𝓗𝓪𝓹𝓹𝔂 𝓝𝓮𝔀 𝓨𝓮𝓪𝓻! Satho

I looked through those already, but didn’t find what I was looking for. Also tried to connect to eclair as external and it didn’t like it while complaining about returned format 🐶🐾🫡

Looking for documentation to setup BTCPayServer using already running bitcoin-core and Eclair node. If you know of any place where I can find it, please let me know! 🐶🐾🫡

#asknostr

Maybe Uncle Rockstar can help?

Goodnight and wabi sabi, Nostr! 🫂💜🤙🏻

?cid=2154d3d7f5hpuu5l0g7vc8eae37rb33atl31j7h4lqjovuf2&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g

Although having my LN address in self custody costs me many missed zaps and time spent maintaining the node, it’s still worth it! 🐶🐾🫡⚡️💯

It’s funny that most of us don’t know what we look like. What kind of bloke do you think i look like?

The delivery of your message comes across as a shit-lib that spends all of your time on reddit. Telling people to stop operating in some way isn't a viable strategy, even if you make it egalitarian. The behavior isn't broken, something else is.

1. Let me alienate every other chain via calling them "shitcoin" from get go.

2. Let me not engage the argument and instead complain people are raising concerns and act like BTC's uncriticizable.

Well done, you've won everyone's hearts and minds!

These occultist BTC maxi attitudes aren't helping but hurting BTC.

I wish you the best of luck preserving fragile divine balance of the LN channels w/ this attitude.

We can't use base chain because speed and high fees, now high fees disrupt the fragile balance of LN and it's balancing optimizations etc. now we need to be aware of this and use yet another BTC L2, liquid so we don't fuck the fragile balance of LN! Jesus! Who has time for all this? Why wouldn't the person just use Solana at that point? At what point do we admit to ourselves that we're on an unstable, overly complicated deck of cards that has little chance of adoption besides fringes of crypto technicals?

But that’s not a “rebalance”. That’s a lightning payment to a peer, where you receive in return an on chain UTXO or a liquid UTXO.

You’re sending a payment out of lightning, and you would have to have someone either directly receive your on chain UTXO or liquid UTXO, or swap it back for lightning liquidity and then route to the channel it would’ve settled in anyway.

So unless your goal is just to swap out onto the main chain or liquid, it doesn’t accomplish the same thing as circular rebalancing, or it does so in ultimately the same manner as a regular rebalance with a bunch of extra steps along the way.

This is still in Beta. Long way to go to make it best practice.

That’s just an on chain transaction with extra steps.

Every lightning transaction messes up peers channel balance. If you balance your channel, you are unbalancing someone else.

Circular balancing absolutely messes with your other peers. Peerswap involves only one Lightning invoice directly to your peer, 0 fees, and one on chain transaction.

I don’t think you get stuck HTLCs when circular rebalancing. I’ve only ever either been successful, or have had the payment time out and fail (or a few other errors like no route).

I’m not sure about knocking other peers channels out of balance. When you preform a circular rebalancing, you typically bring at least two channels into balance by sending a transaction to even them up. I suppose if it’s a route with a lot of hops there could be channels in between that become unbalanced but that’s definitely not a critical issue and is something each individual node needs to account for when setting their fees.

How does peerswap + liquid work without affecting your peers channel balance? Doesn’t sound right to me.

Isn’t the effect on channels the same?

Why don’t you like circular rebalancing? And how do high fees affect its success? I haven’t done it recently but I do it periodically and have never had an issue.