 🤣

I also didn’t say that “a bitcoin standard would humble any company trying to do something at scale.”

That is not the statement when one says “fiat unnaturally benefits companies who grow off of constantly devaluing debts.”

It doesn’t mean scale isn’t naturally more economical. It is in most cases to a certain size and with agility being the opposing pressure. But fiat **subsidizes** bigness and causes bloat and waste across the board.

I’m not just saying that “everything will be small and big isn’t possible,” I’m saying the explicitly those things that aren’t sustainable but survive because they are huge and get subsidized debt and fake prices, THOSE corporations can’t sustain themselves. There is no way to know exactly which ones they are either, it’s just an educated guess. There is no control in this experiment and can’t be.

It spikes real bad for short periods every so often. Not out of the question but I don’t specifically remember it.

Happy Diffie-Hellman Day!

On November 1st, 1976, a paper was released to the world titled "New Directions in Cryptography" by Whitfield Diffie & Martin E. Hellman. Marking the first practical protocol for safely exchanging cryptographic keys over a public channel. Initially conceptualized by Ralph Merkle, and then actualized in the Diffie-Hellman key exchange.

Happy Halloween 🎃 👻

#Bitcoin

I don't know of a good way except to call them out publicly and label them what they are.

Also important to build strong communities that refuse to accept that shit and then outlast the fools who get swindled by them.

There is no short term solution that doesn't feel like hacking at the branches, imo. But long term I think consistency of message, calling them out, and showing and reminding everyone of the outcome over and over is the only decent option on the table.

Ah, but what if you regularly GM in the afternoon to throw them off? nostr:note1vtu2la46tk029fq7m64rla5r60mltgulmwcsdnd0acgvl2mtyu3sm07s88

I get so excited about taking a video just for my wife to show Rad of the dumbest little things that I just know he is going to think is SO cool. 🤣 nostr:note1zrszxhyvzgfcwk7nfu9cnwtscuu0apv0avnsggh52lw4dw58frtqp3w0m2

How is it that after all this time people still dont understand that owning #Bitcoin doesn’t mean control over the network?

It will take time to unlearn the fiat frame. Thinking that only *certain* people should own #Bitcoin or it’s in trouble is the opposite of why it exists.

#Bitcoin privacy with a hell of a panel… https://v.nostr.build/eCghasSGYrFDczDh.mp4

I’ll investigate again when I get back, sessions was saying he was getting the same thing until Albyhub, but it’s connecting with the same tool. Seems like it’s likely something weird with whatever service that’s running it rather than LND connect specifically.

Finally got my Coinkite shirt 😆🫡

Replying to Avatar dshf

Yeah nostr:nprofile1qqsyv47lazt9h6ycp2fsw270khje5egjgsrdkrupjg27u796g7f5k0s8jq7y6 hub is pretty much the UX that is needed for Regular Joe even if he want’s to become Uncle Jim.

👌

Eh not regular joe, but close. I would say this is the UI for the prosumer computer guy. I can’t still see a lot of areas where someone will feel confused or overwhelmed. It’s hard AF to make the complexity of all of these tools intuitive and simple. But they’ve made an incredible step in the right direction and showed how good it can be if designed right.

The hardest thing about being successful isn't obtaining wealth, it's keeping it.

— something i heard once that stuck with me