Avatar
Hurvajs Rumcajs
dbac1635509fd4bf997b5a18392983a6dc954f7c24f9daf5f2d890bb31cb2c46
Fiat disrespector. Predstavuje si ancap jako hurvinek valku. Budoucnost patri aluminiu!

Nice, I'd mess up an out of tune piano even further if I tried to tune it. All the stretching and stuff.

BTW what is the general approach to tuning the keys with more than one string? Do you go for as close tuning as possible or a gentle "chorus" for richer sound?

"Podle ministra životního prostředí Petra Hladíka Češi třídí úžasně. Nicméně stále končí velký objem toho materiálu na skládkách nebo ve spalovnách. To chce ministerstvo změnit a nejenom u PET lahví nebo u plechovek, ale u celé řady dalších materiálů. Podle Hladíka se tak má systém odpadového hospodářství změnit na oběhové hospodářství."

Potrebujeme zavest buzeracni system s velkou rezii, co vsechno strasne zkomplikuje, protoze lidi sice tridej skvele, ale my to pak vyhodime na stejnou hromadu jako by to netridili.

"Hlasim uradu pro desinformace, ze toto neni pravy duvod zavadeni tohoto opatreni."

"Aha vy ste urad vytvari oficialni desinformace, tak to pardon"

https://echo24.cz/a/HLiTc/zpravy-domov-stat-chce-zalohovani-pet-lahvi

Hmmm, zas se dozvidame o tom ze byl ucitelem tantrickyho sexu. Takze to nemuze byt seriozni kandidat.

No hlavne at si zvoli ty stejny lidi co vladli doted, ty vedi co delaj. IMF jim zas rado pujci.

https://www.seznamzpravy.cz/clanek/zahranicni-fanousci-taylor-swiftove-vedou-kampan-proti-argentinskemu-trumpovi-239665

Jo to je moc dobrej postreh. 👍

"Ste si jisti ze nejste obeti podvodu?

- pracovnici banky vam nikdy nebudou volat uprostred noci, abyste vybrali penize a nasypali je do bitcoinmatu

- ...

- ...

"

Nesmelo by toho byt moc, aby to nebyl "smallprint".

Urcite nekdo zna lepsi metodu.

That's a good point. In Spain the same thing applies to fascists/frankists... when I lived there for a while people mentioned these "old regime people" exactly in the same manner as we (in post communist country) talk about the old commies.

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

Progressives vs Conservativs is the ultimate tension.

Politically speaking, if we set aside the extremists on each side, the middle ground debate between well-informed people is often a battle between the following:

Progressives want to move society forward, but often in too centralized and artificial manner. At their best, they want to help the disenfranchised among us and focus on what they see as the bigger picture. At their worst, they get into eugenics and central control and underestimate the efficiency of market forces.

Conservatives often want to hold society where it is, even when resisting new change that could be good. At their best, they support responsibility and virtue and hard work, while at their worst, they harm new ideas or minorities that deviate from their local culture, and hold back good new ideas.

And how we interpret these forces changes over time. Sometimes science is at the forefront, and sometimes politics/culture is. Copernicus and Galileo were scientific progressives, and were punished for it despite being right. But then Marx and Woodrow Wilson were political progressives, and had success despite later being wrong in many ways. And then ironically, Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson were both considered progressive US presidents, but in many ways they couldn't be more different. Conservatives today have more respect for the former than the latter.

Both fundamental forces, progress and conservatism, are necessary. We need to move forward, but with awareness of our past. Cautiously progressive, and virtuously conservative. Humble in our presumed ability to control the world, but empathetic in our outreach to groups that don't necessarily fit within the existing culture. Something akin to Libertarianism fits the bill, but with more widespread support. When Libertarianism fails to catch on in any of 200 or so countries, its lack of success needs to be examined. Why isn't Libertarianism popular?

Some of this I argue is due to technology. The existing tech of fast transactions but slow settlements gives power to central banks and governments. Technology dictates politics.

For example, prior to the invention of the printing press, it wasn't possible to have a democratic republic over a large landmass. That required fast information transfer and widespread literacy. Ancient people were not "ignorant" to have their prior social structures; they outright lacked the technology to even attempt our current norms. And today, can we imagine if new technology makes our existing norms irrelevant? What if capital flows as freely as information flows? Does that change politics? I think so.

In the modern era, central planners have a technological edge. It's easy for them to consolidate the banks and central banks, since everything is reliant on credit-based transfers. The invention of bitcoin and fast non-credit transfer starts to mess with that, but it takes time with liquidity and network effects.

I expect the next few decades to change substantially. But as they do, I consider progressivism vs conservatism to be a useful framework to keep in mind. Openness to change vs preservation of what works well now. In all technological environments, era after era, this is ultimately the key social debate. As monetary technology stalled in recent decades, politics took center stage. As monetary technology advances over the next couple of decades, I expect that technology to start impacting and framing conversations more and more, as it starts setting the clear path.

Dunno if progressive vs consevative is the main political spectrum. For me it's individualists vs collectivists and then everything else.

I also wonder why libertarianism isn't more "popular". Maybe most people think it's good to force everyone to "share" a portion of their wealth and obey the govt, because we all are half-raised in govt controlled school system that shapes ones mind to accept the hierarchy. Doing things that don't make sense just because you are told to do them over and over.

So most people internalyze that as a pattern for many things in their life, expecting the same thing from other people too, even forcing them. Remember covid? If I suffer wearing the mask, you should too!

So asking people if the want to be a part of a bigger country or no is illegal and should be punished hard. Because of democracy right?

It is interesting to se politicians/etatists when in danger of losing power.

https://nitter.net/visegrad24es/status/1723683409032024280?cursor=ZAAAAPAdHBmmwsCzsZDi4Osv9IHWvbzq4Osv5obWufDc4OsvhsXQ3ef04Osv8MGz0cUSAPAI9oKzvdbV4OsvuILTrZHs4OsvvoW0yZ02APAKmoLX6ZS77esvqIS6_fiE4esvJQISFQQAAA#r nostr:note1lszj4fuwvlqwrmx0y5s8rjpp26qwvfvd3dfuva5g3ja5n8j859qs2kd2w7

Replying to Avatar 7fqx

⚡️⚡️⚡️

ESG funding from the money printer temporaly on pause:

Hansen of Circle:

1) yay regulation, govern us harder eu!

2) surprised pikachu - eu falls behind in adoption

3) it's all krypto scams anyway, good riddance, always use noKYC "onramps" with bitcoin

https://nitter.net/paddi_hansen/status/1719664860009476394#m

Tomu rikam efektivni vyuziti nakradenejch penez. "Neni kde setrit" a proto jsme se zasadili o usporny balicek, kde nesetrime a vsem zvedame dane.

Predpokladam, ze taky udelaj aplikaci co bude obcanum vysvetlovat, ze elektika je vlastne levna a ze green deal ji zlevnuje. Billboardy uz nejsou in, ted frcej appkovy kampane.

https://zpravy.aktualne.cz/domaci/vyborny-ministerstvo-pripravuje-aplikaci-na-pomoc-lidem-ohle/r~6126527a808b11eebe29ac1f6b220ee8/

Yes, but never underestimate the system ability to fuck everything up in order to save itself for little longer. A lot of people spent decades waiting for THE collapse while just getting grumpier and grumpier. It's a trap (which I don't say you are falling into) and it is great that bitcoiners mostly take the "we build a better system in parallel and you do you" way.