The more significant the lie, the closer all other details will be to the truth.
I'm not saying that if we
1. eat (right)
2. sleep (right)
3. exercise and
4. keep toxic shit out of our bodies
We'll magically turn into the people we want to become. However....it'll be extremely obvious rather quickly who or what doesn't care if, or doesn't want that to happen.
Proving Government isn't, can't or won't over-reach is impossible. Henceforth the value of zero-trust technology.
Like Guns, Bitcoin and Nostr.
It's not your fault that so many other people have used this framework to perform relationship diagnostics fraud.
Essentiall, the model breaks as soon as either or both parties decide they're not going to use it honestly. And because its implicietly egalitarian, it is more predisposed to intentional abuse than other models.
Every model can be broken. Some are just more fragile than others. This is the "counting calories" of relationship models. Red Pill stuff is the "counting macros" of models.
Yeah, this isn't the issue. (It's not a coincidence that your wife says the same thing most women do btw)
The issue is that "Love Languages" are about emotions and get trotted out primarily as post hoc rationalizations for a woman being dissatisfied with her man. A woman can just move the goalposts AND when a guy says his love language is physcial touch, lambast him for being shallow. Guys who fall into the trap of thinking this can EVER solve the core issue are "beta cuck simps." Hence the OP.
I have been beating this Dead Horse for years...
🔑🗝 = 🧀
No more enger drinks or Spark. Making my own from now on.
Sea Salt, Creatine and Guarana (caffeine).
Cement. None of that hybrid plastic scissor folding crap.
I have spent way too much time digging around those.
...and life without any retrospective critical thought would have only prejudice. Prejudice is like the axe that fells the tree which can be made into something useful. But no one ever makes a particularly beautiful chair with just an axe.
I couldn't help trolling you just a bit. White Knight and all that.....you didnt really think it through. Which is fine.
Men, by and large, can remove feelings from (online) debates much better than women can. Which means I can troll you and still put thought into my response, give you a hard time and still give you the benefit of answering each part of your comment in a way that further elaborates my position and (hopefully) creates an interesting dialog.
And that's the point. We can be much more aggressive and straightforward with each other having NEVER met or talked before than ANY two random women and zero feelings are hurt. Social media, when it is beneficial, is only beneficial for men.
Ugly single women: Sounds like you're over-fitting my logic. IRL everyone can add value. I was talking about social media specifically. (You do seem concerned with the welfare of all the ugly single women sir. God bless you for your service as a white knight.)
The point of men online? Name reasons it's good to read books and why it's helpful when they include illustrations, charts and graphs. Oh and memes. Memetics.
If women want to build each other up: Great! Love it! Ideally this would be a female-only space though as you yourself infer and doesn't allow/require male followers and engagement to accomplish a healthy purpose (Something a paid NOSTR Relay would be perfect for btw).
A woman's value proposition (as a woman) is exclusivley in either her intrinsic beauty or the way she cultivates her home.
Men should never get access to either from a woman who's married, other women will (usually) only judge it and men who show interest exclusively in the former are lying about it.
Single women can't produce the latter and therefore the interest of single men can only be based on her physical appearance....at which point, just use Tinder or better-yet, date IRL.
I rest my case.
Hot take: Social media is bad for good women
#grownostr I guess? #redpill #masculinity #family