Dude, I am good with all kinds of fuckery on chain except OP_RETURN standardness. I think 40 bytes is too much. OP_RETURN means IGNORE, DO NOT RELAY THIS, but by makinging the field standard Core hacked the system. Knots is no better to have included 40 bytes.
Yes, in the input field and it HAS to be there.
Because it is always arbitrary no matter if it is thread::RNG or a name. Also you are conflating transactions and block headers.
Literally the coinbase is FOR arbitrary data to give a unique identifier to the block for entropic value. This has been an argument against spam TRANSACTIONS not spam block headers...
This marketing is trying to appeal to those tards who like inscriptions but using the coinbase tag (to actually add entropy and help mine) just like Satoshi did in the Genesis block.
Lol, you know that coinbase tags are not inscriptions you silly guy.
Trump Says Ukraine Can Win Back All Territory Lost to Russia
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/trump-says-ukraine-can-win-back-all-territory-lost-russia
Trump has absolute lost his mind.
The reason everything is political, everything relates to bitcoin, and everyone is so intense, is because the majority of us are honest actors trying to do a thing that others find valuable and live safely and comfortably.
The current system turns all of that into a zero sum game where your loss is another's gain and it is shown to you explicitly so.
To avoid this, one must remove the poison. The poison is a malleable ruleset. In short, the untrustworthiness of a trust based game.
You do not play games with those you do not trust. Yet, in this system, you must. The pain will continue until the poison is removed.
Get Bitcoin.
Lopp posted it on Nostr as well.
Okay, how exactly? Unless he literally copies the code to his project. Then there would be duplication issues correct? This is obviously more of a Github issue than a code commit, merge, or push issue but still.
Yeah, but the preceding math and QR translation is the actual hard part. Lol.
So doesn't that really make the argument that "Luke is the sole maintainer" more of a function of the fact that Knots is a fork of Core, than some sort of apathy? Given the contention between the two?
What's crazy is you can totally do that and do it all on paper creating private keys, doing the math to create the checksum, and writing out an entire transaction in hex.
I am a Charlie Kirk truther.
I think his neck just does that sometimes.
Good. I heard people were getting raptured and when death and birthdays are the same date it looks funny on a headstone.
Right so, what if the original project maintainers and I (the one who forked the project) don't get along? How would I be able to merge code without their permission?
Just a question, if I fork a project on Github and someone wants to put in a pull request, do they use my new project's Github or the original's?
And if commits are put in based on those pull requests how would anyone else beside the project owner sign and push them?
Why would they? Strategy is doing it for them.
Hidden message about steganography that you didn't see because you didn't know there was hidden data.
Dude, this guy is an obvious bot. Don't waste your time. Kotlin dev LOL!
It's the same thing as a securitized business stock. It's a way of abstracting the people, businesses, and hard labor that go into producing the actual things into a packaged item that fat cats on Wall Street can swap around to pump their bags.
Rizful after people start making fun of their marketing:

Damn, been seeing a lot of Rizful action on my feed, thanks for the heads up.
Yes. But also not mutually exclusive. Could have a Q/A team on top of a bunch of ruffians coding from a shoebox.
So, you understand what OP_PUSHDATA does?
And if so, why would making it useless be beneficial to Bitcoin's data structure?
What did you write a reference implementation? Or did you just download a program and run defaults, and project that on everyone else.
What happens when you use DATUM to solo mine? Also, that is a hell of a way to earn...1-2%
I don't even understand what is being said here.
Morals, rights, and protections are for your friends not your enemies. Your enemies will use your morals against you, to abuse you, to kill you. Then when you apply the rules they just made, they admonish you with your own morality.
"Defend the right to speak even for those you disagree with!"
- They kill you for your speech
When the threat of retribution is upon them they retreat to "I though you said: Defend the right to speak even for those you disagree with! Don't become a hypocrite!"
Fuck you. You do not tell me when and how and with whom I apply my morals. My friends have the right to speak, and live without fear. You have burned your good will with me and you SHOULD live in fear.
You have jumped into the raging river I begged you not to, now you live within the rocky dangerous rapids.
You have revealed your true moral axiom
"When I am weaker than you, I ask you for freedom because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you, I take away your freedom because that is according to my principles." -Frank Herbert
No longer.
Скриптонит - не расслабляйся
https://video.nostr.build/9e79ca1b2ef161568fcbc1c1fb76602ba22b0e378faba1e66d67b7d97519956e.mp4
Scriptonet ne passlablyaisenya? What does it mean!?
Again, you can't read or something. That's not what I'm talking about. This is under a thread talking about a separate relay network. Maybe you're reading this on Damus where it's very difficult to understand where the threat is going or where it's been.
Especially in a paradigm where we don't use the gossip relay network and we use something else. Those would be two entirely different programs. So there's no possible way that an unconfirmed transaction would be co-mingled with a confirmed one.
Oh weird, I didn't know that unconfirmed transactions are saved in the exact same spot that confirmed transactions are. Can you show me that data table because I was under a different impression.
Of course, you wouldn't be conflating the two, right? Because that would be absolutely silly.
Lol, I swear you wrote a bot to reply without reading and understanding what is being said. Read again, and think for longer.
Because even with a secondary layer of Tx relay, current Knots users would not relay txs they don't agree with. You still don't seem to understand property rights after all of these repsonses.
If you mean by "regular camera," the camera application on your phone, it just identifies the bytes encoded and spits out a string, number, or whatever the data might be. Most are numbers or URLs that can be useful depending on what application needs the data.
Well, that entropy got him the block so, I wouldn't care with 3 bitcoin coming my way.
Yes, just like any impulse it can be avoided or suppressed but it is no more bad or good than any other impulse. Take murderous thoughts about other bad drivers, it is solely acting upon this impulse that can be morally judged. Regardless or the supposed "source" of said impulse, bad driving or hormonal dysregulation.
What is "being gay?"
Do you mean having attraction to the same sex? Because an autonomic or subconscious is neither good nor bad, it just is.
If you mean, acting upon the impulse of homosexuality, then I could understand your position.
It would be if it were its own web protocol. But being build on TCP/IP limits nostr's overall power.




