I am just saying there is no verifiable evidence to confirm the claim of splitting the atom (nuclear fission) exists.
Discussion
What about the mass of the uranium changing? And the difference in spectrometry?
Donβt waste your time with foolish. It makes you more the fool. Just mute the dumb fuck and move on with your life. Theyβre clearly baiting.
It's more "trust me bro" science.
Apart from the energy released causing the water to boil, and the carbon rods and water flow needed to absorb said energy to stop it all melting down lol.
There should be plenty of video and photographic evidence of said process then?
A video of atoms splitting?
The fact you are even asking for that blows my mind. An atom splits so fast, and they are so small, there is no 'camera' on the planet that can film it lol.
It is also slightly concerning that you somehow imagine this is a 'gotcha' for nuclear physicists.
There was advanced math to predict the process and expectations. Years later the process was enacted, and measurements taken.
You really need to spend less time listening to retards - for your own sake.
Splitting atoms is the claim isn't it?
I'm talking actual reality here, not theory or fantasy.
If they can't see it, then how can they claim it's being split? Lies and deciet is what's going on here. You are either a willfully ignorant member of the cult or you are at it.
You sophistry doesn't work here.
You cannot film it. JFC, do you even comprehend what splitting an atom means?
Think about how small an atom actually is. Think about how fast it splits. You think an iPhone or something could film that? π π π π
You predict the outputs, then measure, and there you have the proof.
"Dur, I want to see it happen on my Samsung or it isn't troof"
Dude, the very fact there are nuclear power stations should be enough for you to start wondering what you are missing. But no. You have to lean into the retard zone.
Congrats. You are a numpty.
There is a niche-popular book out there claiming nuclear weapons are fake (not nuclear reactors/power, the author cedes that these work). Was just in a thread I replied to this morning. Maybe Path is referring to this. I have no opinion about book for now, as I haven't read much of it, but it's an interesting premise
I can assure you first hand nuclear weapons are very real. I guess the book is a work of fiction.
Yeah, I'm not prepared to dismiss them from skimming a few pages of a random book, don't worry. Just it's only "evidence" I've been shown when this topic comes up. Debating spending more time reading it...might be a waste of time, might be entertaining...
Good copy. Being open minded and well read is never a waste of time. Just stay grounded in facts and verify.
I've been to ground zero in Hiroshima and Chernobyl and can assure you, nuclear power isn't real.
The concept of nuclear fission for power stations is the same as for weapons.
It is only how enriched the material is that matters in that respect. ( From memory )
ergo, the only way the premise makes any sort of sense is to claim we cannot enrich the radioactive material enough. Or perhaps an inability to detonate?
That's a different claim, and still wrong. We can.
The seems to be a weird trait for the human mind now, whereby if someone can't understand something, they tend toward believing it to be fake news, rather than trying to understand it.
We are so fvcked π
I welcome you to jump in thread (2-3 hours ago on my timeline, and discuss with someone who's read the book recently and pretty smart. I don't have any real understanding of how they're meant to work, and likely won't anytime soon, so can't really weigh in other than how unlikely such a massive ruse/coverup would be.
So no videos or photos of the nuclear fission in 80 years. Sounds like "trust me bro" garbage.
The claim is atom splitting πͺ. Practical demonstration or you faking it. A mathematical equation isn't reality dumbdumb.
The nuclear reactor is the demonstration, you bone head π π π π
Where do you think the power generation comes from if it isn't nuclear fission?
You think there are hamsters in there running a treadmill or something? π€£
I'm asking for verification - can you provide it?
A practical demonstration should be easy to do. I'm sure you have ask Chatgpt and know they can't provide any photo or video evidence π₯΄
One more time - for the slow people at the back - the nuclear reactor is the practical demonstration.....
You need me to write it again?
Provide the demonstration of it working then.
Yes. I will pop out to my garage and split an atom for you, and record it on my iPhone, right after I cut the grass.
Wait here for me.
So the whole science community hasn't provided any evidence of it? That's for agreeing.
The 'science community' provided evidence.
Then the engineers built power stations using it.
The armed forces made submarines that go uderwater for months at a time using it too.
But sure. You keep asking for the snapchat of an atom splitting, I'm going to make one for you later. I have all the kit in my garage, and my iPhone is ready to film it!
Thereβs an essential aspect to this story that doesnβt add up: nuclear power stations are supposedly everywhere, but there is no real, observable evidence of the processes and results of these reactors.
Weβre told that nuclear reactors power cities, but we donβt have images, footage, or clear, independent demonstrations of the processes involved. Where are the real-time videos or experiments? Why is the evidence so opaque?
