What if you just fucked off 🖕
Fortunately, for now there is no broad law prohibiting privacy. But several privacy seeks actions have been criminalized (such as "money laundering") while others were and will be attempted (Crypto Wars, 3rd Party Doctrine, banning E2E encryption, etc).
Continua a sonhar
nostr:note1fnxyy6wg7twwnf65n6k44sm3p9x0eejulp32st2m86yac5hvajnqmppqfdWhy 'pullback'? Which news did I miss?
What is or not a crime is decided by the law. So semantically, you are wrong. It is a crime.
Even if the money came from a crime you committed, laundering that money is not the unethical part.
Should a bank robber also be charged with the crime of conceleaing his face on top of the original crime of robbing the bank? It's pretty ridiculous if you ask me
That's not the page I was referring to. All I want is for people to recognize that was is illegal is not necessarily unethical.
We only need to be on the same page about semantics, otherwise we can't even have meaningful discussion.
Money laundering is just an act of seeking financial privacy. Not all privacy enabled acts have been outlawed (yet) all though they are trying to ban e2e encryption.
Stop saying that privacy is not a crime, it is. Money laundering is an actual crime.
Crime != unethical
Law != ethics
Let's all get on the same page.
Unpopular opinion, but here it goes: UX is the most important problem we need to solve for Bitcoin Privacy.
We can hate on KYC exchanges all we want, but they've got UX nailed down. We cannot expect privacy to become the norm when I have to take an hour out of my day to make a P2P trade.
Now that CASPs will start delisting privacy assets like Monero and blocking coinjoined btc with the EU's new AMLR, we're being stripped of using regulated exchanges even semi-privately. This makes P2P exchanges like BISQ Network even more important, but its of no use to regular users when you need an introductory course in computer science before understanding what's going on in the app.
Privacy will only become the norm when we make it usable for everybody. **If you're a UX designer, copywriter, or in any other way have expertise in UX design, please consider contributing BISQ:** https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq
ℹ️ If you're not a developer, contributing to GitHub projects can be scary. It really doesn't have to be. I can't tell my asshole from a python script either, and if I can do it, you can too.
Here's how to get started:
If you find a UX issue in the BISQ app that could be improved, start by opening an issue in the BISQ github repository. Give it a clear title describing the problem you want to solve.
Add screenshots or videos to your issue showing what the problem is. If you can, add a proposal for a potential solution. Bonus points if you can add wireframes, layouts or clickdummy documentation. For reference, see npub1zqsu3ys4fragn2a5e3lgv69r4rwwhts2fserll402uzr3qeddxfsffcqrs 's work on eNuts: https://github.com/cashubtc/eNuts/issues/341 (I don't know how to tag people here but you get the idea).
In open source projects, questions are your friends. I've spent countless hours asking every dev i know absolutely insufferable questions, and I still dont know how the fuck to get out of VIM. Everybody starts somewhere, and most people are happy to help.
If you already know how to use git or github and can code a little, ask where you could find the corresponding code for your problem in your issue and offer to do a PR. If you can't, ask what assets would be needed to implement your proposal. Remember that people are nice and generally happy about new contributors, even if you're a beginner.
If you have any questions on contributing to open source projects as a non-coder, feel free to reach out anytime. My DMs are open (I think).
Not taking a selfie with my ID and having my PII breached and sold in the darkweb is the best UX.
I don't think deciding in absolutes is the way to go. Each family is uniquely different to the one before and you should not apply the same ruling for every case.
In case of separation, ideally both ex-partners should decide on their own how to rearrange their lifes. If they can't come to an amicable agreement, a neutral 3rd party needs to solve the litigation with that specific case in mind, not followjng a genericalistic rulebook.
Most git servers expose the file tree through their webserver. Can't we hack around and use this as a best effort to verify?
Why not show both as different things (in case they are different)? A git commit can also have an author and a committer
the intention for allow multiple clone urls was so that the data related to the same master branch tip could be accessed from multiple locations for censorship resistance reasons.
It didn't occur to me that it would be used to point to repositories with different tips.
nostr:npub16r0tl8a39hhcrapa03559xahsjqj4s0y6t2n5gpdk64v06jtgekqdkz5pl has been working on a `ngit clone` proposal, which would be effected by this.
would the first item in `clone` be the default remote?
Yes, thats how I implemented it. I then add the other clone urls as alternative remotes names ngit0, ngit1, etc