Avatar
Marakesh 𓅦
dace63b00c42e6e017d00dd190a9328386002ff597b841eb5ef91de4f1ce8491
Christ Follower • Truth Seeker • Freedom Lover The US #GovtIsTheProblem

Twilight Of The Blobs

Twilight Of The Blobs

https://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/twilight-of-the-blobs/

“Respect the blob, learn from the blob, love the blob.”

- Robert Kagan, Arch Blob Monster, Brookings, 2020

HG Wells concocted a marvelous trick ending to his classic tale The War of the Worlds (1897). Remember: the colossal Martian tripod “fighting machines” swarm all over the planet zapping cities with “heat rays”. . . it looks like all-is-lost . . . but finally the darn things just quit marching, stop zapping, and stand down . . . the alien protoplasms at the controls (surprise ending) turn up dead and rotting inside from the action of our tiny invisible allies: the earth’s one-celled, disease-causing bacteria, to which the Martian blob creatures have no immunity!

The Gaian overtones in that story resound today as we Earthlings devise ingenious new methods to wreck terrestrial life, including ourselves. The planet seems to have some teleological drive to save itself, a kind of immune system. Notice: in all the ongoing debates about the wonders and dangers of A-I, and Bitcoin, and suffocating surveillance, nobody ever talks about the sketchy condition of the electric grid that all these worrisome phenomena utterly rely on.

In our chatter over Peak Oil, there’s little awareness of oil production’s utter dependence on steady capital flows. In all the guff about centralized control emitted by Klaus Schwab and his World Economic Forum, there’s no mention of the centrifugal forces driving human affairs to re-localization, dis-aggregation of large states, and down-scaling of many activities. In our zeal to become Gods, we miss a lot.

Imagine: Bitcoin shoots up to a million dollars. You’re a zillionaire! Uh Oh. . . somewhere outside Zanseville, Ohio, a squirrel takes a final chaw through some old insulation on a wire coming out of a transformer. His head blows up in a blue arc flash, and in a few seconds all the electricity goes out from Chicago to Boston. It turns out that seventeen substations in ten states have blown relays, transformers, and switchgear. Some of those components were forty years old and are now manufactured twelve thousand miles away in a country that doesn’t like us anymore. The replacement parts get held up in a Chinese port. The power doesn’t come back on for weeks. Nobody who lives in the eastern USA can get to his Bitcoin wallet, which is just a virtual entity made of computer code residing in a digital “cloud,” i.e., nowhere real.

Of course, in an event that bad, a lot of other things would fail — really just about everything that comprises modern life — but for sure you could kiss your Bitcoin goodbye, perhaps forever, because by the time the juice comes back on (if it even does), nobody will ever again want to invest their wealth in digital “money” they can’t access, and Bitcoin will go back to whence it came: zero.

Likewise, the financial system we depend on is a gigantic apparatus grown extremely janky from over-elaboration and hyper-complexity — to the degree that all kinds of things denoted as having “moneyness” are simply hallucinations of the markets that trade them. How many quadrillions of dollars do “derivative” financial instruments represent on the landscape of “money” these days? Most of these things amount to little more than bets that some number — an interest rate, a currency, a revenue flow — will change either up or down. That is, they are figments.

Under Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), the evolution of figments can theoretically go on forever. Derivatives can be ever more abstracted from what they purport to represent, until they fly up the system’s cloacal vent. MMT has become popular economic dogma, but its theory remains to be substantiated. Since the formula relies on the unlimited “printing” of money by central bank proxies for governments, you might bet that something will go wrong with such a system — and it kind of looks like something is about to go wrong in the system we’ve built for regulating and distributing capital. And do we need to state what “capital” is? (Real wealth, not figments, wishes, bets, and hallucinations. . . hard things like good land, ore pockets, installed machinery, railroad tracks, and so on. . . .)

Bitcoin has gone “hockey stick” the past month, meaning on a chart the move up looks nearly vertical. Do you know why it’s going up? I’ll tell you: it’s going up . . .  because it’s going up. People and groups of people (wealth funds, banks) see the up-trend and deduce that Bitcoin is going “to the moon.” Meanwhile, they view the tea leaves of the currency scene and see a lot of brown, crumbly debris where there used to be “capital.” The money itself is losing its “moneyness” all over the place. The most vulnerable module of the system now is the bond market.

The bond market is based on the idea that borrowed money will be reliably paid back, the key word there being reliably. One crucial condition, though, is that money has to stay “money.” People have to regard it as possessing value. And now all kinds of money is visibly losing value. Approaching the $35-trillion mark in our national debt, there is reason to doubt that the USA can plausibly pay off its debt, or even service it anymore — that is, keep paying interest on it. The more money we “print” under MMT, the more value the money loses. The interest rate on the borrowed money has to go up to compensate for that loss of value, and all of a sudden you’re borrowing a shit-ton of money to pay the interest on the money you owe, the gross volume of which is only increasing . . . moving rapidly toward critical. . . . Uh-oh.

