ef
nobody
efb8614ca2ab15152fffa65317a2ff8aa556a9cc9b312d774813042b7f8f11d7
account deleted

Anyone who gets #bitcoin but doesn't get #nostr actually doesn't get bitcoin.

Facts. nostr:note1haasdz4d00yjzy7sq6ue5l0sljwhk3xrdygxw9j9q2aa2vm8gs5qxydf6h

Replying to Avatar Sikto

😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣 Gold.

Well that's pretty modern. I'm old enough to remember when we etched keys into granite cave walls underwater. Those were the days. #bitcoin was simpler before computers.

Fuck are real people still taking Covid jabs? No words for these morons.

No one is trying to "take down" anyone. If you are in the business of putting out press releases claiming x capital deployed into projects then it's only natural that the market will seek to verify that.

I would understand if 50% of that capital couldn't be disclosed due to founders yet to come to market and therefor commercial in confidence is critical.

But 100% of 2023 investments have no known publicly announced associations?

Anyway let's hope Swan have some nice public announcements to come to improve transparency.

For the record I like Swan and the people there and I also have a lot of respect for Odell.

Imagine coming up with a brilliant idea on how we can better do weather guttering in a home build and then proceeding to demand a redesign of the concrete footings as part of your innovative approach to guttering.

The idea that you can trade fiat paper money for the hardest currency in existence #bitcoin is wild.

I can't wait to tell my grandkids, "....and then we took the worthless paper money and swapped it for bitcoin - they couldn't stop us."

If you are putting out media releases claiming to have deployed capital into the Bitcoin ecosystem but then refuse to be transparent about where those investments have landed then at best you look like a fucking moron and at worst....well...

I think Cory should operate under a principle of good faith. If you want to claim to be a key investor in the industry then show it. Otherwise if you need commercial in confidence then stop putting out media releases inviting obvious questions.

Replying to Avatar Cory 🦢 Swan

I hear Matt @odell claims people think his VC firm, Ten31, is closely tied to Swan and that some people may be influenced to use Swan or invest in Swan because of Ten31's involvement. Let me state very clearly that Ten31 has no influence on Swan, and no information rights. Ten31's biggest investment by far is in Strike, they sit on the Unchained board, and Matt and Marty's podcast is sponsored by River.

Matt was a very early advisor to Swan, specifically focused on privacy, and we very much appreciate his contributions. He owns some advisor shares in Swan, but has never been asked to invest.

Jonathan and Grant from Ten31 each cut angel checks into Swan very early on, and rolled them into their first fund. They also cut a small check into our A round from Ten31, which was a party round (lots of small checks) in Fall 2021. I don't think we ever received an investor referral from Ten31, nor do I remember ever hearing someone mention Ten31 when getting in touch about a Swan investment.

In summary, as @Odell himself said, Ten31 invested a tiny amount in Swan, long ago, and has no information rights. All large investors in Swan do extensive diligence, and they are not concerned with the names of seed funds from early rounds.

Regarding Swan's small hedge fund that we created for a couple of our institutional investors, which seems to have triggered the latest outburst from Mr. Odell:

We needed a head of trading for institutional clients to execute trades with VWAP / TWAP etc and tight spreads from multiple OTC desks. He happened to have a great track record of asset management, and a strong desire to continue managing money. A couple of our investors wanted a lower-vol Bitcoin strategy (sit in cash during drawdowns, ok with losing a little upside by missing part of some pumps), and decided to seed him in a Swan-managed fund. The fund is already at capacity and we are not marketing it.

My advice to retail investors remains the same as it's always been: DON'T TRADE UNLESS YOU WERE ALREADY A PROFESSIONAL TRADER. 99% get rekt, and it's even worse in "crypto" because that game is rigged even worse than tradfi. Much better to stay humble and stack sats, ideally with a Bitcoin-only company like Swan (we don't even have a sell button! and we have still have FREE automatic withdrawals).

I don't think this answers any questions about funds deployed.

nostr:npub1ahxjq4v0zlvexf7cg8j9stumqp3nrtzqzzqxa7szpmcdgqrcumdq0h5ech The whole purpose of you being in the #bitcoin space as a top notch journo is to do the interviews that need doing. To keep a real finger on the pulse.

What is happening at Swan? Do their numbers add up? Why no transparent disclosures on VC funds deployed?

How can we setup a business model where you aren't tied to funding from the very companies we the plebs want you doing the tough interviews with? nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx

I'm not suggesting Swan will rug tomorrow or anytime but there are legitimate questions and we need a pro journo to sort it out and be straight with the plebs.

The frustrating part of the podcast scene is there are very few people not in the pocket of the industry itself. Who is left to keep everything real?

I'm more interested in increased adoption than a small cohort increasing their network dominance. Bull runs play an important roll long term. Good to see new folks entering the fray.

Are you recklessly and irresponsibly long?

I'm here to unfollow all of you who didn't support the truckers. First question I ask any Canuck these days and it's a deal breaker.