You sound like a cult member not a freedom maximalist.
Discussion
Your side wants to turn Bitcoin into Bitcoin SV.
My side? Again I’m not in a cult. I don’t have a side. I do recognize that you will never stop spam, and that filters create more issues than they solve and push spam into worse areas of the system.
You are also ignoring over a decade of cyberpunk knowledge around open decentralized protocols and how the legal system deals with them. As soon as you create a system where node operators can absolutely control what makes it onto the network the expectation by the state will be that you will comply with their demands. You tread a dangerous path on your righteous crusade.
Compromised Core devs deliberately allowed inscription spam, retard.
You’re like a child who wanders into the middle of a movie and demands to know what’s going on.
I know what is going on. You are telling lies and trying to manipulate people. As you can see I give the direct evidence.
Not sure if you are a retard who is brainwashed by compromised Core devs' propaganda or you are a bad actor too ....
It seems like you have no idea what any of this is about. Cultist conspiracy bro following a deranged statist lunatic.
I guess you are more retard than a bad actor.
You need to study Bitcoin more and inform yourself how compromised Core devs allowed inscription spam and then used this "argument that spam already exist or spam can not be stopped" to push more spam via OP_RETRUN
I guess you prefer more centralized mining.
You are fighting against the fundamental mechanics of how the network operates. Of people value a transaction they will pay for it and nothing your node does will stop this.
This is the nature of a censorship resistant network powered by greed and self interest.
More retarded propaganda and nonsense from you? I am not surprised.
1. Filters work. That is why MARA stopped mining transactions with 0.1sat/vB fees.
2. Ocean is fixing centralized mining with DATUM - Decentralized Alternative Templates for Universal Mining
"DATUM was born out of a need to restore Bitcoin mining to its decentralized roots—a time when miners truly embodied the role of building the blockchain by constructing block templates and submitting them to the network."
1. You don’t understand incentives. Not mining low cost transactions has nothing to do with mining higher fee “spam”.
2. Datum won’t solve for miners who specifically choose to mine spam because they want to make more money. All datum does is make sure miners have better control over what they include in their blocks regardless of what the pool would want. A pool of miners who want to mine garbage for the money will outcompete all other miners. Your solution just accelerates the issue.
1. Hard for you to read? I am not surprised.
"Fees + filters are better than just fees."
2. See again what Mara did. Nodes secure Bitcoin, their mempool policies and their consensus.
Nodes are run by individuals and the node mempool policy of the majority cannot stop a minority from mining a valid transaction. This is the fundamental nature of a censorship resistant network.
We will filter spam and csam with Bitcoin Knots as much as we can to keep Bitcoin Freedom Money and we won't care about retards, bad actors or their wrong points of view. Your theory will be put to the test 🤙 And we know there always will be bad actors. But Bitcoin is designed to incentivize good actors.
Bitcoin is designed to incentivize self interest. I would generally agree that bitcoin creates environments for long term thinking, the competitive low margin nature of mining will continuously create environments for immediate profit motives to outweigh the long term health of the chain.
It’s a free network. So run the node you want, just remember that freedom cuts both ways.
Your rhetorical style besides being childish and cultish, is so dripping with self righteous fervor that I think it will be a net negative for Bitcoin regardless of how these node wars ultimately turn out.
Somebody put the word "cult" in your brain and you repeat it like a complete retard.
>freedom cuts both ways
You tried to say something?
As node runners we intend to preserve Bitcoin's primary usecase (money, not JPGs, not "data").
The current spam is obfuscated and fragmented (and Core is responsible for much of it by REFUSING to fix Inscriptions exploit bug).
100k OP_RETURN will allow for high fidelity CSAM images in an inmutable blockchain. We did not sign up for that crap, so forgive me if we are playing defense here by trying to preserve Bitcoin.
Watching bitcoiners invoke the states arguments against encryption during this debate is mind boggling. This virtue signally doesn’t work on most of us, why are you mugging for the normies cameras?
He didn’t offer a bug fix. He offered filtering. As we all know filtering won’t stop the inscriptions because it will only take a single pool to mine these transactions regardless of the filters. If you succeed in stopping all the pools one will emerge that will have a revenue stream that no others will and will pull in ever more hash rate as profit seeking is what underpins the entire bitcoin network. This is highly centralizing and far worse for bitcoin than some data you don’t like.