f7
nobody
f7168a3d9d34ac7be9cddd1edf021441cd9a0a56e0bb13a88d00384cf288c441
account deleted

I understand that you are thinking of it that way. You are wrong. Socialism is not the thing you are talking about. Your comparison ignores fundamental differences in worldview, scale, structure, and purpose, making it an inconsistent and oversimplified analogy. I can decide that Muslim patriarchy is equally family-friendly with enough exceptions. Doesn't mean I'm right.

You should have dinner with some 60-year-olds from Eastern Europe sometime.

Gee thanks. Nice to be recognised once in a while.

Quite annoyed by the new keyboard selection UI in #grapheneOS. Who had the bright idea to add titles and all this empty space? I just need a list of boards. I really don't want to scroll.

Replying to Avatar BankSith

Back up your #Bitcoin 🧡

The nostr:npub1r8343wqpra05l3jnc4jud4xz7vlnyeslf7gfsty7ahpf92rhfmpsmqwym8 Safe enables the recovery seeds of Bitcoin to be independently and permanently secured in extremely resistant stainless steel.

🔐 5% off for Seedor bitcoin safe:

https://www.seedor.io/en/discount/BANKSITH

#nostr 💜 https://video.nostr.build/aa551dfb233897b16b26c30e9aafa6f90968140ff6f419b52285eb142a719b47.mp4

I will now go wash my eyes with soap.

I don't think that's a rule. Never heard it before anyways.

Making the banks smooth and even can't be beat. Efficiency of movement. An excuse to exercise. No snowblower fumes🤝

Replying to nobody

Hmmmmm he says

"Good example of why I like X:

https://x.com/sundarpichai/status/1866179423000748069?s=52&t=fuJZ_ZgEP7uCWY8P4pDQBA

CEO of Google and Elon interacting

I hear directly from people I trust (Ron Paul, Thomas Massie)

In one minute I get a good feel for who the United CEO shooter was with minimal commentary."

nostr:note1masynkvry06u0vfgaux2hdkr64rzhzs8hgxvqxm6m4m3rgnrxy5s330qm2

thank you #sora

Hey humans! To detect AIGI look at edges!

Replying to Avatar Peter Todd

“I see a lot of confusion about Google's Monday press release about quantum supremacy, so let me try to clarify a few things.

They say they did a computation on a ca 100 qubit chip much faster than a conventional (super)computer could do. The particular calculation in question is to produce a random distribution. The result of this calculation has no practical use.

They use this particular problem because it has been formally proven (with some technical caveats) that the calculation is difficult to do on a conventional computer (because it uses a lot of entanglement). That also allows them to say things like "this would have taken a septillion years on a conventional computer" etc.

It's exactly the same calculation that they did in 2019 on a ca 50 qubit chip. In case you didn't follow that, Google's 2019 quantum supremacy claim was questioned by IBM pretty much as soon as the claim was made and a few years later a group said they did it on a conventional computer in a similar time.

So while the announcement is super impressive from a scientific pov and all, the consequences for everyday life are zero. Estimates say that we will need about 1 million qubits for practically useful applications and we're still about 1 million qubits away from that.

Also, it's been a recurring story that we have seen numerous times in the past years, that claims of quantum "utility" or quantum "advantage" or quantum "supremacy" or whatever you want to call it later evaporate because some other group finds a clever way to do it on a conventional computer after all.”

https://x.com/skdh/status/1866352680899104960

A lot of folks have no idea what any of this means.

Before anyone gets too depressed, quantum theory is used in many practical real world applications, and quantum tech while more niche does exist.

Quantum computing is a different thing altogether. Words matter.

These are being used today:

https://www.aerospacetestinginternational.com/features/how-quantum-sensors-will-unlock-aviations-potential.html