And it’s those moments that make all the late nights and temper tantrums worth it.
Only time I’d disagree is if the thought of solving the hard problem causes you to not even start.
Agreed. The user should be sovereign. It would be convenient to opt-in to certain block lists, though. I would always retain the option to override parts or all of the list, of course.
Nation states don’t seem to be leaders in tech. They’ll go where the people are.
Agreed. I despise shitcoins. But I oppose regulation of any kind. nostr:note1jfec3hrgr53d0mfkusetdfap8ramwre3kt32wc9et8f0zcgg8uxsh05se8
I’m not a lawyer. I wonder if Apple considering these Zaps as payments (money) is in conflict with the fact that the US does not recognize Bitcoin as money.
Apple’s enforcement of this policy means that they believe Bitcoin to be money. nostr:note15kzxy4cj6jfg0psunefrwmrjymlaces5wd2ed3q2ncpqctr6yspqnslv7a
This seems pretty smart. Then each event could have content policies that are appropriate for their audience.
Bitcoin didn’t ask permission.
The true value of #Bitcoin lies in its potential to revolutionize the way we transact and store value. Stay focused on the big picture and HODL for the long-term gains! 🚀
Not at all
I tend to agree. He is quite good at valuing companies. He doesn’t seem to be very knowledgeable about valuing anything else. And valuing something like #Bitcoin is simply not something that the entire human race is very knowledgeable about valuing yet. That plus the status quo has benefited him immensely. All this means that his opinion is probably not going to be very insightful or enlightening.
Out of curiosity, I’ve been back testing a 50/50 BTC/Gold portfolio. I call it the “Hard Money” portfolio. Gold definitely cuts down on the volatility. It, of course, cuts the returns basically in half but it still makes the S&P look flat.