"payment failed, this lightning address provider is not supported"

"their administrator should email compliance@lightspark.com to be added to our whitelist"

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Ironic Zeus and this dropped the same day… the two paths forward 🛣️

Wait, what, Zeus dropped?! Where have I been!

Thanks

Hilarious. They’re training Karen’s.

😂

🤢

Hahaha fuck this shit. Nobody is going to use that

And so it begins.

The closed eco-system standard?

Creepto.

nostr:note1y99vpsx28pl7kedcj2w0nlfg345vkc728hpkgus9qxsavmf2kn9qhatkal

what i don't understand is, why can't we just use the existing LNURL spec nostr:npub18m4nmc2wchzgcmzvnluqjzxyrpshp64mwje2vuz60kulny3v6c0qtgcl2x ? we're using it every day here on Nostr. it works quite well. there's no need to confuse people with a new standard.

https://xkcd.com/927/

And even less if it's "compliant"

Because this is a spec for currency and KYC, LNURL doesn’t have that

https://github.com/uma-universal-money-address/protocol

Or drop lnurl and switch to bolt12 (when we have an implementation that has it)

🥲 shitcoins on lightning are a bad idea. Change my mind.

Marcus was always a compliance cuck. Once a yuppie elite, always a yuppie elite.

David should know that open systems beat closed systems.

It's all so tiresome

Lnurl is a mess. It enables great things but it's not worth it.

🤮

Get David on the pod

Nice I hate it.

Booooo

It was the obvious next-step for LNURL.

That's why real cypherpunks already moved onto Monero. Bitcoin is infested by KYC lovers, AML appologists and compliance guys.

If you value your freedom and privacy you have a choice. Either get rid of those type of false Bitcoiners or move over to the dark side.

Take away their power!

Full government name may I add