I mostly agree with this, the only counter that comes to mind: those who maybe can’t afford to express their support for a piece of content.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Repost. Even 1 sat works tho.

That’s a great point: amplifying the content is definitely a value add! Thanks for repositioning that thought. 🧚🏼‍♀️

Perhaps the most frugal way is to get free sats from Lolli or Fold etc and when there’s enough move them and use them here. Just a thought. 🙂

so i’m not the only one who sees it kinda aporophobic 💀

That was my initial line of thinking, but he’s right in saying that amplifying the content is a value add allowing someone to participate in support without even having to spend a sat. I prefer sharing over a like. Did you still feel this way after hearing this point?

not quite. i still think people should be allowed to make decisions (to support or not to support) on their own – or maybe i still childishly believe in things like radiohead’s “in rainbows” experiment.

at least i can tell for myself, i’m fine with some likes/reposts/replies to my posts and zero sats coming from it

They still can

… by not interacting – even they want to – because they have no sats?

Interact with repost or comment/reply

👍 is fiat

⚡️ is POW

Reply is POW

#repost are desperately under utilized at present.

I’m doing my best Jack. Did a quick repost too!!

🫂⚡️

Comments are equivalent to sending lightning satoshis to the poster, the respondent, as well as the client and repeater.

I’m fine with it also, but did feel satisfied with the counter of amplifying if one can’t afford. They giving the content more visibility you’re increasing the impact of the content you appreciate while opening it up to compensation from others in your network. That’s a money-free value add IMO

so, we both agreed that having a free alternative for those who would like to but can’t afford to support is a good thing – that’s nice 💞

Yes! 🫶

🤔

Extreme poverty is defined by the UN, as living on 9,500 sats / day

A zap can be 1 sat

1 sat = $0.00024

Zaps are themselves not exclusionary to any human, they are exclusionary to machine automation on an industrial scale.

i totally paid to get the cd. :)

They can repost or comment for free

I 🤙🏻 this note

🤣

🤷🏻‍♂️

🤣

The point is, if that wasn't there you would have reposted or zapped. Pure signal.

Or you would have done nothing.

Much better engagement this way and I’m loving the add free environment

Yes! I’m good with this. I’d rather them share or engage than like if they can’t financially participate

Your pfp isn’t showing btw

It is for me, maybe a relay lag?

Must be, I like your robot though

⚡️

But sometimes I liked a content, but I don't want to comment or share. in this case, removing the 'like' button would be detrimental to the creator of the content. Right?

I think existing social media structures have taught us that a passive nod is support, however, in real terms, it is not. Especially when we are increasingly living in a society that empowers people who output content to earn money for their effort. If you enjoyed it but don’t want to share it or affirm it with words OR shoot them a sat, you probably didn’t really enjoy it that much.

It makes sense. I liked it, but not a lot. So would you just view the post? I believe it is important to encourage the production of content. At least if we want this network to have a large scale.

That makes sense.

How about when I already agree with what the person writes, and wish to repost it, It turns into a race of typing ideas before anyone. It might cost me physical energy to walk to the mailbox, but I don't need to exchange it for bitcoin first.