Avatar
John Christensen
dd69612be7f061eb93d0eb85889d11acf211f19741cea6b13a842f963024c0d8

I’m running an experiment

I would like to invite some friends to try using Nostr for the first time. I’m curious to see if the Nostr community would be willing to welcome my friends by sending them sats. So, as a test, “so I don’t look like a fool in front of my friends”, I was wondering if you guys could send me some sats just to see if it would work for them.

So… ya. Could I have some sats?

I think most people are on social media for entertainment right? Seems like people only comment if something makes them extremely mad or overwhelmingly happy. If you don’t hit either one of those extremes people probably won’t react… I’m not saying that it’s right I’m just saying it seems like that is how people are. What do you think? Am I off base here?

Ya, i might be crazy but I think Bitcoin might be one of Gods great gifts to the world. There is no denying that there is a sudo-spiritual aspect to Bitcoin.

Replying to Avatar NICO⚡️

I struggled with this for a while @HODL

I was an atheist / agnostic before I was very close to dying in 2015. I spent 7 days unconscious at the hospital. I didn’t have a “near death experience” hallucinations of the after life etc. Just darkness / nothingness. This is what I believe “hell” is, literal oblivion, it’s terrifying but it also brought extreme clarity that our actions in life matter and I connected with something that is not of this world while I was there.

After I came back and since then I can tell you without a doubt in my mind. 1000% certainty, God / Christ is real, It all happened, it’s all true, heaven is real, good is real, evil is real, the soul is real, being a good person is important, honesty / truth is important, integrity is import. Even when no one is looking.

Sometimes you’ll be hated for doing the right thing but things we’ll always end up working in your favor at the end. It’s like a cheat code to life to follow the “narrow path”.

He will always have your back and he hasn’t let me down once even in the darkest times you’ll see that it was for a reason at the end.

What you do in the mortal realm is what you’ll be judged for when it’s all over. Cannot explain it or show proof but I know it to be true in my core.

Also, once you feel it. It cannot be unfelt, it’s so obvious in your face but that’s the hardest part for most people because all the things you use to determine truth in the flesh (vision, hearing, logic) doesn’t apply. It’s a matter of the heart only and it’s extremely personal. You can be shown the door but only you can open it.

All that being said I don’t push my beliefs to anybody or try to convert people. Nor do I care what they do with their personal lives. I know if I do good, good things will happen to me and when I die (hopefully a long time from now) I will be alright. I do not fear death, it’s become clear to me that it’s a feature of being human, not a bug. Those who do evil or justify things in the name of God are larps because it’s extremely personal and only within you

nostr:note1d6r6rk0q0vha3cvgmlkv4mgjw44j3uhu56du6dtrxl29rzxhtxnqe5ksee

Every thing changes when you have an encounter with God.

I don’t think that everyone has a chance to have that encounter and that makes me sad

Once you see things you literally can’t explain and you are looking with your eyes and know it is real but it doesn’t make any sense based on how you think the world works it changes your mindset.

You better be careful giving out financial advice like that. The nostr moderators could block your account. 😂

# Bitcoin can’t scale!

Let me start by saying, I love Bitcoin. I mean, who doesn’t love the idea of digital money that’s decentralized, censorship-resistant, and run by math geeks instead of banks? But, like many things you love, it didn’t take long before I found out it wasn’t perfect. As I got deeper into Bitcoin, I hit a major snag—it couldn’t scale. And when you realize something you love has a flaw, it’s like finding out your favorite superhero can’t fly. Sure, they can still save the day, but now you’ve got to rethink how they do it.

### The Bitcoin Cash Detour: Bigger Isn’t Always Better

At this point, I was looking for answers, and that’s when Bitcoin Cash came along. It promised to solve Bitcoin’s problems by increasing the block size—more transactions, faster processing. Seemed like a no-brainer, right? It’s like upgrading your car’s engine so you can go faster. I thought, “Hey, maybe this is the right path!” So, I hopped on the Bitcoin Cash bandwagon for a bit.

But, as with any quick fix, the cracks started to show. You know that moment when you upgrade to a bigger smartphone, and suddenly it doesn’t fit in your pocket? That’s what Bitcoin Cash felt like. The bigger blocks meant more data, and more data meant it was harder for regular folks to run their own nodes. Suddenly, this thing that was supposed to be all about decentralization started leaning towards centralization—big players with big resources running the show. Not exactly the decentralized dream I signed up for. So, reluctantly, I realized that while Bitcoin Cash had its merits, it wasn’t the answer.

### Back to Bitcoin: Enter the Lightning Network

Returning to Bitcoin, I was still on the hunt for that elusive solution. That’s when I discovered the Lightning Network, and man, did it seem like the perfect answer. It promised instant, nearly fee-less transactions by taking most of the transactions off-chain. It was like finding a secret passage in a video game that lets you skip all the hard levels. I was stoked.

But, as anyone who’s ever tried to navigate a secret passage knows, it’s not always smooth sailing. The Lightning Network came with its own set of challenges—liquidity problems being the biggest one. Managing liquidity channels was like trying to keep a bunch of spinning plates in the air. If you got it wrong, you were either stuck or ended up relying on big players to keep things running smoothly. And just like that, the centralization monster reared its head again. Lightning was cool, but the more I dug into it, the more I realized it wasn’t the silver bullet I was hoping for.

