The Earth is an energy conversion and recycling machine. Plants rearrange soil, water, and sunlight into leaves, fruit, and wood. Animals tear each other apart to rearrange flesh into new flesh. The planet constantly transforms matter from one form to another, molecule by molecule, and converts energy from one state to the next. What it cannot rearrange by itself, it accomplishes through living creatures: bees make honey, silkworms spin silk, oysters form pearls, and humans produce plastic.

Politics exists because groups of parasitic collectivists demand what they have not earned. It makes no difference who you vote for... so long as you expect to gain at someone else’s expense, you remain a parasite.

Jordan Peterson’s ideas help a lot of people, but he’s not for me. I’m more interested in questioning systems, not adapting to them. His focus on discipline and tradition feels more like maintaining the status quo than challenging it.

Christianity, Judaism, and similar religions are branches of the same sick tree... a tree rooted in resentment, guilt, moral inversion, repression, obedience, afterlife fantasies, and hatred for the strong, joyful, and instinctual.

They glorify weakness, humility, suffering, and submission... not life, but escape from it.

I don’t like Peterson. He teaches the nobility of suffering, obedience to order, and submission to tradition... like a modern-day ascetic priest, dressed in Jungian symbolism and drunk on scientism.

He speaks endlessly, but says very little.

Yes, I’ll leave you with this. You might find it interesting:

The idea of free will was born out of religious necessity. Early religious institutions needed a framework to justify moral responsibility, sin, and punishment.

If people were truly free to choose good or evil, then it made sense to blame, punish, and condemn those who disobeyed divine law.

Without free will, hell makes no sense... how do you punish someone for doing what they were always going to do?

So the doctrine of free will became a tool of control:

- It made people feel guilty for natural desires.

- It justified obedience and submission.

- It gave priests and rulers moral high ground.

Even after the fall of religion, this belief lingered in secular culture because it flatters the ego. It says: “You are in control. You are responsible. You are the captain of your soul.” It feels empowering... but it’s a myth inherited from a religious system built to exploit guilt.

Not necessarily.

Conformity and nonconformity are both driven by instinct... just different instincts.

For some, safety and belonging dominate. For others, truth, rebellion, or distrust of authority take over.

One person fears exclusion, another fears submission. Both responses are conditioned. Neither requires free will.

Nonconformity feels like a choice... but it’s often just the result of different wiring, different wounds, different causes.

The desire to break from the crowd isn’t proof of freedom... it’s proof that your internal compass points somewhere else, and you didn’t install that compass yourself.

You’re assuming rebellion = freedom. But even rebellion has its roots.

Some are conditioned to obey. Others are conditioned to question.

The drive to stand apart, to stack sats, to seek truth anonymously... it too has causes: temperament, upbringing, trauma, books, chance, even brain chemistry.

You didn’t choose your nature. You didn’t choose your environment.

You didn’t choose to become the kind of person who questions.

The urge to break free is just another instinct.

So yes, I go against the herd. But not because I’m “free.” My behavior and thinking were shaped by childhood trauma caused by religion, control and narcissism.

People like Larken Rose, Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, Martin Butler, and others shaped my path.

I didn’t choose that path freely. I was thrown onto it.

If free will were real, we’d expect wild, unpredictable divergence.

But what do we see?

Masses behaving the same, generation after generation... voting for the same hollow promises, defending the same dying systems, living the same scripts and calling it tradition.

They don’t choose freely... they inherit patterns. They mimic, conform, repeat and call it culture.

A few break the mold, yes... but not because they are “free.” Even rebellion has its causes.

So ironically, the sameness of the crowd is not proof against determinism... it’s evidence for it.

When you say you’re choosing, you’re simply enacting the result of countless prior causes... your biology, your environment, your past experiences, your chemistry. You are not the captain of the ship... you are merely a passenger on the voyage. You think you’ve acted against instinct? You’ve only obeyed a deeper one.

And worst of all?

We don’t even have free will.

What we call “choice” is just instinct in disguise.

The fact that humans now kill each other more than nature kills us directly doesn’t prove we’ve escaped it.

It proves that nature now uses us to do its killing.

Nature still rules us... from within.

We haven’t escaped the law of the jungle.

We’ve just moved the jungle inside the city walls.

As Werner Herzog said, “nature is a harmony of overwhelming and collective murder.”

And we are part of that symphony. Human violence is not a failure of nature, but a function of it... nature doesn’t care who dies, only that something dies.

https://youtu.be/zLZYW9bF50A

We haven’t conquered nature... it still pulls every string.

We eat, we fight, we procreate, we age, we die... just like any animal.

We still obey hunger, sex, fear, and death.

A heatwave kills thousands. A tremor topples buildings.

A flood submerges cities. A drought starves millions.

A hurricane flattens coastal towns.

And no matter how rich, powerful, or intelligent... we all rot, wrinkle, and die.

We are not a kingdom within a kingdom.

We are not above nature... we are of it, ruled by it, and returned to it.

Nature rules us by instinct...

from within, and through every breath, hunger, wound, and urge.

No, that's one of modern man’s most arrogant and delusional beliefs.

Correct. Only free spirits exist... for now.

They are the questioners, the doubters, the ones who step outside the herd.

But the Übermensch, the one who creates new values rather than merely rejecting old ones... he has not yet arrived.

Yes, many of our values passed through religion... but that doesn’t mean they belong to it. I don't deny the past, I just refuse to be owned by it.

You're right if you want people to defend Bitcoin’s 21M cap for centuries, you need more than math... you need myth.

The problem is if future Bitcoiners defend the cap not because they understand it, but because it’s sacred, we haven’t evolved... we’ve replaced one priesthood with another.

Well said. Like house cats, they’re not truly domesticated by force, but by comfort.

They could stand on their own, but they prefer the warmth of the cage.

Yes, most people are not strong enough to create their own values. They lack the inner strength, independence, and creative spirit needed to face the abyss of existence without inherited beliefs. For them, religion (and later, ideologies) provides ready-made meaning, rules, and morality. Most are incapable of bearing the burden of freedom. They need the illusion of moral certainty handed down from authority.

Yes, religion is moral outsourcing, but it’s not just outsourcing. It’s giving up responsibility for your own soul.

Instead of thinking for themselves, people hand their conscience to a higher power and say, "Tell me what’s good. Tell me what’s evil. Just don’t make me decide."

They don’t become moral... they become obedient.

And the worst part? They call this obedience virtue.

Absolutely, that's true.

Trump doesn’t have deaths yet, but he needs them to rouse the American patriotic types into war. It’s possible that a “terrorist” attack, an assault on a military base, a warship, or any other Operation Northwoods-style false flag operation could be orchestrated to garner support from the masses.