Problem: Comments on problems don't show attribution
I commented on "Problem: the Nostrocket problem tracker is clunky and annoying to use" and while I can see my comment, nobody else knows it was authored by me. At least I'm not seeing the attribution from Spaceman. This means bad behavior may persist longer than it would if attribution were clear. It also makes it hard to carry on a conversation using the usual @user convention that people are used to.
To me the idea of claiming a problem is itself problematic, because it introduces a lock where it's not really necessary. Patches or pull requests should be invited from all comers and merged quickly so the doers can build momentum.
The main issue for me here is that all the problems are semi-expanded on first view. This means lots of scrolling. Plus like many users I'm accustomed to a list of issues that I can click into to comment, reference, etc.
I'm requesting to join the Nostrocket Identity Tree and claiming my permanym: OriginalSize
Intrigued by Nostrocket.org. Love the problem-focused, reality driven development approach.
nostr:npub1mygerccwqpzyh9pvp6pv44rskv40zutkfs38t0hqhkvnwlhagp6s3psn5p did you ever post this RDD concept as a separate note?
My new favorite post on Nostr.
https://habla.news/u/gsovereignty@nostrovia.org/lqPpwQNzPWe5NzUD8gyDB
None of this is set in stone. My advice is to merge more of the NIPs PRs to increase velocity of specs. Then all the proven problems will be dealt with that much faster.
It really varies. Sometimes I get so pulled in it isn't needed but other times I put on gaming streams. This started as watching then getting bored and starting to write while it's on.
My big problem is getting into publishing mode. I've been missing a good desktop client for Nostr but with Primal I'm here able to write longer stuff. Hopefully this sticks... and I don't bore you all.
The other thing I'm trying is an app with task-based timers. Hope to spend hours tomorrow working more deeply rather than clicking around so much.
Lets not mince words.
Automated ATM Teller Machine.
Save your sats. You probably don't have enough. That being said, getting splicing deployed into all the lightning clients is maybe not research-level but I think good bang for the sat.
Seems like a good time to consolidate utxos if you've got some piled up. #bitcoin

Corporations hold a ton of Bitcoin. What does that mean? What does self-custody look like for a corporation and how much of this is in self-custody anyway?

Much like for an individual, self-custody should mean exclusive access to spend those coins, or more exactly that only corporation-approved process could lead to valid signatures.
Government or criminal raids don't necessarily equal access to keys. For example many tech companies have a process to wipe and/or brick hardware in such emergencies.
I suppose this gets to details that wouldn't be widely known like who has access to keys. Is it a custodial service like Coinbase? Is it the c-suite? Some set of crypto-notaries? Plus how many signatures are required from how many keys?
Fundamentally, the extent to which these bitcoin treasuries are secure against government confiscation affects whether this concentration is good or bad for Bitcoin.
Terrorists use LLCs? I thought they had their own niche Terror Capitalist entities.
Grocery bill?
About tree fiddy.
Breaking: Groceries are now more expensive. Bitcoin accordingly.
On one end we have slow theft. On the other government harrassment. In the middle is the no-KYC kindling of a new culture.

