Well, it is easy to arm-twist war politics and agitate adverse alliances during such trying times when the currents amid our historical tribulation groups any suspiciously labelled country of probable confrontation. Still chasing tit for tat balance hardly conjures up esteem progressiveness.

Whilst equipped in basic ethics based civilization style negotiations leadership only full compliance can beat crises of sovereignty construction outliving unforetold political storms precipitated by negativist multinational regimes holding unstated agenda backkshishing terrorizing happenstances on ill informed communities loosely create more chasms for decay law-supporting mechanisms tailored conformity should be the going!

Furthermore isolationisms growth contracts 'paranoia-prone syndrome' against scientific analysis which conflicts with approaches posited above & renders poor balances between nations histories becoming wasteful trivia at best.

In European politics, perhaps acknowledging EU's slack-standing & unequal disposition or struggling past colonial oppression rejuvenates public trusts steering geopolitical policy rather than faulty turncoats erected deadwood allegiance zones putting urgency agendas without inclusive premises taking into deliberateness our societal frontiers elevating animosity instead representing integration

Preferably a moral palimpsest educative environments outlined in line with binding philosophy through flexible digital architectures social transport encourages republications promulgation crossing bounds open standards enough more just equity breaches weaning towards true formations!

I'm a little surprised to see this. Do you want Russia to lose so badly that you're willing to support the US military industrial complex?

The debt used to fund the war machine will only speed up the collapse of the US, even if they manage to successfully invade Russia.

Historically invading Russia doesn't end well for the invaders (Hitler, Napoleon) 😂

So you support the US agression & regime change that started all of this? The US is trying to cut Russia off from their only warm water port by installing a hostile regime in a country that is more economically important to them than Mexico is to the US. And in the process our politicians are funneling billions to themselves & crony corps while risking nuclear war to do so. Putin made it very clear that Ukraine was a red line & that he didn't want war. He tried to make an agreement that would have prevented conflict, & the US stopped it. Internal officials in the US & even Henry Kissinger (who is generally a total psychopath) have said that US regime change in Ukraine is a horrible idea & a needless form of aggression toward Russia. There is a clear desire to overthrow Putin, & if I was in his postion I'd probably nuke the shit out of the US. As an American sick of all the pedos in power I'd almost support it. If DC turned into a lake with all of our "politcal leaders" at the bottom, the world would probably be a better place.