Avatar
<old>cypherhoodlum
e17273fbad387f52e0c8102dcfc8d8310e56afb8f4ac4e7653e58c8d5f8abf12
I try to avoid posting from this profile. npub1h00dlum44jnxdjeqms0d9s0l0n0lslv84mcw5420qpu277d8y4mqpv0cnf <-- my main profile
Replying to Avatar waxwing

Did you ever stop and *really* think about what it means to "do a Satoshi Nakamoto"?

Context for my weird question: I have met many, many bitcoiners over the years. Many of them take a stab at keeping privacy by doing some combo of: not revealing name, not revealing location, not revealing face. Etc. So often, if I happen to meet them in person, they end up revealing the things that they were hiding online. Quite literally a mask came off (pre covid!) once we started drinking - a simple, funny anecdotal example of what I mean. Many complain about photos being taken, many focus on always using a pseudonym. I'm sure most people reading recognize these patterns of behaviour.

I can see the purpose, up to a point, so this is not criticism. It's a little like me doing coinjoin "here and there" - you don't expect to defend yourself against a hyper powerful aggressor, only against a casual criminal looking for an easy score.

But if you do want *real* defence against *strong* attackers, you have a huge problem. These half-measures will be useless, perhaps worse than that, if you get overconfident, because the determined investigator only needs *one* strand to pull on, and the measures I describe above, which are almost always rules only half-stuck to anyway, don't cut it, at all.

Which brings me to my point: is it even possible to "go all the way"? Clearly it is; Satoshi Nakamoto is not the only person who's ever done it, but it's pretty damn rare at the very least.

Imagine what it would mean. If you are engaged in a serious project, that takes let's say at least a year's worth of full time work, then you are going to do that for no reward. Not just, no money, people do that quite often when it comes to things they genuinely enjoy, but no recognition, no social context, not even "oh I won't bother you because I know you're busy with that project". Nobody will say that because nobody will know. Imagine doing a full, intense 8 hour day of work (more likely, split over many days) and knowing that there will *never* be a direct reward of any form, for that. And then doing it again, and again.

What's more, you don't just "not get a reward". You have to do almost double the work, to ensure that at every step, every pushed commit or technical discussion, does not expose anything at the network trace level, or the language, vocabulary etc. Managing tricky pseudonym accounts, handling the headaches of Tor etc. I'm not trying to say it needs super-genius level tech skills, I'm trying to say it's a massive amount of effort.

Could you do that? I daren't even ask the question of myself, because I'm almost sure it's a no. But to *imagine* where that kind of motivation would come from, that's what fascinates me.

Truly an inspiration to all of us nyms. Satoshi the standard takes a new meaning.

It'd be neat to notify people who don't have a lightning address set up how much people would like to zap them

I really want to see a movie about the courtly adventures of Craig Wrong.

TORMUND: You have to keep moving. That's the secret. Walking is good, fighting is better, fucking is best.

But that's the thing. Google *is* forcing us to use Google. Google is there when you browse the internet, whether you know it or not. Whether you consent to the analytics or not. And that's not the only problem. Google is also the gatekeeper of the Internet. If a site is not indexed by Google, it doesn't really exist.

"So we had this burglar in a horse mask kicking down windows, sorry, breaking down down windows with his... hooves...and....

...so give me some money, yeah?"

Replying to Avatar corndalorian

Tiktok next kid on the block wait what

Tiktokers don't even know it comes before "next block"