First paragraph - there are! What exactly do you think generates the power from a nuclear reactor, if it isn't fission?
Hamsters on wheels?
Second paragraph - footage of what?
The power stations are there ffs, power comes out of them, what more "footage" do you need?
You can drive and look at one. My god, you are dumb.
The evidence isn't opaque. You are just too stupid to understand it.
There. I said the quiet bit out loud. Now go deal with it.
There is no disagreement what is generating the power - water is heated and used to generate electricity.
The claim is atoms are split which causes heat that is used to heat the water and generate electricity.
This is all clear or?
Please provide video/Fotos of the practical demonstration to prove atoms can be split.
I'm sure this has been verified many times over in the science community judging by your confidence.
As you probably already know, the original experiments were not documented and none since either.
Perhaps you can provide evidence of the assumed used materials U-235 , Pu-239 and Radium Bromide? Would that make it easier for you?
Of course, no evidence exists for them either. π β’οΈ
So what exactly do you think is happening, if fission isn't occurring?
The science provided the theory, the engineers built it based on the theory.
The evidence is the fact you recognise Plutonium exists right?
It is made as a byproduct of Uranium derived fission in a nuclear reactor ffs.
I can only assume electricity is being produced in conventional ways that have been proven and verified.
I haven't researched it, only the 3 products I mentioned to you that we're supposedly used in the "discovery" experiment. But, If there is no fission, how can there be a byproduct??
Do you think it's a red flag that there are no Fotos or videos of these items?
The scientific method demands claims and discoveries be repeatable and verifyifable by peers.
Just when I think you couldn't get any dumber, you write:
"But, If there is no fission, how can there be a byproduct??"
That's my point you numpty. In goes Uranium. Fission happens, and a byproduct that we KNOW comes out, is Plutonium.
It is so rare naturally, the logical question you should be asking yourself is "where did we get it from, if not via fission?"
I'm not even going to address "conventional means" of where the power comes from if not via fission. There is no coal in there dude, just as there are no hamsters in there.
Honestly, right now something in your brain should be telling you it may be time to recognise you dont understand something, so rather than lean on retards, perhaps the best approach would be to try and learn it?
If there is no photos of them, how do you know they exist? You are the one who is emotionally attached. Please stop projecting your biases. You haven't brought anything to the conversation, let alone any proof of your claims.
We are going in circles here, so let's call an end to it. We can agree that you have a belief in nuclear fission that deviates from objective reality and this is cult like behaviour.
I am in awe at how stupid people have become.
If there is any emotion, it is depression lol.
You can literally google a picture of Plutonium.
How does that help you?
You wouldn;t even know i what you are looking at is real - be honest.
https://cdn.nostrcheck.me/f7dd6fe2a87450cab9235f2794d52ebfd2b7824d717ae4736a808d1ca12ab7b6.mp4
https://cdn.nostrcheck.me/8c2b593f9ab767fc4de6e38912e153e7c8ebc13316a543199eef8b1903a55e83.mp4
https://cdn.nostrcheck.me/7d28872470b1a14f049e30504a3777dd74318914c12e547ddc88d5dd6718d928.mp4
https://cdn.nostrcheck.me/daaa529d7b0ef90b10c73833b15abfaa3983f4cd4e994bfb1d8573cca4bc0d36.mp4
Again, can you prove the plutonium has been produced in this process? I have already told you that there is no photographic evidence of the inputs, of the process and so why would I believe a so called "output".
Finally we are agreed upon something, people (like you) are stupid/wilfully ignorant and don't know how to think for yourself.
Let's end it here. You have nothing new to add.
Yes. There is nuclear waste. With Plutonium in it.
Where else did it come from?
This is what I am talking about - you have no idea what fission is really.
If you did, you wouldn't ask for a picture, because you would know the very concept of a picture is nonsensical.
It is like asking for a photo of gravity lol.
Gravity is an easy one - there are lots of practical experiements you can do yourself to verify the upward vector. - you know.. .science.
It's the same with nuclear fission - you can measure the output - Plutonium and heat and electricity - you just can't do it yourself!!
So you have to be able to verify it yourself personally to be classed as true?
If not, we just believe some other weird theory that *checks notes* we also cannot prove? π€£
Thats my whole point numbnuts. Whats worse is that there is literally *checks notes* nobody verifying nuclear fission. Trust me bro. Science! TM.
What do you mean nobody verifying it?
Every nuclear reactor in the world is verifying it in real time.
Just as you cannot have a photo of gravity, but jumping off a building will hammer the point home real fast.
You really are peak retard. You're so dumb, you don't even know you're dumb. It blows my mind. Truly, a spectacle to behold.
you're repeating yourself. make sure your jabs are working. are you wearing a mask right now?
