Avatar
OriginalSize
deba262b2d87f7ed1252241e607bd1bbf42e67354992f89e7536d65d7a19e423
100% alpha and stack sats. Shrinkflation-proof. Never KYC. Peace.

Problem: Comments on problems don't show attribution

I commented on "Problem: the Nostrocket problem tracker is clunky and annoying to use" and while I can see my comment, nobody else knows it was authored by me. At least I'm not seeing the attribution from Spaceman. This means bad behavior may persist longer than it would if attribution were clear. It also makes it hard to carry on a conversation using the usual @user convention that people are used to.

Intrigued by Nostrocket.org. Love the problem-focused, reality driven development approach.

None of this is set in stone. My advice is to merge more of the NIPs PRs to increase velocity of specs. Then all the proven problems will be dealt with that much faster.

It really varies. Sometimes I get so pulled in it isn't needed but other times I put on gaming streams. This started as watching then getting bored and starting to write while it's on.

My big problem is getting into publishing mode. I've been missing a good desktop client for Nostr but with Primal I'm here able to write longer stuff. Hopefully this sticks... and I don't bore you all.

The other thing I'm trying is an app with task-based timers. Hope to spend hours tomorrow working more deeply rather than clicking around so much.

Can't decide if it's better calling it an ATM teller or an ATM machine.

Save your sats. You probably don't have enough. That being said, getting splicing deployed into all the lightning clients is maybe not research-level but I think good bang for the sat.

Seems like a good time to consolidate utxos if you've got some piled up. #bitcoin

Corporations hold a ton of Bitcoin. What does that mean? What does self-custody look like for a corporation and how much of this is in self-custody anyway?

Much like for an individual, self-custody should mean exclusive access to spend those coins, or more exactly that only corporation-approved process could lead to valid signatures.

Government or criminal raids don't necessarily equal access to keys. For example many tech companies have a process to wipe and/or brick hardware in such emergencies.

I suppose this gets to details that wouldn't be widely known like who has access to keys. Is it a custodial service like Coinbase? Is it the c-suite? Some set of crypto-notaries? Plus how many signatures are required from how many keys?

Fundamentally, the extent to which these bitcoin treasuries are secure against government confiscation affects whether this concentration is good or bad for Bitcoin.

Terrorists use LLCs? I thought they had their own niche Terror Capitalist entities.

Grocery bill?

About tree fiddy.

Breaking: Groceries are now more expensive. Bitcoin accordingly.