No it does . You can use side swap to handle the peg in/peg out.
Non BTC monetary transaction
There should be an added cost for non transactions on the blockchain. It should be actively discouraged
Lightning channels can be run over liquid. Just found this post on twitter https://twitter.com/jurbed/status/1736722608584876101?t=6Rh_MoxL9dsc4-DH2VqkZA&s=19
Hosted channels make this possible. It is interesting the amount of things I've learnt in such a small amount of time since this ordinals debacle
Lightning channels can be run over liquid. Just found this post on twitter https://twitter.com/jurbed/status/1736722608584876101?t=6Rh_MoxL9dsc4-DH2VqkZA&s=19
You can't blame them when it is becoming more expensive to withdraw onchaiin. Te exchange might not support l2 options yet
I have begun learning rust as a result.
They are basically money printers at this stage
It might not be sustainable for degens but it is sustainable for state entities as a DOS attack.
Exactly which is why I laugh at the non custodial lightning faction. Even they can't justify the custodial lightning usage now for most people.
The current best tradeoff for most people right now is custodial lightning with liquid combined. The tradeoffs is there but not as a result of high fees which most people have would make .
Tell this to the global south daily experience.
Im beginning to think it isn't just degens. This is a denial of service attack.
I'm getting the feeling the word censor in #bitcoin is loosing its meaning everyday. Everyone throwing the word around lately.
IMO, thinking about censorship is when the majority chooses to prevent or allow a specific action/activity. The keyword is the majority.
My take on this is simple. An individual pool can choose the kinds of transactions to accept as long as the transactions are not a majority of what pools already reject.
A majority of the pools ideally should not prevent a specific kind of transaction. That would as censorship in my book.
Disabling notifications is such a cheat code. If I'm interested in an app e.g WhatsApp, Twitter, it isn't because of a notification. It is because I am interested at that point in time
Vscode with remote extensions enabled. The remote extensions makes all the difference.
Just a couple of thoughts, because fuck you. The tradeoffs between custodial and self-custodial bitcoin are nothing new. A certain amount of concern over nostr:npub1hcwcj72tlyk7thtyc8nq763vwrq5p2avnyeyrrlwxrzuvdl7j3usj4h9rq ‘s decision to leave the US is understandable, and certainly US users would be wise to remove their funds asap and find alternatives. I’d even go so far as to say users everywhere should take this all as a clear reminder of what could happen when using custodial services, and evaluate the level of risk they’re taking with their sats. But there are a lot of people on here who clearly want very badly for WoS to be an evil villain, and are willing to twist definitions and circumstances in order to turn this situation into that. It only hurts your argument and your reputation to exaggerate the facts of the situation to the extent some have. WoS decision was a shock, and the timing sucked, but beyond recognizing that all anyone is doing is speculating. Custodians are clearly a risk. Use them only when necessary. But self-custodial lightning is not always the answer, and it certainly isn’t easy enough for just anyone to do. Understand the risks in your setup and choice of wallets, and proceed accordingly. And never stop learning and orange pilling others. 💜🤙
I thought I was the only one going insane about the dishonesty all over the place.
Just catching up on the Wallet of Satoshi updates. Don’t keep any meaningful amount of #bitcoin in it but any suggestions on wallets that work well with nostr:npub18m76awca3y37hkvuneavuw6pjj4525fw90necxmadrvjg0sdy6qsngq955 ? / recommend transition from WoS to another wallet? I’m in the US. Thanks!
Combination of liquid wallet like green with lightning atomic swap providers like boltzhq.
I think a liquid wallet with atomic swap support to lightning is the better compromise for current custodial lightning options in a high fee environment. The tradeoffs with liquid multisig custodian approach is a worry but this is only a concern when looking to swap to #btc. Lightning swap services are god send.
If muun wallet supported liquid swaps with lightning, it solves the pain point of using the wallet day to day in a high fee environment.
I don't get the complaint about free #lightning sat spam. I mean it's free sats. Turn off notifications on the app and u are good.