### The Liquid Network: The Forgotten Solution

By now, I was feeling a bit like Goldilocks—one solution was too big, another was too complicated, and I was still searching for the one that was just right. That’s when I remembered something from my early Bitcoin days: the Liquid Network. I’d played around with it briefly before dismissing it as just another sidechain experiment. But hey, I was out of options, so I figured, why not give it another look?

And that’s when it hit me. The Liquid Network was like that old friend you haven’t talked to in years but who suddenly shows up at the exact right time with exactly what you need. Liquid wasn’t trying to do what Bitcoin or Lightning did—it was doing something entirely different. It’s designed for fast, private transactions between exchanges and big players, without clogging up the Bitcoin base layer. It’s like the express lane at the grocery store—if you’ve got 10 items or less, you zip through without slowing everyone else down.

### The Perfect Three-Legged Stool: Bitcoin, Lightning, and Liquid

It was then that I realized something profound. These three technologies—Bitcoin’s base layer, the Lightning Network, and the Liquid Network—weren’t competing solutions; they were complementary. Together, they form a perfect three-legged stool that balances security, scalability, and speed.

Here’s the deal:

1. **Bitcoin’s Base Layer**: This is the foundation, the bedrock. It’s decentralized, secure, and slow—but in a good way. It’s like the tortoise in the tortoise and the hare story. Sure, it’s not winning any speed races, but it’s rock-solid, and you can count on it to get the job done safely.

2. **Lightning Network**: Lightning is the hare—fast and nimble, perfect for quick, small transactions. But like the hare, it has its vulnerabilities. Managing liquidity is tricky, and it can start to centralize if you’re not careful. But it’s still an essential part of the ecosystem, allowing you to buy your morning coffee without waiting 10 minutes for a confirmation.

3. **Liquid Network**: Liquid is the middle ground, the express lane for bigger transactions. It’s private, fast, and doesn’t burden the Bitcoin base layer. It’s not as decentralized as Bitcoin, but it doesn’t need to be. It’s like the specialized tool in your toolbox—it’s not for every job, but when you need it, nothing else will do.

Together, these three form a system that’s resilient, adaptable, and, most importantly, decentralized where it counts. Bitcoin’s base layer remains secure and untouchable, Lightning handles the day-to-day transactions, and Liquid takes care of the big movers and shakers without compromising the core network.

### Conclusion: The Journey Was Worth It

Looking back, I’m glad I took the detour through Bitcoin Cash and struggled with Lightning’s complexities. Those experiences taught me the importance of trade-offs in technology, and that no single solution can do it all. But together, Bitcoin, Lightning, and Liquid create a robust system that’s ready to scale, ready to innovate, and ready to meet the needs of users worldwide.

So, here I am, a bit older, a bit wiser, and a lot more confident in Bitcoin’s future. I’ve found my perfect three-legged stool, and it’s holding up just fine.

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

Of the four Pierce Brosnan Bond movies, the first one was great (Goldeneye, so good), the second one was decent (Tomorrow Never Dies actually has a lot of relevance today, as it's about the control of corporate media with misinformation, which is rather prescient for 1997), and the final two were bad.

Of the five Daniel Craig Bond movies, I differ a bit from the consensus. The consensus is that the first (Casino Royale) and third (Skyfall) were great, but that the second, Quantum of Solace, was the worst and the others were okay.

However, while I do think the first Craig movie (Casino Royale) was great, and Skyfall was the second best, I think Quantum of Solace as the second movie was underwhelming but not bad. It was kind of that middle-of-trilogy vibe. I rate it above the consensus. The true catastrophe of this series, which I rate below the consensus, was actually the fourth movie Spectre. Utterly awful in terms of plot, especially given Bond's greatest villain Blofeld played by Waltz, which is such a strong casting. They fucked the whole story up and it made no sense. Bond literally walked into the evil headquarters with no plan, and got captured. And then when the villain is drilling into his head to erase his memories, it just randomly didn't work, and he broke free via bad narrative. Made absolutely no sense. People were too accepting of it because they liked Waltz on screen and he distracts them from how weak his character was and how bad the plot was. And Blofeld was way too obsessive with Bond. Cool villains aren't as obsessive as that. And then the fifth one was solid and partially salvaged the catastrophe that was Spectre. Kind of mediocre like Quantum of Solace, but with a solid and surprising climax to the series, which elevated and completed it.

Goldeneye really did set the bar high, and yeah, Tomorrow Never Dies feels oddly relevant now. With Craig’s movies, it’s interesting how people see Quantum differently—it might not be as flashy, but it had its own vibe. Spectre could’ve been epic, especially with Waltz as Blofeld, but it felt like they missed the mark. The fifth one definitely wrapped things up better though. It’s cool to hear a different take.

I think bathroom art is under appreciated. I almost always spend at least a little time looking at it. Even though we all have our phones now. I know it gets a glance or two.