Avatar
DoubleYouSee23
e2e66eb1a74a69f10942ef925a0c42788fc6529102a3e98d6b188693882673a2
--Vires In Numeris-- #Bitcoin #Bisq #Trezor

Everyone was hanging out, having a good time, and then some of y'all had to go and get weird on everybody.

Reminds me of lawnmower man, another cyberpunk adjacent movie

What are yours?

It makes me sad how few cyberpunk movies exist.

Johnny mnemonic

Existenz

The Final Cut

Max headroom

Strange Days

bonus: Dark City (it just is, okay?)

Is there an optimal number of relays to use? How do I find more unpaid relays?

Arch was one of my first attempts to use linux, it did not go well...

I've actually been meaning to give it another go now that I have at least some clue what I'm doing. I like the idea of a custom built, rolling release operating system.

To oversimplify, there are 3 types of linux distros that are different enough to not be fully compatable. Debian based (ubuntu) use .deb packages and tend to be for the average user. Fedora/redhat distros use rpm and tend to be for enterprise users. Then there's Arch, for masochists. Each use a few different terminal commands as well, so sticking to one flavor can be simpler.

Paper wallets and seed backups are two different things, in case you didn't know.

Paper wallets are generally considered deprecated at this point, and ahould be avoided. A seed backup, on metal preferably, is highly recommended to secure your wallet no matter what.

Of course. Paper wallets are kinda terrible. IIRC the trezor (first hardware wallet) was made after a plumbing leak destroyed paper wallets that were stored in a fireproof safe.

Digging through some old files and found this one. I should make a nostr version one day.

Interesting experiment into privacy, mired by a scammy beginning. The emission curve is terrible, early miners who knew to uncripple the code own most monero that will ever exist, and the tail emission is a handwavy attempt to dismiss this. Most transactions prior to 2017 werent private, but try getting a monero fan to admit that, and hope that no such flaw exists today.

Subject: law vs technology

From: Wei Dai

Date: Fri, 10 Feb 1995 13:32:02 -0800

Recently there's been a great deal of discussion on this list

about upcoming legislations (HR666 S314 etc.). Maybe it's time

to step back a little and look at the bigger picture. I've

been assuming (perhaps incorrectly) for some time that most

cypherpunks hold a belief somewhat like the following:

There has never been a government that didn't sooner or later

try to reduce the freedom of its subjects and gain more control

over them, and there probably never will be one. Therefore,

instead of trying to convince our current government not to

try, we'll develop the technology (e.g., remailers and ecash)

that will make it impossible for the government to succeed.

Efforts to influence the government (e.g., lobbying and

propaganda) are important only in so far as to delay its

attempted crackdown long enough for the technology to mature

and come into wide use.

But even if you do not believe the above is true, think about

it this way: If you have a certain amount of time to spend on

advancing the cause of greater personal privacy (or freedom, or

cryptoanarchy, or whatever), can you do it better by using the

time to learn about cryptography and develop the tools to

protect privacy, or by convincing your government not to invade

your privacy? I argue that since there are many more people

doing the former (EFF, CPSR, etc) than latter, that you'd be

more effective if you spent the time on the former.

Wei Dai

Replying to nobody

#[2]

Reminds me of the gpd pocket.

Very awesome laptop