This would seem to rule out Catholicism and Eastern Orthodox as valid Christian denominations
Again Jesus:
βBut you are not to be called rabbi, for you have one teacher, and you are all brothers. And call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven. Neither be called instructors, for you have one instructor, the Christ. The greatest among you shall be your servant. Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.β
https://ref.ly/Mt23.8-12 via the Logos Bible Android app.
Discussion
I have never understood where the Catholics and even the Orthodox get off on calling people "Father so and so" when this to me seems to be a clear violation of what Jesus said.
I really hate how the Catholics call the Pope "Holy Father" when that is what Jesus called His Father, God! (See John 17)
In light of this commandment, I've even stopped using titles like "Pastor so and so," or "Elder so and so," because I think Jesus was telling His followers not to use such honorifics. And if you encounter someone who gets offended when you don't use such a title for them I think you have identified someone with a problem!
From that point of view, what do you make of Paul calling himself a father to the Corinthians in 1 Corinthians 4:15?
"For though you might have ten thousand guardians in Christ, you do not have many fathers. Indeed, in Christ Jesus I became your father through the gospel." (RSVCE)
I personally have not regarded Paul as a Christian for a long time (and don't regard his letters as being comparable to scripture)
I also don't believe in ghosts or spirits in general, though, so probably my opinion is of little interest
Throwing out the majority of the New Testament that the entirety of Christianity has held as canon is a bold move, brother.
The Catholics like to talk about being guided by tradition and the magisterium rather than scripture alone, but ultimately how do you decide which tradition to follow? How do you decide what is legitimate magisterium and what is not?
For that matter, how do you decide what is legitimate scripture and what is not?
If it comes down to reason, then there is nothing bold about my move.
One tradition is founded by Christ, and all others are made up.
Does yours have an unbroken lineage of succession tracing itself back to Peter, on whom Christ said he would build his church?
How do you know that Christ said that?
How do you know that Christ had the capacity to truthfully make such a claim (ie by virtue of divinity) ?
Presumably scripture, but then how do you know what is and is not scripture?
What is at the bottom of it, if not reason?
Talk to Descartes and tell me how far you get with pure reason.
I have indoor plumbing, so apparently pretty far
βYou can only find truth with logic if you have already found truth without it.β
βG.K. Chesterton
*sighs*
I don't think that you really want to go there, considering how awful many of the popes have been and how very far from the path the catholic church has strayed, starting even before it became the Roman Catholic church.
The moral quality of the popes does not change my view about whether they are of the line that Christ established.
It sure the heck does for me since I don't recognize the church as needing any other centralized leadership aside from Jesus, since the church is the bride of Christ. The church should recognize only Jesus as the head of the family.
Appeal to tradition is a fallacy
So is appeal to Wikipedia π€£
That's why the site has notes to external links
I don't think it's inappropriate to acknowledge a position that someone holds. For example, someone might be a teacher, but Jesus said don't call them "Teacher so and so." I think it would have been fine for Timothy to acknowledge Paul as his father in the Gospel, but wrong for him to refer to Paul as "Father Paul." Thus, it may not be a problem to refer to the church fathers as a class of writers and leaders in the early church, but saying Father Ignatius or Father Augustine would probably be wrong.
By that standard, then, should we not call our own parents Father and Mother?
Jesus said you have to hate them, right?
That's a good question, and I don't have all the answers. What is your understanding of how to interpret what Jesus is saying as far as calling no man father, or rabbi or teacher?
It would seem that Jesus is speaking somewhat hyperbolically in his denunciation of the hypocrisy of the Pharisees, who take on such titles in order to exalt themselves. This is clear because he concludes by saying "whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted" (Matthew 23:12).
Likewise, it would seem that we are not to take it completely literally when Jesus says that we must hate our father and mother, for he also says that those who voice literal hatred in terms such as "raca" or "you fool" are liable to judgement and hell. Thus it cannot be that Jesus is prescribing hatred.
Rather, our love for God should be such that, relative to it, our affection for parents is as hatred. Likewise we should not seek or insist upon honorifics for ourselves, but it is not wrong for someone to use a title of respect when addressing another.
I agree with everything you said except for that last bit "...but it is not wrong for someone to use a title of respect when addressing another." Jesus did say don't be called
That seems to me to be a somewhat incoherent position. If someone holds a legitimate position, it is natural in our use of language to use the term of address that goes with that position. It is clear that Jesus is saying that we should not pridefully seek station for ourselves, nor should we be sycophants and give others accolades they do not deserve. However, I fail to see the substantial distinction between acknowledging a spiritual station and according an honorific proper to that station.
If Paul is a spiritual father to the church in Corinth, it would be strange to say that he ought never address the Corinthians as "my children in Christ," or some such title accordant to their relative stations. Likewise, if the Corinthians can call Paul a spiritual father, it would be counterintuitive to say that they can never address him directly as such. The honorific in such a case is given out of love and respect rooted in Christ; it is not insisted upon out of pride, nor is it bestowed out of a fawning servility.
Out of an attempt to be faithful to Jesus' words as I currently understand them I will avoid using such titles, and it is my hope that people are not offended because I don't.
Then why does he, from the cross, entrust Mary to John's care saying to him "behold your mother," and to her "behold your son?" Was he telling John he ought to hate Mary?
No, I don't believe he's actually telling us to hate anyone, because that contradicts his commands that we love everyone. I think it was a hebraism meaning that our love for God should exceed our love for our parents or anyone else, to the point that it almost looks like we hate our parents in comparison to our love and loyalty to God. God comes first. I was being a little cheeky in my response because I don't have a good answer to your question. π
I think Jesus committed his mother into John's care because his other brothers like James probably weren't there at the cross. But he doesn't tell John to call her "Mother Mary."
Perhaps Jesus was not actually concerned about his followers being so impenetrably thick that they couldnβt tell the difference between a weak human being born to die, and the βimmortal invisible God only wiseββ¦ I would suggest that using words like βholy fatherβ in analogous senses about two such radically different orders of being is so commonplace as to not require comment or defense, and certainly creates no confusion on the part of anyone older than the age of three.
I get called Jesus and God all the time β¦ by three year olds. Everyone else just chuckles.
I also work regularly with evangelical, Bible-only Christians who want nothing to do with calling me Father. I explain to them that itβs more a reminder to me that I am called to lay down my life, as fathers must, rather than to demand blind obedience from Godβs flock. My parishioners certainly donβt obey me blindly. I invite the Sola Scriptura Christians to use the title, in that sense, as an act of charity. They always decline, so there are a few terms I suggest as alternatives. In the end, if they call me Nick, Iβm not worried about it, but I pray for an increase in brotherly love on the part of my fellow believers. π
I suppose this is similar to what Paul said about some Christians observing certain days to the Lord, and others not, also to the Lord. I would hope each side is trying to be faithful to what we believe Christ is saying. The Lord knows the heart.