Lmao its really 1, 2, 3, red
Why would you do that to yourself?
My dog doesn't believe I have treats unless he can see them.
Call that woof of reserves
My ai lead-gen web scraper is working nicely.
Minor tweaks like context limiting (currently naive tag-based depth) and a better way to avoid off-site links
Tornado Cash? Needed a banking license. Samourai Wallet? Needed a banking license. WhatsApp, Apple, X, probably all need licenses too.
Sounds retarded? Correct. That's why the SEC has proposed a rule to formalize licensing requirements for communication protocols.
In a speech at the annual U.S. Treasury Market Conference, Gensler announced to rule on proposed amendments to the Exchange Act by November, which expand the definition of the term "exchange" to mean "systems that bring together buyers and sellers of securities [...] (i.e. "communication protocols")."
Critics argue the rule may be weaponized to criminally indict software developers given the already hostile environment for crypto- and privacy devs.
If this rule passes, we are fucked beyond comprehension.
Full story:
https://www.therage.co/gensler-to-rule-on-licensing-requirements-for-communication-protocols-2/
I'm going to apply for my banking license just to be safe
Contradictions do not exist
When you encounter one, check your premises
I think they're trying to cause a civil war BC the appetite for foreign conflict is nonexistent
Domestic war will let them seize more power
I wonder ifzuckerberhg is on nostr
The real question is can those new meta glasses run ublock origin
Wow t 
hey made the chad cartoon into a real person
I read “Bitcoin’s Protection under the First Amendment” by Ross Stevens out loud on nostr:npub10qrssqjsydd38j8mv7h27dq0ynpns3djgu88mhr7cr2qcqrgyezspkxqj8 so you can listen while you take a nice walk. #BitcoinOutLoud nostr:note1fk68vdumuckfuuq58vaanf65m4feqhzv3ytnad5eslkxqvcx3fes0xvmk4
This is cool and all, but even if it isconstitionallhy protected, its still kind of weak.
All constitution law analysis boils down to "if the gov really wants something, its going to get it"
There's different levels of scrutiny but they basically restate the above.
At the highest, strict scrutiny, they need "a compelling government interest" + the rules/means are "narrowly tailored" to that interest.
The control over money is the life blood of the government, I don't see anything more compelling from the gov's perspective
I had a dream that btc jumped to 75k
Freud what does this mean?
BOLT-12 solves for receiver privacy, Taproot channels solve for chain analysis, and PTLCs solve for malicious routers and enable async payments for mobile devices and browser extensions. We're seeing it in use all over the world.
Is there any more Lightning FUD that hasn't been addressed by the latest developments on layers? What is Lightning missing as a fully complete alternative to shitcoins like Monero?
Source: https://x.com/cryptoquick/status/1838951397427179796
Its not piss easy
I think it was less true. Actually, no I'd say equally true
maybe its a cumulative thing, like the longer we have access to cheap delicious food the fatter we'll get
Bruh the obesity shit is BC food is cheap and delicious
5 minutes in to rebel ridge and the protag got 30k cash served under civil asset forfeiture
Homie should a just memorized 12 words smh