Thinking "I should restructure the whole codebase..."
Are you saying that nonsensical words will make sense with more words? You might be onto something there 🫂
An encouraging write-up, cheers 🍻 I would add that even as a dev it's not necessarily realistic to expect being able to start shipping code straight away in a new FOSS project. Time in the project > timing the project. This doesn't make any sense but it doesn't matter. Go get it pleb, consistency is key ✌️ All frustrations will fade away in time.
Are you ready for the future?
https://video.nostr.build/233808b107ffd96e681f097bd1300f247599c21cb2d834a20b3fa0c4b9960745.mp4
So how do you opt-out? There's "a guide to remove yourself from being searchable in the description" somewhere. I'm curious what they're saying in there.
Are you ready for the future?
https://video.nostr.build/233808b107ffd96e681f097bd1300f247599c21cb2d834a20b3fa0c4b9960745.mp4
The future is amazing. Build a surveillance tool and monetize opting out.
Amazing. Friends' AI twins can talk to friends' AI twins.
It would be pretty funny if X started showing Nostr notes alongside tweets to get more free (as in gratis) content on the platform.
Would it be net positive or net negative for Nostr?
On the surface X might appear more appealing now, especially to the users who have been using both in parallel. So, now Reddit does the same thing. All major platforms follow suit. More free content for all the big platforms.
Now the X users who realise the benefits of Nostr start asking questions like "if we can all see the same notes, why am I not seeing Reddit posts on X?" The conversation inevitably goes to "Pure Nostr is the only way to truly interoperate between apps".
The barriers to entry are 10x lower on Nostr compared to big social media platforms. With the Nostr UX rivaling big social media apps it's not a huge leap to leave the legacy social media once and for all when problems such as account restrictions happen. We've already seen major exoduses (exodi?) to Nostr before.
I think there will be a time when legacy social media platforms have majorly more frictions than Nostr. Just enough to make the change appealing.
The bull is a fickle friend. Especially the bull that was promised.
Your bones are the bones of Nostr, sir
What is Nostr doing to me? Why am I asking a random person about their bones on the internet.
How are the bones faring
Woah, is nostr:nprofile1qqs0zuj4s6jq9sr2ajqc69rc53d25rwpd3afcjrfm97r2qek69hcuscpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0qy2hwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytn00p68ytnyv4mz7qgawaehxw309aex2mrp0yhx6at5d9h8jampd3kx2apwvdhk6tcgjgr05 the same person whose name I recognize from reading the iptables man page?
Wouldn't be surprised. That's pretty cool.
We're so orange it became the new white at some point along the way. Bitcoin is hope ✊
It feels like Nostr development is culminating into something truly beautiful. It's all white and purple pills.
Hello, friend.
Tornado Cash? Needed a banking license. Samourai Wallet? Needed a banking license. WhatsApp, Apple, X, probably all need licenses too.
Sounds retarded? Correct. That's why the SEC has proposed a rule to formalize licensing requirements for communication protocols.
In a speech at the annual U.S. Treasury Market Conference, Gensler announced to rule on proposed amendments to the Exchange Act by November, which expand the definition of the term "exchange" to mean "systems that bring together buyers and sellers of securities [...] (i.e. "communication protocols")."
Critics argue the rule may be weaponized to criminally indict software developers given the already hostile environment for crypto- and privacy devs.
If this rule passes, we are fucked beyond comprehension.
Full story:
https://www.therage.co/gensler-to-rule-on-licensing-requirements-for-communication-protocols-2/
Oi mate you need a loicence to warn devs about needing a loicence. Straight to jail.
I refuse to watch a single ad on any platform ever. Fuck ads.

