Know yo peeps.

#keepitreal

nostr:note12juear80828ecx6uzt0y483jucd9mhelszetd3esvv8czmzru38s37vftj

This needs to be a game on nostr.

Heck yea!!

nostr:npub1n0stur7q092gyverzc2wfc00e8egkrdnnqq3alhv7p072u89m5es5mk6h0 wd be great if links to deep notes (within a thread) auto-scrolled the thread to display the target note.

Kinda tired of always scrolling, and fearing that I may scroll too far or (even worse) tap on another note while scrolling.

Thanks for making THE BEST client on IOS (custom feeds, multiple accounts, search [mostly] works) ♥️♥️

Sorry. Typo.

https://nostrmeet.me/

>”If we replace the second condition with just 'Follows the new account' then it might work. But I can't promise to deliver this soon “

The historical data “for all users” is gonna be the most challenging. After this, Getting data for new users will be easier.

- “First follow of new account” can be “assumed” to be first in contact list.

- “Follows new account within 24 hours” can be changed to “follows new account”

- “is author or recipient of first note or DM with new account” will be challenging when NIP-44/17 gift wrapped private messages takes main stage…. But that’s a tomorrow problem?

>”Do you really need the confirmation in numbers to keep building your onboarding tool?”

Due diligence. This is all. I’m building already.…

It’s one thing for me (as a know nothing nobody) to assert that “social onboarding” is nostr’s super power. But evidence speaks louder than words.

If the numbers demonstrate it’s effectiveness … then more tools will be developed to support. … then advocates will work in earnest rather than with small hopes … then nostr leverages it’s close community to accelerate the growth of a trusted user base … then nostr has real networks of trusted friends to buffer the coming onslaught of bots and bad actors to its open protocol.

Open is hard. Connecting humans is key. Evidence helps motivate. IMHO

Let’s work together on this …

lol. That seems like just the thing a Costco would sell in Costa Rica.

Yup. That’s what I figured. Sorry for all the Qs. Thanks.

That’s about 4%. I’ve seen lightning fees that high… to set up a new channel … cause your current channel won’t handle 2k in btc?

>“You have to choose”

Do you mean “you” the user or “you” the developer?

A user might “choose” what kind of note to publish.

A developer might “choose” how to process the notes.

Who is “you” and what would be this “choice” that affects privacy over transparency? (Thanks)

I make friends.

Work well with others.

Encourage collaboration.

Are these centralizing forces?

Does decentralization suffer from lack of cooperation?

#asknostr #decentralize

nostr:npub1xdtducdnjerex88gkg2qk2atsdlqsyxqaag4h05jmcpyspqt30wscmntxy maybe I could work with you to (build a query) that powers another graph on stats.nostr.band?

“retention of trusted users onboarded by trusted users” (for comparison to “retention of trusted users”)

Such a graph could reinforce Nostr’s budding “social onboarding” community (which also brings new users into existing “webs of trust”) through “proof of benefit” that word of mouth is actually effective and worthwhile to support.

So… after nip-17 gift wrapping… only receiver npub and approx date sent (within .5 week) will be available for query? Sounds like a dead …

I’m looking to create a metric for measuring the success of “social onboarding”, wherein nostr advocates invite and offer onboarding support to their fiends. I’d like to measure this via notes and DMs sent or received (as well as first follows and followers) for new accounts.

I have a hunch that these types of new accounts (having measurable onboarding support from a nostr advocate) will turn out to be retained longer and that an advocates award program could increase their numbers.

nostr:note1h6zulynypwy32zdsaw0x5nfhmw2h2v7drdfkky4mqr0apuc8sghs3yzurw

Yes.

nostr:npub1wmr34t36fy03m8hvgl96zl3znndyzyaqhwmwdtshwmtkg03fetaqhjg240 ? nostr:npub18ams6ewn5aj2n3wt2qawzglx9mr4nzksxhvrdc4gzrecw7n5tvjqctp424 ? nostr:npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqn ? looking to query nostr data for onboarding research. Hoping for a bit of guidance. Point me in the right direction?

I need to build a query to collect data from Nostr to understand if “social onboarding” actually results in better retention than the control data charted on nostr.band “retention of trusted users”. (Below)

With “social onboarding” being already practiced by (what I call) nostr advocates, who invite and mentor their friends to nostr. The query would identify an advocate by looking at first posts and follows of all accounts:

Advocate = is the first follow of a new account + follows the new account within 24 hours + is author or recipient of first Note or DM with the new account + “engages” with new account “regularly” during a period + is “trusted” by trust.nostr.band

For use in upcoming Advocate Awards:

nostr:npub1advc8wuyjh7e230xrpafhy2zd3f40kuy5yfat09zj27rcxzfg4ys997ukp

A bit of consultation (for this noob nostr dev) would be appreciated.

nostr:npub1xdtducdnjerex88gkg2qk2atsdlqsyxqaag4h05jmcpyspqt30wscmntxy ? Anybody?

nostr:note1sdqu263xaq95fkdlnejgrgkqnpf2rapte8nfq6v3kzc37jw2npsqv5vr2u

nostr:npub1n0stur7q092gyverzc2wfc00e8egkrdnnqq3alhv7p072u89m5es5mk6h0 does this. ❤️

Nip 44 “author & date” is the only metadata available for query?

Sounds ominous.