nostr:npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqn wondering if NIP 04 is on its way out? Will DM “to and from” metadata be inaccessible for queries in the (near) future?
- Stashed all changes to last working commit. Noop.
- Restarted server. Relaunched browser. Quit other apps. Noop.
- Reboot computer…
- back to normal. For now.
I thought so also. But have commented out all async function calls. Still broke.
But maybe I should run behind a cache… on localhost? … that’s new to me.
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=1098x1920&blurhash=%5DLO%3A%40t%3FQ_0xV%25L%3DYR%2BS5R%2CWXIuV_oIxsxs-yIXWGRka%24-%25t5RlM%7ERnEA%251s%2BoKWB%7EJ9cRoR%2Boe0E%25Kxpxrt2in%25dW%2CbHR*&x=653f0a7a2b12c655df7ea044cf2a7c49ca3ab6466948c09f973a14a9e60db937
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=1052x1920&blurhash=%5DKQTAmt0%3FZxr%25M%3FPIWRoRnog%25La%23WBfRay4%7D%25Js*t4oc%7EJD%2CNLNJWYIexsoIt5axN2ock9oej%5B%5E_N1RlRla%2304xpxts%2Cs%3A&x=bed303de6d6b971ed40e396b56a2d1335fe8a2bd7cccab8fb45d7525c87b9282Thanks Diyana for speaking up. What you want for nostr is what many of us want. Let’s keep the fire lit to power up nostr with real connections!!
I also expected all anon accounts with black hoodies and such. Pleasantly surprised at how many real people I’ve met. Honestly… the “in person” experiences are where it’s at. Let’s do more of these!! #Chicago #nostrplebes #meetup
Vite is killing me! Spinning pages without errors won’t load. First one, now all routes are dead now. Won’t even serve. Out of the blue on localhost. Ruining my chill. Anybody?
#nostrdev #asknostr #nodejs #svelte #vite
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=768x1020&blurhash=_GI%3B-S009v%7EoE2xWNH%7EUt7IAS%7E%25fROW%3F8_g3Mwt7t7IU%25L4T%25g%25Ka0xWNHt5xtxu%5E*MxkCxuIVM%7B%25LRjslo%23tRIUM%7BRPRkozM%7Bozj%5BV%40WVg3n%24RjRkkDNGof-%3AaeM%7BozkC&x=6d4c00f87dfd5968bd248705b0f34d57010c330e14364e036785ed442312bbd6
(takes the bait :shrug:)
My vegan raw foodie friends were doing their thing LOOOOONG before y’all keto meatheads took the torch. Y’all both right about Whole Foods for health, but meat (or no meat) has nothing to do with it.
decentralized infrastructure after catastrophic event…
nostr:note19sfh8uvt0an9tq6y2ntfhfns7wwycsg8nu7hg5mtt2sk3y972zqqatlv5g
They keep getting better 🤭
https://nostrcheck.me/media/public/nostrcheck.me_7555382630641970001705689406.webp
Thanks for sharing your videos and comments here. Not on YT or other socials. Nostr is just better. Thanks for humoring us all.
But… rainbows are for everyone! Sexual and gender identity may have the lime light… but srsly… all rainbows?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/18/bill-ban-pride-flags-florida
Naw…!
Good luck with all that. User feedback is a desert wasteland. Like pulling hairs, or Herding cats, Or abdominal surgery on oneself. Ouch. Never goes how you hoped.
Best we can do is team up with UX and dev professionals hand in hand. Two eyes Looking in and two looking out. Hope for the best as we charge fwd.
Thank you. While discussing the social onboarding client we are working on, nostr:npub1san22nhe59ct8pstcehav4dtkf94lkn46ltl7d30g3zzl00tg7ussgqjdd suggested identity verification as a high priority. He drafted a document describing a signing procedure wherein individuals could cryptographically sign off on the validity of each others’ profile fields, for a PGP style distributed ranking system. We’re working on this.
As I see, There could be multiple NIPs drafted for nostr’s WOT implementation, all working together under an API defined by a “WOT implementor NIP”.
Given that there MUST be multiple “layers” (some known some yet unknown) to trust and identity verification AND that all clients SHOULD be consistent in their “end user” presentation of trust rankings (a check or something), it makes sense to me that there should be a dedicated “WOT implementor NIP” just describing how this presentation should enfold and an API of sorts for various WOT ranking tools to “plug in” to.
Each user could then choose the trust ranking tools that make sense to them.
To your point, the ranking system COULD implement a 1-100 scale in the back end, with a “min threshold” settings for end users. (Though some WOT ranking tools may only output a simple Boolean) IMHO, the trust ranking presentation itself (in the UX) should be Boolean (trusted or not, for specific apps/use cases) and could be determined by the user’s “min threshold” setting.
My random thoughts. But bottom line… WOT needs to at least be extendible and have a consistent UX defined by NIP.
Mostly harmless.
Young Progressives fear the “chaos” that comes with decentralization. They actually abhore freedom of choice. Would rather public is mandated to “do the right thing” than let “anarchy” decide.
Old progressives have given up already. They are either too set in their ways to GAF or too jaded by progressive failures to keep imagining.
I had to abandon progressive conditioning to come anywhere close to Bitcoin.
Thats my stupid take.