I mean, no I haven't but I know Mechanic and he generally makes different arguments than I do but we end up in the same place.
Nah, I am just the tard wisperer and I was hoping to bridge the gap between normal people and autistics.
I took that quote to mean, the proliferation of spam creates bloated UTXO sets which is a side point not to do with the issue of choice. The Ethereum connection, I too don't see that. I basically give ethereum the "I don't think of you at all" Don Draper meme out of 10.
The ultimate problem is that there was no hard cap (outside of blocksize) for the amount of arbitrary data carrier field. That is a massive flaw especially considering visual data of certain kinds is very illegal for those who even possess it making Bitcoin by extension illegal to host. Even outside of legality, I don't think most people would willingly host CSAM on their FINANCIAL node. Seems like a bad use of data.
They are hoping someone relays CP around the network for them.
In a technical sense mempool allocations are strictly RAM. So storage has nothing to do with it. But, again this is a nonsense argument conflating two separate issues. Relaying transactions and relaying verified blocks. The node does both but one is protocol forced and the other is not. That is where the choice lies.
Dude, just read the code. Tell me where Luke put the "GET EM FEDS!" variable. If he did, I would be right there with you. But I haven't found it and neither have you (or else you'd be citing code lines instead of making moralistic or equivocation arguments).
Passing a message and repeating truth are two different things (as discussed ad nauseum)
If I say I BELIEVE a certain horse at the racetrack will win. That is an unconfirmed message.
If the announcer says my horse didn't win, I don't like that meassge but if someone asks, I have to tell them the truth, my horse didn't win.
THOSE ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS.
Please stop being obtuse.
Who is trusting? Can you read code will? Do you trust the checksum or are you verifying it? Read the code dude, show me where the trust variable is declared.
You can't run Libbitcoin btw... That shit doesn't work.
Are you reading a completely separate text then responding, or being obtuse? This is so weird. I have spoken with voice to a lot of these people and now it seems like people are reading from a sales script.
I want a sharp knife to cut my beef
-Do you worry about intruders because a knife wouldn't even stop them anyway!
No, I want to cut my food.
-You COULD cut your food with a spoon, do you really trust cutlery made by a guy who accidentally cut his thumb once!?
What the fuck is happening?
I don't say those things so, maybe just address concerns that I put forward. I would be a fan of Libbitcoin, if it actually worked (it doesn't). The point is all of the "changes" Luke makes are also toggles or fields that give users choice. I don't care if luke is a federal agent's prostitute if the code he writes gives me choice and it's open for audit. So, continually bringing up feds, spam prevention, and lost bitcoin is immaterial to the actual discussion. I DON'T CARE. The discussion is one group just updated the swiss army knife with 3 less screwdrivers and a different group added 5 more. I like more options not less. That's it.
I don't follow the point you are making. Changes equals bad because ????
If those changes are the removal of choice then sure but they aren't so, what are you trying to say?
Also, I responded to this post as well, so you can read that as well.
The non sequitur is relating the dev to feds when the code is all that matters. That was the original deflection. Following the path of deflection was still nonsense because there is the same argument for both.
You don't know what you are talking about.
Oh cool did they remove the OP return field entirely? Because that's the only way they would be removing "dead code".
-Removing a max field length makes an error, so it's not that.
-Setting a default length means there is a way to set the field.
So what "Dead code" did they remove? OH RIGHT! The user's ability to modify fields that THEY set. Disingenuous argument.
This isn't some depricated color palette on some shitty purple nostr app, this is a field people are currently exploiting in Bitcoin. To say "dead code" means you are dumb or lying.
Do you not know Gavin literally went to the feds to help them understand bitcoin better? How is that a non-sequitur, is Gavin not on the Core devs side?
This is all beside the point, the code matters not the people. And the Core code says I can't choose what transactions I relay, fuck that.
I love how you moved the goal post from "they aren't removing choices" to "well, luke is adding features you might not like either"
👌
*just* revert one change
Thats LITERALLY the change we are talking about. But go on call people "Knotsi" and make them seem crazy for wanting to have better control over the software they run.
As long as game devs sell licenses instead of games this will continue. Selling ROMs of games will make a come back and will differentiate itself from "live service" games. Live service used to be flash sites now it's entire game consoles and platforms.
Yeah, all of our wives are hot!
Check your O2 levels while you're sleeping. Might have some kind of apnea. Or at least respiratory blockage while unconscious.
You are free, that is the state of being of those who wish to be. Technology is a class of tool that frees you from a specific problem.
I was moreso asking what problem bitchat solves.
Sparkly Pizza? New hidden feature!
Bitcoiners have a way of filtering noise.
The concept of "News" is the propaganda. If you need to know something, you will know. The people you know will tell you. If they don't know, why do you need to? How does not knowing what is happening elsewhere materially affect your life?
