Time to cut the fluff and hit you with some questions to break that echo chamber vibe. If you're real free thinkers, these should make you pause.
As self-proclaimed decentralization pros, why should any true free thinker take you seriously when you're stuck rigid inside Bitcoin's box? Doesn't that kill decentralization if only your option of ''decentralization'' is the only one people should use?
Bitcoin's got history, sure. But how can you call every other option a scam without ever studying them properly? What if a real look exposes your blind spots or finds stuff that actually helps?
You rant about separating money from the state, but then hype government adoption like reserves. Isn't that just dragging the state right back in? How does that not contradict everything?
Be honest, Is this about pumping your bags with "number go up," or actually paving roads to freedom? Can't have both if one's undermining the other. Pick a lane.
Why idolize figures with obvious conflicts of interest who twist the truth for their gains? Ignoring that just weakens the whole thing. Care to think on it, or nah?
Why Bitcoiners don't engage in Agorist markets if that is the real way to separate the money from the state? Do you think legal businesses using bitcoin and and not P2P illegal local trade makets is the road to achive it?
#nostr
#Bitcoin
