?cid=2154d3d7jgd19u5uz3e5gnk3cck5u36z4sz4pnthxgoofct3&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g
🐸 🧡 🌏 more than the nudie mags.
?cid=2154d3d7uzje5jz87hwxhm0nlj99pcevfxo4dgidye0v3jo2&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g
IM ALREADY IN ENOUGH TROUBLE! HUSH ABOUT THE TOLIET STASH!
I just have to give myself reminders. My life is sorta like that movie Memento.
She got really loud and started speaking Franglish at me. I dunno what to do.
😂🤣 this is the first time she has asked about our bank statement
I explained and she was like meh…that’s fine.
Good evening. Always stay humble, stack sats, and live life dangerously 🤙 🏴☠️🫡 
I don’t proclaim to be a cardiologist, so forgive my ignorance…
But I remember when stenosis of the Left Anterior Descending (LAD aka Widow Maker) artery and requiring 3 or more stents was an indication for bypass surgery.
Now I see people with double digit stents and multiple people with several stents in the LAD.
Fiat incentives…few.
nostr:npub1xy54p83r6wnpyhs52xjeztd7qyyeu9ghymz8v66yu8kt3jzx75rqhf3urc nostr:npub18678fyrar7fg7gy77ggwsuk2cqe74ull38ng2v5x63werc63a70qw02kgq nostr:npub1m6gvtkek5sq3l82cfh7p3hs62ujxs6r8npre8m6jvvcm28utg05sde2e6g nostr:npub1jdvvva54m8nchh3t708pav99qk24x6rkx2sh0e7jthh0l8efzt7q9y7jlj
I am but a humble EMR cash register aficionado, but I don’t recall the most recent ACC guidelines making a strong commitment or recommendation for “less complex” multivessel lesions on PCI vs. CABG intervention. If bad anatomy with high SYNTAX score me thinks CABG is recommended (depending on other health factors obviously).
Also what’s considered complex for some may not be as complex for others depending on the pump bro or gal running the show.
Three stents to one vessel sounds sorta complex to me, but I also know shit about fuck.