"I think you should leave" is a fantastic absurdist comedy skit show. But that's basically all I put on there.
Sure but, that is just more confirmation that even if other miners DON'T relay those kind of transactions, you still CAN broadcast it.
The way it is currently implemented, yes. You can line river edges with funnel turbines that do not disturb fish. Creating a giant dam is bad for a number of reasons.
Not a fan of Zeuspay, BTCPay Server, or Zaprite?
Well, what does the mouth say? If it's a bust still let us know! If it's awesome, give us the deets.
Been kicking around this idea for a while to create a desktop p2p app replicating the lightning-poker.com site experience (with a few upgrades like private tables, optional names etc). I’ve got most of it mapped in my head, plenty of hurdles but it feels solvable.
Basic vision: a desktop app using p2p bittorrent style swarms to sync the game state. Provable fair shuffling using commit-reveal hash functions. Could even experiment integrating ecash to avoid a need for a lightning node to take deposits. Ecash tokens represented as chips immediately change ownership with each hand, removing any party holding funds during the game.
It’s a fun thought experiment but don’t hold back, tell me what I’m missing. Maybe I can refine this into a project worth pursuing.
#p2p #poker #lightning #ecash #cashu
nostr:npub1t3ggcd843pnwcu6p4tcsesd02t5jx2aelpvusypu5hk0925nhauqjjl5g4 nostr:npub1de6l09erjl9r990q7n9ql0rwh8x8n059ht7a267n0q3qe28wua8q20q0sd nostr:npub1puffxa96tjjh46cgwnsuse4uegewh0a05w6nmuu0cphcfggz6xasw6deee nostr:npub12zqf55l7l9vsg5f6ssx5pq4f9dzu6hcmnepkm8ftj25fecy379jqkq99h8 nostr:npub1el3mgvtdjpfntdkwq446pmprpdv85v6rs85zh7dq9gvy7tgx37xs2kl27r nostr:npub12r0yjt8723ey2r035qtklhmdj90f0j6an7xnan8005jl7z5gw80qat9qrx nostr:npub10npj3gydmv40m70ehemmal6vsdyfl7tewgvz043g54p0x23y0s8qzztl5h
nostr:npub1m50e65pv09ga73lglrkjgh5tlgj006pv9rce8xdg7rn5kps38gssh2glzq nostr:npub162zpxufpw8pnuytaf0gfxzkqtvk9rvcwkvppa7x57y3n7qkfpg4shatdhy nostr:npub1t04cvx3d0a3le22rgnekk20wvr3l4jpg93vkledsyakas96puqaqwm53m9 nostr:npub1x3n9jcp54npw2l6scvewdvy47jhvj30706u783nu2hktu6a8gc5q8f00qs nostr:npub1qhjxfxpjm7udr0agr6nuhuwf9383e4g9907g64r9hf6y4fh6t6uqpcp36k nostr:npub1lqz2yf2tvutrxwtfnlxtdt9vdam7lwkyk95kehavvm4gfm5rx7ws0p3ak9 nostr:npub18w72kl3a9vr625p8ypk4uxfcz0cpgp5g9k4dq4qj8zd9pdnm4yhqn5s7pw nostr:npub16e3vzr7dk2uepjcnl85nfare3kdapxge08gr42s99n9kg7xs8xhs90y9v6 nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s nostr:npub1ymt2j3n8tesrlr0yhaheem6yyqmmwrr7actslurw6annls6vnrcslapxnz
P.S lightning-poker team you’ve done great running this site for years. I mean no offense or ill will while exploring this idea
I mean techincally the mint would be holding the funds but beside the ecash specific issue I have, that looks pretty solid. Things I am thinking about:
What are some fail-state mitigations?
- What if a player disconnects mid-hand and tries to reconnect, what kind of hand timer will be implemented?
- What happens when a player busts, do they get removed from the seat or do they have a chance to buy in from their seat?
Are there auto action toggles? (Check/fold, call current bet, call any, fold) to make hands not wait on afk players.
Big blind avoidance protections? Not allow a player to "sit out" before their turn to be big blind the "sit in" afterwards in high player games.
nostr:nprofile1qqsgl84eraxfwfhxlwq7syalgxfu46cnz0z8s4httgdaj9rjhmgn7ncpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs7amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd4hk6qgkwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxummnw3ezucnpdejq7gw5f5 Has all of those qualities and more. 2 years dating (actual dating not hooking up) 1 year engaged, and now 6 years married. Thoroughly vetted and absolutely the best decision I have made.
Except the meme template having an error about the shapes and sizes of different regional races, I liek dis.
Exactly. You nailed it. If they can "freeze" your bitcoin address, you don't own it.
Asessing first principles allows one to see past the momentary data and extrapolate. I'd tell him I hope his fiat does better for ya bud