Avatar
sommerfeld
d0debf9fb12def81f43d7c69429bb784812ac1e4d2d53a202db6aac7ea4b466c
Sovereignty, freedom, privacy, self-hosting and software dev 8BETLojm7zCfGV8DKKiRWLAXrFGbkZxDAgzpGmkrDvafTB18QFUg9cQ1KKDtcECrekV14yZDdGEEQbGy8ShXq1pDBVAh2Hw

Disregard the comments saying "it's ok better luck next time", those people are weak and so are you. Stop being a pussy and chew the fucking gum or cut off a finger

I would drop "parametrized", just "Replaceable Event", it's cleaner πŸ˜‰πŸ˜…. All replaceable events should be parametrizable, current non-parametrizable events could just be viewed as parametrized with a null parameter.

When you are on vacation but your children make sure you still wake up at 6am

There's 2 types of people who make this argument about KYC and covenants: the poor misled retarded ones and theones that know and understand exactly what you just explain yet they insist on pushing this FUD over and over again.

"Hey look I'm paying this centralized provider for a json entry" or "hey look I bought this domain"

It's a retarded status symbol. No one pays attention to them, notices them or memorizes and uses them as identifier aliases. Meanwhile newbies are being convinced they really need one.

Whatever helps you sleep at night πŸ«‚

Even if possible, no one would do it out of altruism. The most likely scenario would be someone doing it to attack

Everyone acting like a bunch of puritans. Truth is 99% would get bought for much less.

If you want purity, be a monk.

Everyone's job is less than 5 degrees of separation from Lockheed Martin. There's no such thing as purely ethical job.

Bullish on second hand fossils. They might sell by more than retail now

I have one of those myself! Very well maintained and a single lone star on github, and it's not mine, it's from some rando. I do it all for him β€οΈπŸ˜‚

Difficulty going down makes the network easier to attack. Nothing is without consequences. We cannot go back to 2013 pre-asic difficulties and survive.

The cost to attack +potential reward of a double spend is not directly related to network value. While it's still more profitable to mine than to attack, mining will prevail.

If price doubles and hashrate stays the same, mining profitability doubles, the cost to attack stays the same.