Avatar
randy
c0705893b70c22a35cca4721b379dc70cd8d71e8ca5b78a8c0fe6f4245c9d23c

We paid off everything around 10 years ago. No mortgage, no car payments, no installment payments. It really is life changing. In the first book of the uncle eric series by richard maybury - he asks "what is better, $5M in assets and $0 debt, or $100M in assets and $95M in debt" - the net worth is the same, but I sleep much better with the first option. Credit score does go to zero though. Thanks for the thought provoking question.

I've had this FREE ROSS sticker on the back of my work badge for months.....I will be very disappointed if this sticker remains on the back of my work badge after tomorrow. (the sticker has been a great conversation starter)

from my daughter #4. She gave me this note for my birthday - my favorite gifts are words and hugs.

For my birthday - my sister-in-law made me these custom bitcoin coasters. so thoughtful. need to get her on nostr.

123 YEARS OF LIGHT, 100 YEARS OF LIES

In Livermore, California, a single light bulb has been glowing continuously since 1901.123 years of uninterrupted brilliance. But this simple bulb reveals a dark truth: the deliberate sabotage of innovation by the Phoebus Cartel in the 1920s.

This cartel didn’t just shorten the lifespan of light bulbs to 1,000 hours, they set the stage for planned obsolescence, a system where products are intentionally designed to fail. The result? A global economy warped by false scarcity and consumer exploitation. Exactly what nostr:npub1gdu7w6l6w65qhrdeaf6eyywepwe7v7ezqtugsrxy7hl7ypjsvxksd76nak mentioned in the Fiat Standard.

HOW THE MARKET WAS RIGGED

Planned obsolescence distorts free markets by severing the natural relationship between consumer preferences and producer innovation. Instead of competing on durability or quality, manufacturers engineer products to fail, creating:

🔘 False scarcity, forcing premature replacement.

🔘 Distorted price signals, hiding true product value.

🔘 Resource misallocation, with energy and materials wasted on unnecessary replacements.

The Austrian economic perspective shows how this disrupts entrepreneurial discovery, where true innovation is replaced with profit-maximizing manipulation.

THE HIDDEN COSTS OF PLANNED OBSOLESCENCE

🔘 Consumer Debt: Endless replacement cycles disproportionately burden lower-income households.

🔘 Erosion of Trust: Consumers lose faith in the fairness of market mechanisms.

🔘 Innovation Suppression: Producers focus on maximizing profit margins, not advancing technology or durability.

The effects ripple outward: natural market forces are stifled, and the potential for true progress is dimmed.

THE WAY FORWARD

The solution isn’t more regulation, it’s a return to genuine market principles. In a free market:

🔘 Durability becomes a competitive edge, as consumers reward long-lasting products.

🔘 Entrepreneurial discovery thrives, driving innovation in response to real demand.

🔘 Trust is restored, as producers align with consumer needs, not artificially imposed cycles.

The Livermore bulb is more than a relic it’s a symbol of what markets can achieve when driven by freedom and ingenuity. Let’s reject the #Fiat cartel mindset and reignite a system where innovation and durability shine brighter than ever.

#Nostr

I knew this happened- thanks for sharing the story

Replying to Avatar HODL

Thought experiment.

Option # 1

Let’s say you have 10 bitcoin and we hit 2 million in the next few years.

You’re tempted so you sell it for 20 million dollars.

After taxes you’re be left with 16MM.

Which you use to comfortably generate 1.2MM a year in the tradfi markets.

So you take the money and retire.

Bitcoin crashes 60% back to 800k.

For a few years you feel like a genius. You enjoy your new rich person lifestyle.

You even buy back a few bitcoin. 2 to be exact. 20% of what you used to have.

Then bitcoin rises over the next decade to be worth 50 million per coin.

You’re worth 120 million now. And you decide to sell a little over half a coin and upgrade your lifestyle again to be able to generate an additional 2 million a year.

You’re now on paper worth 120 million, you generate 3.2 million a year (266k a month) and you’ve been largely stress free for the last decade.

Your kids will inherit roughly 1.62 bitcoin from you upon your death.

You have some level of regret about not hodling through, but you’ve been largely stress free and the mental health benefit was worth it in your mind.

Vs.

Option # 2

You have the same 10 bitcoin but you Hodl them.

Your stress levels are persistently higher.

You also decide to retire when Bitcoin hits 2 mil, but you decide to do so in bitcoin terms.

Your plan is to sell a little bitcoin as needed in order to fund your lifestyle.

This is roughly 1-3 million sats a month. Depending on bitcoin price.

Over the course of 10 years you end up selling or spending 2.4 bitcoin and are still left worth 7.6btc when bitcoin reaches 50 million.

Your net worth is 380 million.

You’ve reduced your lifestyle in bitcoin terms down to a million sats a month. (500k) or 6 million per year. You’re 46, Assuming you live until you’re 90 you will pass down 2.32 bitcoin to your kids.

You have no regrets about the way you played it, but your stress was consistently higher and there were a few scary months along the way.

Which option do you choose?

1 or 2?

2