Avatar
Hynek
f88e6629b320c83b559075b084d14c00043e01dc206918782ce40d54e5254dd5

The more you know about fiat, the less you want to have it.

With Bitcoin, it's the opposite.

For example, consolidations that aren’t worth doing when fees are high… It’s a matter of supply and demand. And if fees are, say, at least 100 sat/vB, a lot of transactions simply won’t happen. Some people won’t even consider using on-chain in that kind of situation. On the other hand, if transactions were theoretically still possible at, say, 0.01 sat/vB, it would be accessible to many more people. Fees would only converge toward zero in a scenario of low demand combined with very low time preference.

Maybe. But it could also lead to more transactions and enable some additional use cases. It's all about incentives, and miners are gradually starting to realize that getting a little is better than getting nothing. At the same time, it improves predictability. People feel less need to reach out to miners directly, and instead, we're returning to a more transparent mempool. So, I see it as not only inevitable, but mostly positive.

What do you mean? For example nostr:npub18d4r6wanxkyrdfjdrjqzj2ukua5cas669ew2g5w7lf4a8te7awzqey6lt3 is showing these close to zero fee rates finally and two 3 significant digits. Which I believe is desired.

We're improving fee rate predictions in Trezor Suite:

- More frequent data refresh

- Precision to two decimal places

- Soon, you'll be able to make transactions below 1 sat/vB

Dollar has reached another all time low (ATL) and it keeps falling.

Some people are still willing to give you 855 sat for 1 USD 🤷

A person is young as long as they have their parents.

Is there some private electricity provider accepting bitcoin? The state version obviously doesn’t work 🫠

Let’s imagine we’re living 30 years ago and going around trying to explain to people how email will change the world. Who would even care? We could even tell them how to set it up, but that would be pointless too. However, if during collaboration we mention that we’ll send the info via email and act like they’re Neanderthals for not knowing what it is… maybe after a few iterations, they’ll start getting interested. I remember many companies trying to figure out how to make a website—just so they wouldn’t fall completely behind.

We should approach bitcoin adoption the same way. Don’t explain anything—just require bitcoin for collaboration.

I don’t like the concept of tipping. But it’s quite a good opportunity to onboard someone into bitcoin.

Don’t want bitcoin? Then no worries. But here, I’m offering you a voucher for bitcoin… you can check it out at home in peace, or I can help you with it next time.

Replying to Avatar calle

Everytime I zap someone vie Lightning from my wallet, it takes 5-10 seconds for the zap to settle and for everyone to see it happen on nostr.

Everytime, I think "this could've been an instant nutzap". "Tap, boom. Tap, boom. Zap zap zap. I would be zapping so much more."

The reason a nutzap is instant is obvious. At this point, I hope that everyone knows that a Cashu nutzap is just an instant transfer of an IOU from one user to another.

Let's step back and look at a pure Lightning zap on nostr for a second. We all know that the vast majority of Lightning zaps is effectively an exchange of one custodial IOU against another one as well. Most people use custodial wallets. So why is it still so slow? It's the Lightning settlement between the two custodians that often takes 5-10s to complete. Note, some users actually do run their own node, manage channels, run LNURL servers, etc. But they still get the same UX.

Here is an idea. Let's say a user doesn't want to use Cashu. Pure Lighting maxi which I think is great. I've been a Lightning dev for years before I started working on Cashu. This user could still be nutzapped and even remain fully self-sovereign if they run their own node.

What if the receiving user's Lightning wallet (custodial or non-custodial) was able to melt all nutzaps it receives by watching the nostr wallet ("nutsack") of its user? Either for every nutzap or whenever enough nuts are accumulated, the service could withdraw the nuts to the user's real Lightning wallet.

Effectively, this would improve the zap UX by showing everyone an instant zaps. The receiving user's custodian (or themselves) would have to run something like a nostr-cashu-wallet-watcher on a server to receive while being offline, but they have to run a Lightning node and LNURL and all that anyway (they already have a server).

Even without a server, normal nostr clients without true nutzap support could withdraw all nuts accumulated while they were offline back to their Lightning wallet everytime they come back online. The only real difference to a normal zap is that noe it's the receiver's job to settle via Lightning, not the zap sender's.

Nevertheless, zaps on permissionless social media like in nostr will never be completely trustless. They can't solve the sybil problem for instance. If you want, you can zap yourself an infinite amount of normal Lightning zaps on nostr without moving s single Satoshi. We faked zaps in the early days like crazy just to have fun.

But it actually turns out, all that doesn't really matter too much at all. First, people seem not to abuse the sybil issue. We had fun for a few weeks but then it got uninteresting There is not enough to gain, no algorithm to fool, no benefit of lying (at least not yet). Second, zaps are literally free money given to you from a random person. Why would someone rug you if they want to literally gift you money? It doesn't make much sense.

I think we have a lot more to learn. nostr:nprofile1qqs04xzt6ldm9qhs0ctw0t58kf4z57umjzmjg6jywu0seadwtqqc75spz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsz9mhwden5te0wfjkccte9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9wshszxnhwden5te0wpuhyctdd9jzuenfv96x5ctx9e3k7mf0dv4ph5 recently said he thinks we have explored 1% of what zaps can be. He might be right. I think the reordering of events that a bearer zap system like with Cashu brings could open new doors for insane UX and it looks like we're actually going to find out. We have zero-config wallets now. Imagine how cool it is to bring your money wherever you go with your nsec.

Keep exploring, cypherpunks. We do live in the best of all times. Bullish on Bitcoin, bullish on Nostr, bullish on Cashu 🧡

Yes. It makes a lot of sense to detach payment and settlement.

And cashu seems to be natural payment protocol. It will became the default.

Cashu is for peanuts…

This nostr:note12j02uvy3nzy872s2uc6299hal90eeat9jac2u6cljr660nqwe6rqz7ftw2

It is legit. Developed by SatoshiLabs - just like Trezor for example.

I'm not aware of a specific plan at Trezor.

But my personal plan is to explore the possibilities of verified contacts, forwardingverifiedonchain addresses via nostrrr and then building a p2p network:

nostr:note174qkw0ujwx3z8867sceg8fd7h9kf0w7j8te6a4a6qd76sap0gksqf7d5y4

Basic nostr integration was merged to Trezor firmware - in debug mode so far.

https://github.com/trezor/trezor-firmware/pull/4436

Speculating on the price of bitcoin is a distraction. If you're not willing to go all in, it's hardly worth it. The most common advice is #DCA, but I recommend going all-in with #GetOnZero.

If you have an income that covers your needs and you believe bitcoin is better than fiat, then keep everything in bitcoin and stop worrying about nonsense.

I've been doing this for several years, and it's incredibly liberating. It also comes with many other benefits, such as:

- You’ll learn to use bitcoin more effectively

- You’ll always prefer paying with it

- You'll start building a network of bitcoiners around you - especially within your family.

- You'll be able to help people because, with your established network, you can - for example, send something to your mom, knowing you have several other people to replenish your bitcoin supply.

This article is really amazing and fascinating.

https://waitbutwhy.com/2016/03/cryonics.html

One of the reasons why we should hurry with the bitcoin adoption, so we can use the energy to other topics later on.