#aksNostr
Are there any editors on nostr? Like writing kid books editor for a bitcoin book?
The server client paradigm is shit and the web sucks.
Is it too late to say GM. I forgot. I’m sorry.
Wrong thread, I think.
Good call that fixed it! The original invite link I had been using was for a private beta and is different from the link on their website. This time I used the public beta link on their website and it worked. FYI nostr:npub16c0nh3dnadzqpm76uctf5hqhe2lny344zsmpm6feee9p5rdxaa9q586nvr and nostr:npub1xy54p83r6wnpyhs52xjeztd7qyyeu9ghymz8v66yu8kt3jzx75rqhf3urc . 💜🤙
Glad to hear it.
Bad take. They’re not bank backed, they’re bitcoin VC backed. Which is why I expect better out of them.
Why did nostr:npub12vkcxr0luzwp8e673v29eqjhrr7p9vqq8asav85swaepclllj09sylpugg remove these users from using their TestFlight app? nostr:note1tku9t66pfxjmfqhxrjg33hluy0049m6v3ytpygzktfayqyycd55sux7h7y
More censorship by nostr:npub12vkcxr0luzwp8e673v29eqjhrr7p9vqq8asav85swaepclllj09sylpugg team?!?! 
No idea. But I lost a lot of respect for nostr:npub12vkcxr0luzwp8e673v29eqjhrr7p9vqq8asav85swaepclllj09sylpugg for the victim mentality of it all. They did make a quick turn on the dev side but the victim virtue signaling is very childish. I’ll probably uninstall again so I can support other clients.
Calling it an “attack” implies harm. Putting quotes around “shadowban” implies it wasn’t actually a shadowban. I’m curious how nostr:npub16c0nh3dnadzqpm76uctf5hqhe2lny344zsmpm6feee9p5rdxaa9q586nvr defines an attack? Wouldn’t an attack imply malice? Or indicate harm done? How does the nostr:npub12vkcxr0luzwp8e673v29eqjhrr7p9vqq8asav85swaepclllj09sylpugg team define “shadowban”? I would think disallowing access to something without explicitly giving reasons is pretty shadowy?
But I’m just a dude on the internet so 🤷♂️ nostr:note13rgfufl5qggvfax3fm82ehjkyyg4aralc6mysu68555fv9j2rrgq7lpl45