Many sentient beings viewing the scene warn us that the bond market is liable to blow, and with it most of the other modules in the current MMT-driven system. That will be the magic moment when a big theory gets disproven rather vividly and injuriously. The price of everything will vaporize in a mushroom cloud of malinvestment and when the dust settles — which might take a long time — everything will be priced differently, including many things at zero.

This is the kind of world we’re in now, and all this is why I don’t worry quite so much about the machinations of the various blobs that have self-assembled to defend their particular special interests while doing harm to many of us: the military-industrial blob, the censorship blob, the fake news blob, the intel blob, the corporate monopoly blob, the medical blob, the central banking blob.

?itok=Pg_xPhM6

The systems we depend on to make all things blobish function are looking pretty ill, like they’re not going be working a whole lot longer.

The result will be a beneficial time-out from blobbery. I’ll venture to predict that it will be a rather long time-out. A lot of the scary things going on around us, tyrannizing us, stripping our assets and our freedom, will not find their footing easily in the aftermath, perhaps never again. We’ll have decades, maybe centuries, to think about the hubris that brought all of that on, and in the meantime, we’ll have to live the earthly life as the earth allows and abide with it. And maybe dote on some new dreams of what a perfect world would look like.

*  *  *

Support his blog by visiting https://www.patreon.com/JamesHowardKunstler

https://cms.zerohedge.com/users/tyler-durden

Mon, 03/11/2024 - 13:00

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/twilight-blobs

> Imagine: Bitcoin shoots up to a million dollars. You’re a zillionaire! Uh Oh. . . somewhere outside Zanseville, Ohio, a squirrel takes a final chaw through some old insulation on a wire coming out of a transformer. His head blows up in a blue arc flash, and in a few seconds all the electricity goes out from Chicago to Boston. It turns out that seventeen substations in ten states have blown relays, transformers, and switchgear. Some of those components were forty years old and are now manufactured twelve thousand miles away in a country that doesn’t like us anymore. The replacement parts get held up in a Chinese port. The power doesn’t come back on for weeks. Nobody who lives in the eastern USA can get to his Bitcoin wallet, which is just a virtual entity made of computer code residing in a digital “cloud,” i.e., nowhere real.

> Of course, in an event that bad, a lot of other things would fail — really just about everything that comprises modern life — but for sure you could kiss your Bitcoin goodbye, perhaps forever, because by the time the juice comes back on (if it even does), nobody will ever again want to invest their wealth in digital “money” they can’t access, and Bitcoin will go back to whence it came: zero.

nostr:nevent1qqs8h4xwftzglhpdnrhnwnzq72prvpw00ypulp905rd2lfa8wt7rj7cpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgq3qax4nz2wp2zw2xprx4ux0x7zsdj60272tqvqt76ru5ctmt8pdpdksxpqqqqqqzg7lxc6

If human labor gets replaced, governments may start handing out universal basic income, which they trialed during COVID when governments forced people to not go to work, but it will come with strings attached (that is, you'll be something of a slave), and of course it will be taxed...

What are you smoking, my friend? 😄

j/k!

I personally take statement quoted by Jude from Enoch as true, but I don't think that necessarily means he automatically endorsed everything that was written in that book.

> Jude 14–15 (CSB): “Look! The Lord comes with tens of thousands of his holy ones to execute judgment on all and to convict all the ungodly concerning all the ungodly acts that they have done in an ungodly way, and concerning all the harsh things ungodly sinners have said against him.”

Thanks for entering the discussion, Brother!🙏🏻😁 I appreciate your participation.

Since you have appealed to Jesus' observation here about angels, I have a few questions for you about them.🤔❓

Do you know that angel is a Greek word, not English? Please read this:

https://peakd.com/life/@creatr/the-curmudgeon-s-bible-the-word-angel

Before reading, did you know there were *at least* three kinds?

Where did the artistic notion of "genderless angels" come from; Scripture, or human tradition?

If you think the idea is scriptural, can you cite the Scriptures it comes from? And if angels are *only* men, does that mean Christians all become men in heaven?

Genesis six seems to indicate that the heavenly beings called "Sons of God" are quite capable of copulating with humans and bringing forth progeny...

Why would you consider gender to be the particular angel characteristic Jesus was alluding to, and not rather, for example, immortality, or four faces, or wings? All of which Scripture actually does describe certain celestial beings as having?

You've said "Jesus' answer seems to imply that she wouldn't be married to any," but wouldn't it be just as likely to imply that theSadducee's "only one husband in the resurrection" assumption was faulty?

In Scripture, are men with multiple wives ever called fornicators or adulterers within the boundary of their marriages?

I'm just pointing out that most of the ideas you mention seem to be more traditional than biblical or cultural.

By the way, why do people always quote 1 Corinthians 2:9 without the very next verse? Oh, maybe because verse 10 says:

"...these are the things God has revealed to us by his Spirit."🤣

Seriously, I very much appreciate your reading my story, and hope you might find the opportunity to read and comment on the rest of the series.🙏🏻😁🫂💜😆

Hi Brother, I did read your article about the different kinds of "angels" and it's good, thanks for sharing! I'm glad it didn't consist of you saying that cherubim and seraphim are also angels...

