Node policies work.

This is the one miner who is actively trying to undermine the p2p relay network with Slipstream, and even they had to stop accepting subsat transactions out of risk of losing blocks because the nodes' relay policy doesn't accept them.

**CORE 29.1 IS CHANGING THAT THIS MONTH**

https://x.com/PortlandHODL/status/1958520763083825640

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Do you believe forcing spam into public keys is better than making prunable spam via op_return easier?

Who is forcing you to spam?

Well, I can take a guess

Seriously, I would not be surprised.

Zionists hate Bitcoin, they hate anything they can't control

Great minds this alike my friend haha ๐Ÿคฃ Nothing would surprise me with these people!

Just how they subverted our culture/society and spammed it with porn, feminism, and all sorts of anti Christian values.

Gain power โ€”> disrupt from within โ€”> extract โ€”> gaslight and play victim

Every single time

Are you saying the masters of deception are behind the subversion of the chain?? They would never

I totally agree with the desire to censor all forms of spam. But the main question is why?

The answer has something to do with resource utilization and not all spam is created equal in this regard.

While Iโ€™d like a method of transaction censorship that precludes spam and yet still permits valid use of block space, I havenโ€™t seen a proposal that can do that.

Spam today is simply tomorrowโ€™s fully utilized bitcoin blocksโ€ฆif spam matters that much now, perhaps the real answer is to force smaller blocks?

Don't worry, once knots hit 70%, we will slam shut the fake pub keys door as well.

How can any relay block fake pubkeys?

They canโ€™t.

Donโ€™t get me wrong, I love Lukeโ€ฆbut I donโ€™t understand why he thinks this is an important issue. His reasoning isnโ€™t clear to me. Spam merely brings the future forward. If thatโ€™s a problem we need a better solution than policy.

Ideology and pragmatic programming are two different things.

Ur retarded

Why can't I accept sub 1 sat transactions using knots?

You can, that's not the point.

I tried adjusting the settings, it won't accept

"won't accept" how?

No way Adam Back didnโ€™t realize this.

Is there a a piece of writing somewhere that sets out the technical argument why should run Knots? I want to read the arguments but have not seen a clear explanation. nostr:npub1lh273a4wpkup00stw8dzqjvvrqrfdrv2v3v4t8pynuezlfe5vjnsnaa9nk