The "feathered serpent" deity of the Aztecs called Quetzalcoatl was an enlightened person.

"Quetza" means "to raise".

"Coatl" means "serpent".

Coatzin is a reference to "the venerable serpent".

This is talking about raising the kundalini serpent.

This is what Christ was talking about in Matthew 10:16.

This is why the serpent was present in Genesis 3.

The raising of the serpent is the same thing as being moved by the Holy Spirit. It's the same thing as climbing the Tree of Life, balancing Yin with Yang, etc. Fully raising the serpent is enlightenment.

If this doesn't make sense to you, but you want to understand it better, pay attention to my work. Links in my bio.

🪶

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

shut up Satan.

I’m sorry that the people that you trusted lied to you.

I hope one day you’ll realize how to love your neighbors as yourself.

Wow,..😍😍.... really fascinating hw Quetzalcoatl as the feathered serpent connects to raising the Kundalini nd spiritual enlightenment. The way it ties into so mny ancient symbols nd even biblical references is mind opening.

This really reminds me of the Kundalini serpent in Indian tradition.... also a vital energy rising through the chakras fr spiritual awakening. Like Quetzalcoatl’s feathered serpent, its abt enlightenment nd balance, mch like the cosmic dance of Shiva or the Tree of Life concept. Ancient wisdom truly speaks across cultures!... 🧡...

Thankx for sharing..🧠

Yes :)

The coiled serpent is a part of the spirit body's anatomy.

Humans have a rich history with psychedelics.

At least one family of psychedelics, ergot/LSD, gives us the ability to see magnetic fields including the spirit body and its anatomical components.

Greece and India both have a history with this and both traditions offer depictions of coiled serpents i.e. Kundalini Shakti and the Orphic Egg.

Beer making is a very old practice and where there is barley there is ergot so psychedelic trips explain why knowledge of chakras, nadis, Ida, Pingala, Sushumna, and Kundalini Shakti is distributed around the world but using different words.

If you're unfamiliar with my work, there is several hours worth of podcast content in the links in my profile. Wait until you find out what my theory is on how the ancient Egyptians were using the sarcophagus in the Queen's Chamber in the Great Pyramid at Giza. ;)

As for ancient wisdom floating through cultures, you'll probably love the explanation I give for the Cinderella story.

Namaste, fren.

Namaste brother,

Loved reading u here .. alittle for nw.. 😉😉... Keep spreading the awakening and enlightenment.. 🧡🧡

The Aztecs were bloodthirsty savages who had more in common with Sodom and Gomorrah than Jesus.

Oh, like the Crusaders and Spanish Inquisition?

Blood is on everyone’s hands.

You’re cherry picking.

Be better.

The Crusades were justified defensive wars waged to defend christians and christian lands from barbaric muslim invaders.

The Spanish inquisition was created to deal with the consequences of taqiya. I actually don't care to go too much into detail here, but a lot of the criticisms against the inquisition is both legitimate and a product of protestant propaganda.

None of these have anything to do with the Aztecs, who were bloodthirsty savages that would rip out the still beating hearts from the chest of their children as part of their barbaric religious rituals. Good riddance.

Justified? Defensive? These words wreak of cognitive dissonance. Jesus wouldn’t have condoned that and you know it.

I know what Taqiya is. I know a lot more about every religion than you including your own.

There is no cognitive dissonance with defending the innocent. I don't think Jesus would disprove of protecting His flock. Historically, it was a desparate situation - the islamic horde was threatening to engulf the Eastern Roman Empire. If it weren't for the crusades, Constantinople would have fallen earlier and Europe might have fallen to the barbarians much earlier than the 21st century.

If you understand Taqiya and the Reconquista, then you understand why the Spanish came up with the Inquisition.

Both of these topics are moving the goalpost and are complex topics. Neither the Crusades nor the Inquisition were fundamental parts of the christian religion, unlike human sacrifice which was a core component of aztec religious rituals.

The inquisition and the crusades are complex and nuanced topics. What isn't complex is the immorality and savagery of the Aztec religion and the brutality with which the Aztecs treated their enemies. Good riddance, like I said. I don't think there is any value at all in examining their religious practices, aside for satisfying scientific curiosity perhaps.

That's the thing though...you don't understand any religious tradition well enough to be teaching religion to anyone so remarking upon the Aztec tradition as though you're well informed is disingenuous and is a literal instance of you bearing false witness to knowledge you do not have.

You're way out of your depth. I promise you I can interpret the Bible better than not only you, but better than anyone you've ever met and I can back up my "interpretation" with scientific evidence and ideas that are possessed of scientific plausibility...things that explain Noah's flood...things that explain the Genesis "creation" story (it's not a creation story but you dogmatists will never figure that out).

You probably can't even explain why there is a discrepancy and qualifier associated with Matthew and Mark's differing accounts of Jesus' dying words. You probably think you know what Jesus said but you don't and the fact that you don't means you falsely believe that God can abandon anyone. That's absurd and would have been absurd to Jesus. Jesus was speaking a language that nobody in the Levant would have known because nobody else traveled like Christ did and the few who did were merchants, not geniuses.

Your own tradition is a Frankenstein. Baptism is Egyptian. The Eucharist is Greek. Christ derives from Chi and Rho which is both Egyptian (Cairo, Hieroglyphics, etc.) and Greek (Chiron, hierophant, hero, Hera, Heracles, chariot, etc.) Santa Clause is the Siberian reindeer shaman. Christ learned from the Druids, Egyptians, and the Nagas during the missing years of the New Testament. The early gatherings of followers of Christ didn't call it "church". They called it "the way" which is a direct homage to "the Tao" which is something Christ likely picked up travelling and learning in the far east.

Dogmatists who claim to love their neighbor as themself are hypocrites.

You can't be a dogmatist and love your neighbor. Dogmatists are heresy hunters, not common ground hunters.

I'm sorry that the people you trusted lied to you. I'm sorry that you are gripped by some sort of Stockholm syndrome variant. I'm sorry that you choose to be afraid of ideas in an age where everyone's ideas are very easy to explore online.

The only holy war is internal and it is between love and fear. Your own book echoes the sentiment of "be not afraid" well over 100 times, so you really need to get over your fear control mechanism that was installed into you by those upon whom you were dependent for your survival growing up.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzq92fa497w8g6wr4zmjj9jmxsc4xxrt4yshrwfedgefrrwkxf3h22qqsg6v620hdwt4mhfuapdd8xfky8lau6lrn7qvck720n2eqv69pk83q27dk7c

Cool, not gonna read that. You're a religious expert, I believe you.

I think it is a good thing that a religion and culture that venerates child sacrifice is gone and largely forgotten.

Invincible ignorance. Classic dogmatist move. Stick your head in the sand. That'll make the predator just magically disappear.

Strawman. Your logic consists of dogshit wrapped in catshit.

That serpent from Genesis 3 led to sin and death. The Holy Spirit does not lead to sin it is the Set Apart Spirit.

The serpent in Genesis 3 was in the story to represent the fact that Adam and Eve had just achieved the spiritual accomplishment of self-awareness.

Matthew 10:16 is about achieving another spiritual accomplishment…multiple really: unconditional love, clear communication, and “giving it to God” if you will.

2 Corinthians 11:3