Had been away from my phone to long and missed that #[3] put us all to work bringing down github.
Would the goal be a GitHub like experience but decentralized?
iPhone owners have no recourse when this happens. Shows the importance having control of the computers in your life.
#[0]
203 sats, I'll survive the rug pull š
I did indeed! ā”
With only paid relays enabled for global I get some value from mine. There is definitely more room for curation innovation regardless.
Invite only relays is another interesting idea I forgot about.
Sooner or later the spammers will come into every comment section. I see no other solution tight now other than paid relays. Makes removing spammers a viable business model.
Could not help myself, started to build a nostr relay for fun. Any recommendations for good BIP340 (Schnorr signatures) golang packages?
A quick Google brings up btcec, will try that out š¤·
But answering the steelman version of the question. Yes, I saw a thread about black holes and event horizons a while back. But I am confident It drifted into BTC and nostr eventually š¤·
Would expand to bitcoin OR nostr itself...
Exited by the thought of specialized relays that presents a unique feed, clients that allow you have multiple feeds where you can mix and match relays.
Would be really cool to present it as a regular relay that you can enable alone or with other relays as global feed.
How are decisions about the code base structure and beat practices made?
Today itās āFastelavnā in Scandinavia and we celebrating with buns š“š
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fastelavn
Is it raspberry jam in there? š® I applaud the sight of a Semla on here, but appauled by the way it is defiled! This must be the work of a Dane?
Twitter probably have some super complicated algorithm for this. Maybe a start is to just collapse boost next to each other in the feed?
#[0] I love #[1] as much as the next guy. But I think we need to do something better when everybody boosts something.
Why should a person who discovered some information ever lose their copyright on that information?
Because it produce better societal outcomes if they do.
If you spend 20 years of your life to discover some piece of information that creates real change in the world, why should the benefit of your blood, sweat and tears be limited in time?
(This is based on my morals so your milage may vary)
The economy exist to produce goods (including information) for consumers. The only consideration when constructing incentives is optimizing for the consumers.
And how long should the copyright last?
Just long enough so that the value of produced information covers the cost of production and a risk adjusted profit.
This is highly sector specific and might change over time.
One thing to note is that given constant revenue from the information, doubling the copyright does not actually double the vale of the information as future cashflows are discounted with the risk free rate. The societal cost of not having that information free double.
Charging for information is acceptable as it will lead to more and better information. Good journalism cost money, and incentives matter.
Copyright should be very short lived though.
Out of band payments does not really change the incentives of the miners. Wastefull blockspace usage will sooner or later be outcompeted by truely valuable use regardless of market structure.