Avatar
CB
ecad7a30a24bd09fd0f009e38e5b5f81e41d43e36d7f353edb0a6c2272fd87f4
property, speech, privacy, & signal

I feel like many people prefer to be told what’s important. Perceived as easier than curating what’s really important to them. Wanting something gamified so they can tell if they’re “winning” maybe. 🤷‍♂️ Not advocating; just feel that’s what we’ve been taught is important by existing algorithms. “We all know the nightmare” … Yes, we’ve been living that nightmare for 10+ years. Let’s try something different.

G’bye. Enjoy the weather!

I have similar feelings, but I’m not a big social media person. It reminded me of early Internet days when I stopped dialing into BBSs. Sort of what I had envisioned the Internet would be. Only took 30 years. 😏

Anyone gone down the copyright and patent 🐇 🕳️?

“The crucial distinction between patents and copyrights, then, is not that one is mechanical and the other literary. The fact that they have been applied that way is an historical accident and does not reveal the critical difference between them.

The crucial difference is that copyright is a logical attribute of property right on the free market, while patent is a monopoly invasion of that right.”

-Rothbard (Man, Economy State…)

The library of babel had me even rethinking my views on copyright.

https://libraryofbabel.info/

GM nostr frens! ☕️🌞

Hope you’re all enjoying the weekend!

#grownostr #coffeechain #plebchain

Replying to Avatar HoloKat

I’m not sure if we’ve considered all of the implications of mixing money with social, but it’s a fun experiment regardless.

The people that say zaps are the new likes… I like your adventurous spirit, but feel maybe there’s more to money and social than meets the eye.

When you introduce money into an app which doesn’t have a primary goal of sending money, it can get weird in terms of social dynamics and perception.

For example, content may become tailored towards getting zaps, drowning out other types of interactions and possibly eroding trust and cooperation between people.

There’s also the weird dynamic of comparison. Even if you don’t try to, your mind may drift into “oh, they are making more than me on their notes”. I know likes elicit a similar feeling of envy (even if you are not actively envious), but I am curious how money changes things. I don’t have all the answer and suspect there are deep psychological implications.

There may be misalignment of goals as well. This is already evident now where we have some people who are solely focused on stacking. We have automated accounts who post AI generated work that wasn’t created by them — presumably for the sake of stacking sats (otherwise why not credit?) And this is just the start. I don’t know how many of you are familiar with Steemit, but it’s basically a shitcoin website that monetizes content. If you go to the site now, it’s a steaming pile of shit. I doubt anyone actually reads anything. Maybe a few.. but you don’t see this website in the headlines or popping up on any meaningful channels online. As far as the world is concerned it’s invisible. Not saying zap-powered content will end up in the same boat, but there are probably lessons to be learned there and things we can observe.

Social serves a larger goal than just weeding out signal in noise. Not everything needs to provide value all the time. People come to be heard, to feel part of a group, to laugh, to hate… and none of those things involve money. I’m not saying they couldn’t, but we don’t know the full consequence of introducing money into these types of interactions.

I’m not advocating for something being right or wrong or how to do this or that, but more generally curious about the intersection of social and money. I’m here for the ride to see how things play out and how the world reacts to it. 

If you have any knowledge on this subject (psychology of money in social interactions), I’d love to hear your thoughts and perspective.

Thank you for that!! Not sure how I feel about zapping from moment to moment. It really is a matter of perspective, and too much focus on the money aspect can be a bad thing.

Do I just 🤙 or ⚡️ a note like this? Is doing so bad etiquette and spammy? I’m probably going to do both because I would rather err on the side of how I feel about the content. Does that make it a competition? Yes, I’d say for many, yes. It may also make some uncomfortable on the receiving side.

I don’t know if you make it up to the poster whether something can be zapped, or quite possibly privately vs. publicly zapped. Or provide that level of customization from both sides. I’m sure that adds complexity and my brain melts trying to think of the justifications and scenarios.

I feel strongly about few things:

1) Adding value exchange absolutely works and is imperative in some form.

2) We should all try to be flexible because what sounds great in one scenario may not work in another.

3) That optionality is just as important. Both opting-in & out. Slow moves and find consensus.

This isn’t like agreeing on the next block, and we are not all nodes running the same software.

Happy Birthday! Is that gold leaf on it. Looks delicious!

Oh, he’ll get his. That was for reminding me. 😊

“Both of them smiled derisively. But Francisco seemed to laugh at things because he saw something much greater. Jim laughed as if he wanted to let nothing remain great.”

Replying to Avatar Derek Ross

Do you know what I find most interesting about the 10 million dollars that nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m donated to nostr:npub10pensatlcfwktnvjjw2dtem38n6rvw8g6fv73h84cuacxn4c28eqyfn34f. The amount donated is meaningful in itself, but that's not the most interesting part of the announcement. The fact that 5 million is to go towards #Bitcoin development and 5 million is to go towards #Nostr development. That means they're equally important. And, we all know how important Bitcoin will be to the future of the world, right? That's how important Nostr can be if we work hard enough. Wild. 🤯 When people realize this, they'll come, and we'll be ready.

They’re very synergistic. While I try to value things in sats that number always moves. I always thought it would be difficult to gauge different fiats to sats as bitcoin monetizes.

A few days of zapping and I know what 21/42/500/5K/15K sats equates in my local fiat, and I feel better exchanging value having experienced this. Nostr really has a chance of boosting the circular economy beyond what I imagined.

Thank you! Just the Clear Cache did it. Good to see your profile again.