The notion of "genderless angels", artistic or otherwise likely comes from the fact that

> Scripture universally refers to angels with male names (Luke 1:19, 26; Jude 9; Revelation 12:7) and with male pronouns (Daniel 9:21-22). When they appear, they are referred to as men. Compare Genesis 18:2, 16, 22 to Genesis 19:1. Also, Luke 24:4, 23 refers to two angels as men.

>

> No angels are referred to as women or with feminine names. There are no angels appearing as females in the Bible. This means that we should not understand these two women in Zechariah 5:9 to be female angels. It would be inconsistent with the rest of Scripture. By the way, it is doubtful that there are actually biological male angels." [(Source:](https://www.neverthirsty.org/bible-qa/qa-archives/question/are-the-two-women-in-zechariah-59-angels/)

I don't think Christians will all become men in the resurrection (despite what the Gospel of Thomas says 🙄); we will likely retain some recognizable correspondence with our previously mortal body, although it may strangely not appear quite the same, judging by the way Jesus was received after His resurrection. And of course Jesus' resurrected body could do things like appear and disappear. My point is our resurrected bodies will be somewhat different, and perhaps might even lack unnecessary organs or even those that led to so much trouble in a past life 😅

As to Genesis 6, I'm more inclined to the interpretation that "The sons of God could be translated 'the sons of the gods'. Ancient texts attest to an ideology of divine kingship; human kings were called sons of various gods." (Note on Gen. 6:1-4 from Guthrie, Donald, *The New Bible Commentary Revised.* Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1973, p. 87.) I think it refers to the despotic rulers of the time who had cities built for themselves and imitated the lifestyle and cruelty of Lamech. They began to call themselves "sons of the gods" and associated with demonic forces (compare Ezekiel 28:11-15; Daniel 10:13). Jude 6-7 speaks against the interpretation that they were angels. If these "sons of the Elohim" were angels, then humans would then have been punished by the Flood for what angels were guilty of.

I think when Jesus' was asked whose wife would the woman who had seven husbands be in the resurrection Jesus' answer was in essence "none of their wife, since there is no marriage in the resurrection." They would be unmarried, like the angels of God. I think the context rules out Jesus referring to the angels' gender or immortality or number of faces, etc.

Good point on quoting 1 Corinthians 2:10: "...these are the things God has revealed to us by His Spirit," though I don't believe the context is referring to sex in heaven as one of them 😄

Since I haven't yet read Enoch, according to Google: "The oldest part of the Book of Enoch is the Apocalypse of Weeks, which is thought to have been written around 167 BC, shortly before the Maccabean uprising. The Book of the Watchers, which contains fragments found in the Qumran caves, is thought to date back to 200–150 BC."

So that's at least several centuries after David.

Yeah, but who's still running their country?

Oh, wait...

And I have been uneasy drinking bottled water ever since I read on Nostr about the micro-plastics in them...😨

I appreciate your original thinking, nostr:npub1cxp3l03x20mkzezzr4takm8w8zuva7xwvacmcewp97z58hjt8xls3mexlq, and I once also came up with this interpretation and shared it with another young Christian who seemed to agree, but I have since come to see it differently.

In context, the Saduccees had asked Jesus about whose wife this woman who had been married to seven different brothers would be in the resurrection:

> In the resurrection, then, whose wife will she be of the seven? For they all had married her.” Jesus answered them, “You are mistaken, because you don’t know the Scriptures or the power of God. For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage but are like angels in heaven.

Matthew 22:28–30 (CSB)

Under your view, I would think Jesus would have said that all of the brothers would be married to her (assuming they all make it to the new world), am I right? Instead, Jesus' answer seems to imply that she wouldn't be married to any of the brothers because there won't be any marriage (perhaps other than that of Christ and His Bride, the Church). And if there is no marriage between the children of the resurrection, I can't imagine there would be fornication or adultery among them either!

Saying that the children of the resurrection will be like the angels of God is interesting and mysterious. I remember in the movie Dogma an angel there was portrayed as having no genitalia. I would think we humans would retain our sex and presumably our organs thereto, but I also note that the Bible always appears to portray angels as looking exclusively like men (and they also don't have wings or look like fat little babies). And they are called the "Sons of God". If there are no female angels there is probably no means or need for angels to reproduce. And they certainly wouldn't be engaged in a big homosexual orgy in heaven!

Anyway, just adding my thoughts to the discussion.

> However, as it is written:

“No eye has seen,

no ear has heard,

no mind has conceived

what God has prepared for those who love Him”

1 Corinthians 2:9 (NIV)

Good Morning, Frens, and Happy Sunday, my fellow Christians.🙏🏻😁

This is my firecracker article of the week.

https://peakd.com/story/@creatr/whispering-hope-7

You've probably been told there's no sex in heaven. Are you kidding me? Why in heaven's name would God eliminate the highest form of human intimacy that he has ever designed?🤔

Don't forget to comment below, *after* you've read the article. You might also enjoy the rest of the series.😄

#sex #fantasy #theology #Christianity #Bible #heaven

Pardon my levity, but you just reminded me of this meme 😂

Right, it's just that some gangs make themselves look more "legit" than others.