And there it is. Peak retard.
Because one thing was proved to be a lie, everything you don't understand but called a lie by retards, must therefore also be a lie.
Just think that through.... If you can, ofc.
In the interim there are nuclear powered naval ships travelling the world, without as much as a sniff of refuelling. I suppose that's the solar panels on the roof, right? π
you got any decent leads on this hole?
there are plenty of debunkers of "quantum" pennistech in the tubes, but little on nuclear self-pleasuring implants...
Anybody making a claim should be able to back up their claim with a practical demonstration. There is nothing practical documented from the original "discovery" of atom splitting and look up Geiger counters for a laugh. They sell them at Chernobyl actually... Talking of which, the Babushkas there seem to be thriving.. along with the nature.
leads?
The burden of proof is on those who claim it. Real world observable evidence should be provided.
i got you bro... just looking for more arrows.
i do wonder whether the nuclear power capabilities are real, while the "exploding death object" aspect is propaganda...
The nuclear power is also a scam. They use renewables/coal/LNG to heat the Steam towers to balance the electricity load.
It is part of the fiat scam to make people think it's hard to generate electricity so they can charge money for something that is massively abundant and free flowing.
We don't even really know what electricity is. We know what it does, but what it is , not. Tesla said our whole world is electro magnetic.
Dont. It doesnβt end wellβ¦
π€£ π€£ π€£
Without interfering or getting dragged into this conversation.
Since 2023, weβve had attosecond lasers, which means we can now photograph atoms splitting.
Whether theyβve done this or not yet is another question.
Donβt shoot the messenger π
Great find. I did some short research and the devices look very interesting although nothing available to buy yet - there is an issue though - they don't photograph atoms- they provide spectroscopy images which are quite different from real Fotos produced by an electron microscope.
This would be a good start to get spectroscopy images at least to confirm the changes when atom splitting happens - I'm sure the science community is working on it π
The inventors received a Nobel prize.
We can now see the electron spin around the nucleus, which I find incredible.
Fun fact, there are more attoseconds in a second than there have been seconds in the life of the universe.
I've waited so long for more anti-science on nostr. Anti-science anti-vaxxers are clearly not enough. I have e to look into my archive. I'm sure to find a photo where the tiny atomic man splits the atoms with his atomsaw.
The whole atom theory is a big joke. We can't see atoms with an election microscope, but trust us, atoms exist and this is what they look like... LOL π and people think they aren't living in a cult.
You had me at election microscope π
Electron Microscope, it is the most powerful microscope π¬ available, but can only produce black and white photographs and protein cells are about as far as can be seen. β€οΈπͺ
What's your cult and what are the cult's models?
I was born into the globe cult, that seeks to group people together, to dishearten people and discourage people from seeking the truth. This is about objective reality, natural science and facts. This empowers people which is the opposite of what those in charge want.
"Yo, I feel you! But whatβs your take on how we break free from that mindset? π€π #StayWoke"
Try to understand the trivium, the tactics being used against you (propaganda, illogical fallacies, sophistry etc), go back to first principles for honest debates... Question everything.. verify.. don't trust...
We don't know what we are, where we are and there are characters stopping us from exploring the room.
Sorry, I'm jumping it. I've never heard this.
I get nukes are fake, that's kinda obvious in 2025
I even suspect uranium is not as dangerous as we're told.
From claims of lab accidents there's evidence that refined Uranium radiates heat and melts. Are you claiming that that is fake?
It makes rational sense that with a concentration of beta or alpha radiation You will have a build up of entropy.
It's irrational that it wouldn't be true.
It also fits with why we have Uranium tipped balistics, as anti tank weapons ( dense molten uranium with a low melting point can pierce metal armour )
The claim is atoms are being split and the heat is being used to heat water and generate electricity.
So far there hasn't been presented any practical demonstrations or photos or videos of this. Of course, because there are none. Even those who discovered nuclear fission didn't bother to record it. π β’οΈ. No one repeated their experiments and it's all just "trust me bro".
You claimed reactors were fake.
Atoms are just a model. Claiming no evidence atoms split is very different to claiming reactors are fake.
You are coming across as malicious: spread an outlandish claim to silence valid points e.g. nukes are fake and military is π
I haven't made any claims. If there are nuclear reactors, show some practical demonstrations of "the claim", nuclear fission - atoms being split.
That is the model and should be able to be practically demonstrated or an experiment shown to PROVE the claim? That's how science works in the real world.
The original experiments were conducted without any special conditions so records of them should be readily available and verified 100s of times over by now in the scientific community to gain consensus.
Fuck off b0t
