USA 🇺🇸: Actor Leonardo DiCaprio has endorsed Kamala Harris for U.S. President, citing climate issues as the reason for his choice.

“Donald Trump continues to deny the facts. He continues to deny science. He withdrew the United States from the Paris Climate Accords and revoked critical environmental protections,” said DiCaprio.

He added, “Climate change is killing the Earth and ruining our economy. We need a bold step to save our economy, our planet, and ourselves. That’s why I’m voting for Kamala Harris.”

BREAKING: Chinese Stocks just saw their biggest weekly outflow in more than 9 years.

“Inflation is a hidden tax punishing savers in order to bail out debtors.

Biggest debtor: governments.

Fiat suffer from the moral hazard of easy debt issuance, that can later be erased through debasement at the expense of the savers.”

-Andreas Antonopoulos

Only winning move is to save in a money outside their system.

GM. Turning 40 today wtf ☠️

Reminds me of Alex Webb for some reason. Very nice

Hello Jeff,

Here are my 2 sats. I believe Bitcoiners should move away from the idea that, under a BTC standard, prices need to be denominated in sats. Instead, we should consider denominating prices in hashes.

Reasoning: A product's price in sats can fall for two reasons:

1. The product can be produced more efficiently, meaning less energy is needed to create one unit.

2.Humanity has access to more usable energy in general.

When it comes to product pricing, the effect of point 2 should ideally be eliminated, and price signals should come only from the first point. However, if humanity has access to more energy, the ratio of SHA256 hashes per BTC will continuously increase, and through the timechain, it is also the only market price that can be validated by every node, on the relationship between block rewards and difficulty.

Since hashes are ultimately equivalent to energy, product prices denominated in hashes would likely converge toward an optimum, rather than falling indefinitely.

Is it possible to determine the value of one side of a bitcoin transaction without using fiat as a reference in that moment? Ex. If someone says I’ll sell you this house for 10 BTC, isn’t the only way to determine if it’s a good trade is by mentally converting the 10 BTC to fiat and then comparing it to the market rate for similar houses?

They are right. Except the "we" is not all humans, it's just all people abusing there power in finance and governments. Everyone else will be fine and will probably live a better life.

📸 100 SATS FOR YOUR BEST OUTDOOR/NATURE PHOTO 🖼

Looking to zap AT LEAST 100 people in the next 24 hours

GM and happy Monday #nostr 😊

Let's pursue those damn dreams 😁

Fact: The probability of you and I being born is extremely low!

For this miracle to happen, all the generations before us had to do their best, surviving long enough and ensuring descendants. In their quest for survival, they had to overcome an incredible number of life-and-death situations. Against all odds, they made it, and the proof of their success is you and me!

If we gain awareness of this fact, we might discover the tremendous significance and how precious "to be alive" really is!

#Gm my people ✌️

That's only if you need to make a bid every time which you wouldn't. This is automated so you'd also likely never have to make most bids. You're only going to algorithmicly do it at last second if the pot is about to clear and you're not the winner. Helps even more if you're the site owner and you're just rugging everyone else so you know even more about bidders and pot conditions.

1.5 million sat pot over at lastpaywins.com