Looks like nostr:npub1l2vyh47mk2p0qlsku7hg0vn29faehy9hy34ygaclpn66ukqp3afqutajft got your profile data back for you. Fresh and clean!
No, it wasn't Pablo, I used:
But if nostr:npub1l2vyh47mk2p0qlsku7hg0vn29faehy9hy34ygaclpn66ukqp3afqutajft can restore my follows for me then he will still be cool in my book 😄
I have only heard of it being voluntary, but I guess it depends on which State it is...
🤔 I wonder if that's because I no longer write to those two relays... Do you use any others?
Yeah, I did that, but still follow the same low number of people (I used to follow 1000+)
Is this like modern Israel trying to do now what ancient Israel was told to do in biblical times: exterminate the Canaanites?
The Old Covenant is complete, the New has come! The Messiah has come and He commands us to love our neighbors, even if they're enemies.
My profile is restored, thanks to nostr:npub15qydau2hjma6ngxkl2cyar74wzyjshvl65za5k5rl69264ar2exs5cyejr's Nostr Profile Manager, https://metadata-contacts-relays.pages.dev/ 😁
Apparently that didn't restore my follows, though...
It's probably so the police can identify a stolen bike and track down the owner.
My profile is restored, thanks to nostr:npub15qydau2hjma6ngxkl2cyar74wzyjshvl65za5k5rl69264ar2exs5cyejr's Nostr Profile Manager, https://metadata-contacts-relays.pages.dev/ 😁
Yeah, Biden couldn't do an interview like this, and it would be pointless anyway. You'd have to talk to the real puppet-masters behind the scenes, possibly Victoria Nuland or Susan Rice (or even other Deep State denizens buried more deeply in The Swamp) to get the U.S.-NATO rationale.
Perhaps along the national self-determination line of argument, one could argue that #Ukraine has the right to join NATO if it wants to. Russia saying that it can't is like the U.S. trying to dictate what nations can and can't have nukes. But I do understand Russia not wanting missiles pointed at it right on her border, just like the U.S. objected to Soviet missiles stationed in Cuba during the Cold War. Perhaps if the Ukraine were to join NATO they should agree not to do this.
But the real rationale for US-NATO actions in this conflict probably has to do with stirring up trouble for #Russia in order to keep the Military-Industrial-Complex gravy-train alive, as well as hiding the money-laundering and bioweapons development that the Deep State had going on there...
Is his first name actually Chad, or are you just calling him a Chad? 😄
Missing from this picture is George W. Bush and Barry Sotoro (aka Barack Obama), possibly because they were still boys...
what kind of note is it? looks like a type 1 note to me
{"content":"Testing Satcom... Where does this note show up? On my timeline? In the Global feed?\n\nhttps://w3.do/5-79aRSn","created_at":1707584814,"id":"f5d9722e9ecd1ed428e5f26dc19227c289d218281c1b0b9212dd5fda42ac45b3","kind":1,"pubkey":"dace63b00c42e6e017d00dd190a9328386002ff597b841eb5ef91de4f1ce8491","sig":"b48cf4dd64d375d9825342298e7d5a46bc829be3a0b4b6e06dfb717e0798b0f48247258388406355c3cb6ef55e17aae8ad8e0c41400ea8213db89ae3907f0463","tags":[["r","https://offline.cash/?","page"],["r","offline.cash","host"]]}
yes, kind 1
I see it on my timeline but I didn't see it on the Global feed, but maybe it was there... nostr:npub1alpha9l6f7kk08jxfdaxrpqqnd7vwcz6e6cvtattgexjhxr2vrcqk86dsn
Good points. I heard on a podcast the other day that when and if things do fall apart, we're not just going to sit down and deliberate and come up with the next great system of government. What will get adopted is something that is already in place and working somewhere, on a smaller scale. So we need to already be on it...
Oh cool, that would help! (I don't blame you, though; I see it as a Nostr thing, one of the tradeoffs right now 😄)
Nope, nostrgram.co is no longer functional (which is too bad, it had a useful backup tool built in).
Perhaps the domain is available?
Testing Satcom... Where does this note show up? On my timeline? In the Global feed?
Actually, we don't need the State.
We can have governance, without Government.
One is voluntary, the other is not.
One relies on cooperation and persuasion, the other on compulsion and violence.
If this sounds utopian, the idea of limited government is utopian, and yet we gave it a go in America for nearly two and a half centuries. Why don't we try to go even farther in our experiments in liberty? One might argue that we shouldn't, for fear of ending up with something worse. After all, that's arguably what happened in America after the Revolution. I'd like to think that we have the benefit of some experience and history now with "representative" government that the Founders didn't have. Is it possible that we have learned anything and can make some advancements in the pursuit of liberty?
